The Democratic Party Turns to Joy Reid for ‘Sober, Centrist’ Politics

According to New York Times journalist Annie Karni, “Democrats knew in real time last year that they had bungled their response” to Donald Trump’s address before a joint session of Congress.

There, the party’s more excitable members put on a “hokey and incoherent” spectacle in which they heckled the president and responded silently to his remarks with paddles adorned with messages — “Save Medicaid,” “Musk Steals,” and simply “False” among them.

Indeed, Democratic establishmentarians were visibly embarrassed by their colleagues’ cringe-inducing display. The mere act of criticizing their overzealous fellow Democrats resulted in a deluge of vitriolic attacks on the party’s leadership class from its base voters.

“The senior House Democrat told Axios that a colleague called them after a town hall crying and said: ‘They hate us. They hate us,’” read one report summarizing the Democratic primary electorate’s reaction to the establishmentarians’ gentle rebuke of their colleagues. “Another thing I got was: ‘Democrats are too nice,’” one Democratic lawmaker confessed. “‘Nice and civility doesn’t work. Are you prepared for violence?’”

That psychotic response to what was, in essence, a minor internal disagreement over tactics seems to have properly spooked the Democratic Party’s cooler heads. They’re determined not to repeat the mistakes of 2025. So, in the effort to project what Karni describes as “the sober, centrist counter to Mr. Trump that party leaders had wanted to project that night,” Democrats plan to boycott Trump’s State of the Union address this year. Instead, they will counterprogram Trump’s speech with a rally — the “People’s State of the Union.” There, Democrats will promote their own temperate prudence and authoritative solemnity, and they will do so with the help of the night’s host . . . former MSNBC host Joy Reid.

It would be hard to envision a more comprehensive surrender to the ranks of the psychologically distressed within the Democratic firmament than handing this platform over to Reid. Her ignorance — not a passionate fervor that temporarily clouds her judgment, but sheer ignorance — is well documented. Our own Becket Adams has made the case:

Reid’s 2024 postmortem is but one example of her overwhelming ignorance. Other examples include her alleging incorrectly that Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch holds a seat “stolen” by Republicans following the death of the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Gorsuch was confirmed in 2017 and served with Ginsburg, who did not die until 2020. Reid also once claimed that the polling website 538 was named for the margin in Florida “when the Republican SCOTUS reversed the 2000 election during a recount, making Dubya the president.” None of that’s true. First, the margin in Florida was 537 votes. Second, the Supreme Court didn’t reverse the 2000 election (Bush always led in every count). Finally, “538” refers to the number of electors in the Electoral College. But other than that, that’s some solid work.

She is also an unreliable narrator, as her literally unbelievable contention that some ne’er-do-well retroactively hacked her blog and surreptitiously populated it with homophobic, anti-Islamic, and conspiratorial remarks suggests. But conspiracism is Reid’s stock-in-trade.

She attributed California’s economically moribund condition not to the maladministration of the Democrats who have controlled the state for decades but a wicked cabal of “the billionaire right” that exsanguinated the Gold State through drilling and fracking — a campaign to “drive out the brown people and the black and Asian people, or just sink them into the same apartheid they’ve created in Texas.” She’s flirted with election denialism, contending in the absence of anything resembling evidence that the 2024 election was rigged in Donald Trump’s favor. She seemed genuinely convinced that a shadowy but influential network had popularized the word “inflation” for the first time during Joe Biden’s term in office and only to undermine his standing with the public.

And, of course, there seems to be no social phenomenon that Reid cannot blame on America’s commitment to institutional and structural racism. Nor is she capable of analyzing political events in the Trump era without likening them to the events that culminated in the rise of the Third Reich.

But that is what the Democratic base wants to hear. Indeed, Reid’s flavor of politics is triumphant on the left. Just as Democrats knew the paddleboard stunt was a disaster, Democrats knew that Kamala Harris’s effort to brand Trump a “fascist” was a flop. But even in Karni’s piece, establishmentarian Democrats are quoted casually accusing Trump of “marching our country toward fascism.”

Joy Reid has her finger on the pulse of the party, whether Democrats like it or not. Her hyperbolic style is what Democrats demand. So, the party will walk out of Trump’s speech, despite the breach of tradition and decorum, and they will hand the keys over to exiles from the late MSNBC.

The Democrats are giving Reid, a former television host who was fired for consistently poor ratings, this platform because they know she’s a bona fide headliner. This is a sop to the ascendant radicals in their midst. Democrats know that “sober, centrist” leadership is not what their voters want, even if the American majority does.

Reprinted with permission from National Review by Noah Rothman.

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of AMAC or AMAC Action.