Skip to main content
Help Join 2M+ Members

King George III's 1776 Speech That Doomed the British Empire

On October 31, 1776, George III chose insults over peace, calling the Founders "daring and desperate," a speech that pushed fence-sitters toward revolution.

Fallen Royalty

Photo: Hulton Archive/Getty Images

Two hundred and fifty years ago, King George III of England made – on October 31, 1776 – a fundamental mistake. On that day, almost four months after the Declaration of Independence, he threw away the last chance for peace and began calling Americans names. It served him poorly.

On the last day of October 1776, King George gave his first speech to Parliament on the American uprising, soon the American Revolution – which would change the history of all Mankind, reducing the United Kingdom, over time, to a buffeted former empire, and elevating America to superpower.

On that day, he threw down. He did not have to; he could have sought reconciliation, and while that approach might have taken time and money, it would have required far less time and money than the war that would soon consume him, become unstoppable, and lead to defeat for the British military.

In the speech, the King called our Declaration of Independence, courage in the face of oppression – or “Rebellion to Tyranny is Obedience to God,” as patriots said at the time – a foolish outrage. He despised our forefathers… “for daring and desperate is the spirit of those leaders, whose object has always been dominion and power, that they have now openly renounced all allegiance to the crown, and all political connection with this country.”

Rather than rethink the endgame, imagine a different way of resolving the conflict, which for us ended more than favorably; he was consumed by pride and, as pride often does, it blinded him. He disparaged George Washington, saying, “it was necessary to prepare for another campaign.”

Ironically, the Howe brothers – General William and Admiral Richard – were the King’s military leaders in America; they could not or did not contain Washington in New York. When word of the King’s speech reached the colonies, it enraged those on the fence.

Perhaps the historical lesson is that, at any given time in history, we are both a product of the past and often unaware of how an alternate set of options, a different path, might decisively affect the future.

Would Great Britain have been able to continue dominating indefinitely? Not likely. Would the Revolution have been stoppable? Maybe for a time. Would we have ended up free and prosperous, built out – over time – on the same principles we call constitutional now?

No one knows. What we do know is that America was forged in the crucible of necessity, that oppression is ultimately unsustainable. Oppression is clear when it happens, at any level, in any nation, for any period. It is at odds with God-given rights in our Bill of Rights.

So, what is interesting – this, 250 years after a Kingly fit of pride – is that history was about to sweep him aside, and that the power of freedom, the engine that made us America, roared to life after that speech, changing history … And that engine is still changing history.

Topics PoliticsU.S. foreign policy and national securityCounter-narcotics and international law enforcementAmerican politics and governmentLeadership, character, and American history
Share this article:
Robert B. Charles

About the author

National Spokesman, AMAC

@Bobby4Maine

Robert Charles is a former Assistant Secretary of State under Colin Powell, former Reagan and Bush 41 White House staffer, Maine attorney, ten-year naval intelligence officer (USNR), and 25-year businessman. He wrote “Narcotics and Terrorism” (2003), “Eagles and Evergreens” (North Country Press, 2018), and “Cherish America: Stories of Courage, Character, and Kindness” (Tower Publishing, 2024). He is the National Spokesman for AMAC. Today, he is running to be Maine’s next Governor (please visit BobbyforMaine.com to learn more)!

Expertise

  • • U.S. foreign policy and national security
  • • Counter-narcotics and international law enforcement
  • • American politics and government
  • • Leadership, character, and American history

Credentials

  • • Former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State, Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (October 2003 - March 2005)
  • • Reagan White House staffer (1981-1983)
  • • Deputy Associate Director, Office of Domestic Policy, George H.W. Bush White House (1992-1993)
  • • Staff Director and Chief Counsel, U.S. House Subcommittee on National Security, International Affairs, and Criminal Justice (1995-1999)

Comments

Start writing — we'll just need a name to post. Comments are reviewed before promotion.

You’ll get an email when someone replies — unless you’ve unsubscribed. Every email has the link.