When Donald Trump returned to the Oval Office, he pledged — on Day One — to address the nation’s housing affordability crisis by lowering costs and increasing the supply of housing to put the American Dream of homeownership back within reach. Early signs suggest he’s making good on that promise.
A year ago, the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage was hovering above 7 percent, and purchase applications were declining. On May 22, Freddie Mac reported that 30-year mortgage rates are already 2.5 percent lower than they were right before Trump took office. Earlier in the month, Freddie Mac stated, “Rates are lower and have remained stable for weeks, sparking continued increases in purchase applications.”
The latest S&P Core Logic data, released May 27, found that home prices in the 20 largest metropolitan areas dropped for the first time in two years and that prices could fall further.
As a former Federal Housing Commissioner during the first Trump administration, I’m not surprised the housing market is improving. The administration has aggressively promoted pro-growth housing policies, and, slowly but surely, they are proving effective.
Among the innovative approaches to boost housing supply is a joint task force — led by Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner and Department of Interior Secretary Doug Burgum — to identify underused federal land for residential developments. Because the federal government manages nearly 30 percent of all land in the United States, there’s ample opportunity to create a housing supply without adding more bureaucracy.
HUD’s housing policy expertise will be combined with DOI’s stewardship of more than 500 million acres to identify buildable sites — including vacant lots, former military bases, or parcels near cities with existing infrastructure — while steering clear of national parks and sensitive ecological areas. HUD will identify high-demand regions in coordination with local and state officials, and DOI will facilitate the transfer or lease of land to localities to address housing needs, ensuring affordability remains central in the process.
Building on federal land offers a practical solution — no costly land grabs, no endless red tape — and creates a collaborative process between the public and private sectors. It’s such a compelling idea that it has garnered bipartisan support. Sen. Ruben Gallego, a Democrat from Arizona, applauded the initiative, calling it a “creative solution to housing shortages” in western states.
Solutions to increase housing affordability continue to unite Republicans and Democrats. Senators Todd Young, R-Ind. and Maria Cantwell, D-Wash. and Representatives Darin LaHood, R-Ill. and Suzan DelBene, D-Ala. have introduced the American Housing Credit Improvement Act. It would expand and strengthen the popular Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, the nation’s primary tool for financing affordable rental housing. The tax credit embodies a successful public-private partnership. Since its creation in 1986, it has financed 4 million affordable homes.
These efforts are evidence that Republicans and Democrats understand the only way to address our housing shortfall is to build our way out of it. It’s a refreshing change from the prior administration, which too often sought to vilify private sector solutions while vastly expanding government intervention at the federal level.
From misguided rent control measures to costly energy efficiency standards, the Biden administration’s blunders resulted in less building and more bureaucracy. At one point, the former president and his Department of Justice even blamed AI rent-pricing software as though an algorithm was the cause of inflation. Blaming pricing software for inflation is like blaming your thermometer for a heat wave. The software merely reflects market conditions — it doesn’t create them!
Trump is targeting the real issue: the fact that America doesn’t have enough homes. His housing regulators are focused on solutions: embracing innovation, eliminating fraud, and trusting the free market.
By focusing on building, the administration is creating more affordable housing the old-fashioned way — by increasing supply — and the results are speaking for themselves.
Len Wolfson served as the assistant secretary for congressional and intergovernmental relations and acting Federal Housing Administration commissioner from 2017 to 2020. He wrote this for InsideSources.com.
Reprinted with permission from DC Journal by Len Wolfson.
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of AMAC or AMAC Action.

Trump is doing an AMAZING job of running our country. God Bless President Trump!!!
Housing shortage? Not really. If all the illegal aliens in our country are deported, we will have several million more homes available for Americans, which will go a long way toward solving the “housing shortage” without having to build anything.
CUT permits & housing zoning regs alone
Scrap Property Taxes
CUT lending rates
Then see the Boom begin
OK remodelling too
Another way to increase our housing supply is to encourage more manufactured housing. I’m not talking about mobile homes, rather traditional-looking homes built in a factory instead of stick-built on site. There’s a definite bias against manufactured housing by local zoning authorities, the insurance industry, banks, and the real estate industry itself. Many times realtors and appraisal companies won’t even deal with manufactured homes. If we’re serious about increasing the housing supply, add this to the toolkit. The article cherry-picks mortgage rates. Looking at the chart referenced, rates for a 30-year were 6.81% on June 18, 2025, but were 6.08% back in September 2024.
Blaming your thermometer for the heat wave I love it. That is pretty much democrat logic. Switch to all electric appliances and vehicles but have no place to load them nor power if there were loading stations. Or the one where Biden wanted to make all military vehicles electric. His argument, just before you enter the battlefield they could load up. Got an extension cord? Trump takes care of the simplest things. Federal govt has the land. Why not build affordable housing there. My granddaughter just purchased a house and was thrilled to find such low interest rate. All thanks to Trump and his economic policies. And he has been there not even 6 months. What did Biden do in 4 years. Oh yes he was taking a nap. Trump in a weekend destroyed nuclear bomb making facilities in Iran, got a cease fire, went to a fundraiser. Took care of the attack on the church in Syria and flew to Europe for a NATO summit. But ole sloppy Joe was as smart as a tack and as alert as a fire alarm. Can I interest anyone in this bridge I have for sale? Cheap.
I just read today on realtor.com that there is a bill called More Homes on the Market Act.
“Why the home equity tax existsThe roots of this growing problem stretch to 1997, when Congress rewrote the rules for taxing homeowners’ profits from selling a primary residence. Before then, the process was complicated and frustrating: Sellers could defer paying capital gains taxes if they bought a more expensive home, but they had to keep decades of receipts and faced a tax hit if they ever wanted to downsize.
“It was a compliance mess,” says Evan Liddiard, the NAR’s director of tax policy. “You had to keep track of the first home that you bought and every improvement in every home over the course of a lifetime to show how much gain you ultimately had.”
The 1997 change fixed that headache. It gave homeowners the freedom to exclude up to $250,000 in profit if single, or $500,000 if married and filing jointly, every time they sold a primary home with few strings attached.
The simplicity was key: For most people, the exclusion was so generous that meticulous record-keeping was no longer necessary—and it opened the door to using their home equity to help fund retirement, pay for medical care, or support their kids’ education.
But there was one major oversight: Congress never linked those exclusions to inflation, and now, homeowners are paying the price.
In the decades since, home prices have climbed more than 260%, while the tax exemption has stayed exactly the same. If it had kept pace, the cap would now be about $660,000 for individuals and $1.32 million for couples, according to research from the University of Illinois Chicago.”
There are plenty of homes but unfortunately people were given loans that couldn’t afford them; now they are all blighted properties.
I can’t believe the price of homes even in my area where for a 50+ year home use to go for $100k-$150k. Now they are about $200k and up. New are way over $300k!
Price of houses have gone up about 20% per year for many years now & that is the real problem & what caused this inflation boom? The lower interest rates might allow people to get in with lower monthly payments , but it helps fuel inflation. And when interest rate is too low, then Fed has to print more dollars & what do you think that does to value of dollar and inflation. Prices of houses have gone skyhigh and what is the real cause of that, so that we do not make the same mistake again.
There will never be any real home ownership as long as you have real estate taxes. Because, if you retire and don’t have the money to pay your property taxes they take your home. Either you end up working as a Walmart greeter to pay your property taxes or you have to move away to some little town far from civilization. Once you hit about 60, 65 in this environment, companies will not hire you.
I locked in on a low 3.25 in Dec. 2020. Closed on my home January 2021. Thanks to my President then and now. I would not be able to sell and buy anything equivlent to what I have now. Can interest rates drop that low again? I believe they will. Our President has been very busy cleaning up the s#@t that the D-emonic N-arcissistic C-riminals created and left. He is a savay business man and I trust in the plan.
That’s my Pres!!!
🙂
does anyone know what the guidelines are for low income housing? It seems like when they build low income housing that low income is never there for most of those that actually have low income. you almost have to make $3,000 or more a month to pay rent on a low income rental which rents for $1,400 plus a month, and you might be able to afford heating bill, and medicine, and medical supplies along with food, clothing and other items..
To maximize the use of the land, why not build condos, instead of single family homes (which becomes a sore eye later on). As they are not properly maintained by low income homeowners who has no pride in ownership as we have seen in the past, which then become havens of crime. Condos will have less grounds maintenance, improve community support, encourages pride in ownership with Condo association’s support, and less cost in construction & in home insurance. They appreciate in value, just as good as single family homes, because they are better maintained by the Condo Association’s governance.
Another name for public-private partnership is fascism.
Inventory of unsold homes is up. Only way to solve the affordability problem is to get rates below 5.5%.
In case the Trump cultists haven’t noticed, almost no one can currently purchase a house. If they can manage the outlay to purchase one the ultra high property taxes and insurance costs will drive them under.
Thanks indeed Herr Trump.