Finance / Social Security Planning

Social Security Affected by Persistent Unemployment Checks

Social Security

Many economists and Republican governors have been fuming for months now about the so-called “Biden bonus” of paying people an extra $300 per week not to work through early September. Opponents of this scheme, passed in the last stimulus bill of March 2021 with Democrat votes only, note the bonuses are holding down job gains and even causing shortages and inflation, as employers up the ante with higher wages and signing offers to lure folks off the couch. Twenty-five governors, all Republican, have already terminated or announced they are soon terminating the $300 bonuses.

But politics aside, what is the impact of all this on the Social Security program?

It turns out it’s significant.

Why? People who collect unemployment benefits, as opposed to wages or salaries, do not pay the FICA tax (6.2 % to Social Security and 1.45% to Medicare), and neither do their employers. The longer millions collect unemployment rather than work, the more the Social Security Trust Fund suffers. As it now stands, the Fund is due to run dry after all surpluses currently being used to keep benefits whole are exhausted in about 2034. Benefits will then be cut for all by about 23% automatically. Experts think the reckoning date, though, may even be sooner due to the pandemic. We won’t know for sure until the 2021 report is released (any time now) by the Social Security Board of Trustees.

But it is worse still. People are actually doing damage to their futures, likely without realizing it, as time out of the workforce will affect their future monthly Social Security payments for the rest of their lives. That’s because Social Security uses one’s highest 35 years of earnings (adjusted for inflation) in calculating one’s monthly benefit. Throw a zero into that mix because one stayed out of the workforce collecting unemployment, and the benefit calculation will be significantly lower.

As stated, that kind of income is not credited.

Congress could rescind the bonus payments, but that appears off the table.

Congress will still have to fix the long-term issues by reforming the Social Security program, and the fixes become more difficult and painful the longer it waits. Essentially, to shore up its finances, there are three options—cut benefits, raise taxes, or increase the retirement age. That’s about it. Of course, a mix of any of those three can be applied as well, as in perhaps trimming benefits for the highest income earners.

But reform can never happen in the current toxic environment where any candidate or elected official who speaks the truth is hit with or accused of “cutting Social Security” or “throwing Granny off the cliff.” For years we’ve heard these ludicrous lines in commercials and campaign literature.

The public needs to understand Social Security’s financial problems in order not to fall victim to members of Congress looking only to their next election with lines like, “I pledge to increase everyone’s Social Security benefits.”

It’s a popular thing to say, and that is why so many members propose benefit hike bills. But it’s incredibly disingenuous. The tough, courageous, and righteous stance is to advocate for reforming the program to remain sound and stable and continue to exist as we know it for future generations.

AMAC’s Social Security Guarantee is designed to preserve and modernize the program without raising taxes on workers. One component is Social Security PLUS, a voluntary companion benefit (not privatization of the main program) that would allow all workers to have more money in retirement. See the full plan here.

Jeff Szymanski works in political communications at AMAC, a senior benefits organization with 2.4 million members. This piece is part of an ongoing attempt to inform Americans of the reality of Social Security’s precarious financial situation and to promote AMAC’s plan to preserve and modernize the program for successive generations.

We hope you've enjoyed this article. While you're here, we have a small favor to ask...

As we look forward to expanding our work in support of America’s Seniors, we're asking you to consider a gift to help the AMAC Foundation continue to grow.

The AMAC Foundation, a 501(c)(3), plays a vital role in developing resources that enrich America's Seniors' lives. From Social Security to Medicare—with a lot in between—our services have helped thousands of Seniors by providing guidance at a time when they need it most.

Your support of our tax-exempt Foundation will enable us to continue delivering programs that meet a growing community's needs and that are vital to their well-being.

Thank you for putting your faith in AMAC!

Donate Now

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Sign Up Today
Read more articles by AMAC, Jeff Szymanski
Subscribe
Notify of
18 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Theresa Rodriguez
1 month ago

Absolute #1 move should be to remove the law that says Social Security must buy US Treasury bonds with any “surplus”.

#2 move should be law forcing Congress to “repay” ALL funds removed from Social Security for their pet projects.

#3 move should be to privatize Social Security so that the workers and/or their heirs and/or their designated agents (like a bank) are the ONLY ones with access to that workers account. PERIOD.

Marilyn
3 months ago

Why isn’t the welfare system in danger? Why are the hardworking Americans, who worked all their lives up to over 70 yrs., need to worry. Their money should be there for them. Well, because of the Democrats, our monies were used for other government policies instead of remaining untouched as promised when it was voted for. Now, we find it threatened because the policies of the Democrats use our dollars for more important things, like paying for abortions overseas and doing transgender studies overseas, and just ridiculous science projects. We just sent almost a billion dollars to South America for what? It won’t help the people there and the government officials will keep the money and enrich themselves. Why can they take our money and then spend it and cut us off? Why not stop giving money away to people that are here illegally?

Felix
3 months ago

What’s the problem? I’m sure the federal government doesn’t worry about paying social security benefits, they will just keep printing dollars like they are doing to support illegal immigrants, global warming, Iran, Obama care, and all the other items in Biden’s 6 Trillion dollar budget. Just being factitious, the youth better wake up to what the democrats are doing to their future!

sharon
3 months ago

Congress …or whoever it was that ‘borrowed’ from social security…needs to pay it back and it won’t be in quite such a mess. When soc sec was formed it was not suppose to be touched by anyone except those that earned it…..but government thinks they have a right to do what they want.

Lee S McQuillen
3 months ago
Reply to  sharon

I thought it was the “Social Security Trust Fund” but must be wrong because it really was a trust fund, the money borrowed from it would actually still be there.

Mark Jebe
3 months ago
Reply to  sharon

Wrong. Social Security was an income tax scam from day one. All funds collected for Social Security were paid into the US Treasury’s General Fund, with no guarantee they’d ever be paid out, or to whom they’d be paid. Congress makes policy that instructs the Social Security Administrators on how much money to disburse and to whom it will be disbursed. Social Security payments aren’t guaranteed by anything. Congress could cut Social Security payments at any time.

In fact, Congress could discontinue Social Security payments altogether, so technically and legally your Social Security payments are, and always have been income taxes, some of which may be returned to you – or not – depending on annual decisions made by Congress.

Read the Social Security Act; there is no “Trust Fund”, and never was. FDR scammed the public.

Marilyn
3 months ago
Reply to  Mark Jebe

But it wasn’t taxed again until the Dem’s decided to tax it and then again. The democrats are all for taking what is ours and giving it away or using it for other means.

JohnH
3 months ago

Write your representatives & tell them your views on Social Security. Congress keeps kicking this down the road & leaving for the next group, and that is not prudent. Social Security checks are the main source of income to many of our retirees in United States.

Marilyn
3 months ago
Reply to  JohnH

Write your rep’s to secure social security and eliminate waste and welfare. Make the lazy get up off the couch.,

JohnH
3 months ago

The FICA/Medicare taxes are only on wages & therefore if person was unemployed then did not pay these taxes. There were millions of people unemployed & so what is estimate of dollars not paid in to Social Security starting with big job loss last year. This is a much bigger impact than the extra $399 unemployment bonus.

Kathleen Brown
3 months ago
Reply to  JohnH

$300 not $399

Ludmila
19 days ago
Reply to  Kathleen Brown

$300 per week – $1200 per month

JohnH
3 months ago

Trump offered deferral of payroll taxes in 2020. How many people took this & did they have to pay this money back when they did taxes this year?? Trump said if re-elected, he would forgive this deferral but he did not win.

Theresa Rodriguez
1 month ago
Reply to  JohnH

Don’t know about “forgiveness” but for my Husband, it wasn’t an option. DOD automatically deferred the Social Security and is now taking extra out of his paycheck to repay the deferment.

Dan W.
3 months ago

You forgot to mention the so-called “Trump bonus” of paying people an extra $600 per week not to work in 2020. How did that effect the Social Security Trust Fund in 2020 ?

Harold
3 months ago
Reply to  Dan W.

Dan you seem to forget the thousands of people who lost there jobs due to COVID 19. This was a way to help those affected by the pandemic. Now that jobs are once again available there are many who have not gone back to work because they make more on unemployment. It’s time for people to get back to work and not sit at home.

Dan W.
3 months ago
Reply to  Harold

Most red state governors didn’t buy in to the “shutdown” mentality and people in those states were not forced to quit their jobs. Of course, in the blue states………..

Ludmila
19 days ago
Reply to  Dan W.

That never happened- it was one time bonus not weekly

18
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x