Newsline

Education , Newsline

The War on Merit Continues with Ungrading

Posted on Thursday, February 8, 2024
|
by AMAC Newsline
|
42 Comments

AMAC Exclusive - By David Lewis Schaefer

college application; students of diversity

As competitive colleges and universities continue to admit underqualified applicants in order to adhere to their schools’ “equity” agenda, those students are predictably struggling and receiving poor grades. But now elite universities are offering a solution to that problem too: make course grading more subjective, or even eliminate objective grading completely. 

After the Supreme Court ruled in the 2023 Fair Admissions case that accepting students based on race was both illegal and unconstitutional, administrators at numerous competitive schools intimated that they would find ways to circumvent the decision. In the name of “diversity, equity, and inclusion,” their goal was still to favor members of selected “minorities” over better qualified white or Asian-American applicants.

One way to skirt the Court’s ruling was to eliminate the requirement that applicants submit scores on the SAT or ACT. This made it harder to compare the qualifications of different applicants, thus leaving more discretion in the hands of admissions officers.

But this strategy also exacerbated the “mismatch” problem, meaning that underqualified admittees to highly selective colleges would find it harder to compete once they matriculated, inducing them either to switch to less demanding majors (ethnic studies or sociology instead of pre-med) or drop out entirely – leaving them worse off than if they had attended a less selective but still meritorious college.

But there’s a new solution for the mismatch problem, or more generally for the problem of underprepared students finding it hard to succeed in college: eliminate or alter the mode of grading for college courses.

A champion of this approach is Peony Fhagen, Associate Vice President for Institutional Equity and Belonging at prestigious Colorado College. She is the director of that school’s Crown Center for Teaching and a leader in establishing the college’s new ADEI (Accessibility, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) plan.

Fhagen is a scholar of something called “Nigrescence theory” (more on this later) who reports having published “quantitative research on racial identity in the United States.” Besides working on a textbook on the psychology of “multicultural dynamics,” she has also begun a new project on “antiracist grading systems,” a theme on which she lectures at other campuses. 

According to the bio accompanying one of Fhagen’s most recent speaking events, although “antiracist pedagogy” is now “a major focus of teaching and learning centers” on American campuses, it fails to explain how to overcome the racist character of “traditional grading systems,” even though those systems originate “in white supremacy.”

“Letter grades and point systems associated with traditional grading in college-level courses that sort and rank students into hierarchies,” maintains Fhagen, “promote such problematic qualities as perfectionism, either/or thinking, and individualism.” By contrast, “the demand for more inclusive, equitable, and anti-oppressive educational experiences in higher education” has led to the invention of “three new grading systems: ungrading, contract grading, and specifications grading.” 

Fhagen, it should be noted, is not the only advocate of alternative methods of grading. In Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do Instead), Notre Dame anthropologist Susan D. Blum maintains that “many educators” now believe that that all grades should be abolished.

Short of that, both “contract grading” and “specifications grading” entail an advance agreement between a course instructor and his students on which assignments a student may choose to complete. Students receive comments on each written submission but without a grade, and course grades are subject to final negotiation between instructor and student.

Without entering into the merits of such systems (the present author remains highly dubious), what is distinctive about Fhagen’s take is her claim that adopting such alternative systems is necessary in order to banish “racism” from the classroom. 

In reality, not only are Fhagen’s accusations against “traditional” grading nonsensical, the abolition of grades may be particularly detrimental to less-prepared students, as Robert Talbert, a math professor at Grand Valley (Mich.) State University who attempted that system, has reported. 

“You’re always going to find variations in students’ preparation in college-level courses, but in ungrading, those variations seem to be amplified, because it’s all based on self-evaluation,” he writes. “Therefore, I’m not sure that ungrading is serving the students who work hard but don’t have the best grasp on the basic tools of the discipline as well as it does those whose grasp is stronger.” 

Moreover, he adds, “Ungrading might unwittingly contribute to equity gaps in higher education, particularly in the STEM subjects,” since “removing marks” from assignments “may take away the guideposts that learners from less privileged backgrounds might need as they navigate college courses. It’s as if someone took away all the signs in an airport in a foreign country and then dropped a nonnative-language speaker into it… those signs are helpful, and it’s hard to enjoy anything if you’re lost.”

Although Talbert’s overall estimation of ungrading is mixed, his point about how such a system particularly disadvantages less-prepared students – presumably including the core of the “minority” members whose interests Fhagen claims to represent – rings true.

More generally, however, the qualities of traditional grading that Fhagen identifies as racist – perfectionism (that is, striving to come as close as possible to perfection in one’s work, in and out of school), “either/or thinking” (i.e., a thing cannot “be” and “not be” at the same time), and “individualism” (understood as the desire for individual achievement, rather than having one’s accomplishments submerged in those of a group) – lie at the very core of what generates initiative and dynamism in a society – to say nothing of the rational pursuit of truth.

While stress on the benefits of individual achievement may well be more characteristic of modern Western, liberal societies, inspired by the teachings of such philosophers as Locke and Montesquieu, the fact that so many individuals of diverse national, ethnic, religious, and racial backgrounds have succeeded in these societies belies any claim that people whose ancestors migrated here from other sorts of society are therefore foreclosed from succeeding in them. 

Indeed, it is precisely the possibilities that the more or less classically liberal regimes in the U.S. and Western Europe offer for personal advancement – in contrast to monarchical, feudal, tribal, or dictatorial regimes – that continues to attract so many immigrants, legal and illegal, to these shores. 

In order to understand Fhagen’s blatantly ideological claims, one must recall her professed expertise in “nigrescence theory.”

“Nigrescence,” according to a 1994 article by one William E. Cross, Jr., published in Science Direct, is “a French term which means the process of becoming Black.” Those who profess expertise in the field “attempt to capture the stages that African Americans traverse when experiencing a major shift in their racial self-identification.” 

We learn from Wikipedia that Cross, born in 1940, was the inventor of the concept of Nigrescence whose work focused on combatting “the negative effects of Western thought and science on the psychology of Black Americans,” specifically by pursuing “psychological liberation under conditions of oppression” through the development of a distinctive black “identity.”

In other words, Cross, along with his follower Fhagen, is an “identitarian” – one who would steer blacks and other self-designated “minority” members into what liberal political scientist Yascha Mounk calls “The Identity Trap” – the title of Mounk’s 2023 book by the same, which I warmly recommend.

But how can black Americans possibly benefit from being taught to reject “science” or objectivity for the sake of having a distinct identity? Is it not in the very nature of science to be open to investigation and inquiry by all human beings, without regard to any attributes other than their having rational faculties? 

Identitarianism is a ruinous path for underprivileged citizens seeking to advance in life – or anyone else – to follow. But it can be terribly advantageous for self-interested racial “advocates” like Cross (whose work has earned him all sorts of awards) and his epigone Fhagen. Colleges that follow their advice are doing all their students, whatever their socioeconomic or racial background, a grave disservice.

But the war on testing and grading, advanced in the name of “diversity,” continues apace in other areas of American life besides the academy. In a little-noticed move in 2022, the U.S. State Department announced a fundamental change in the process of admitting candidates to eligibility for positions in the Foreign Service.

In a press release, the Department explained that in order to meet Secretary of State Anthony Blinken’s “goals to modernize American diplomacy, win the competition for talent, and ensure that all applicants can present a full picture of their individual qualifications,” the Department would move “away from the Foreign Service Officer Test” (the FSOT, a demanding examination that had been largely unchanged in form since the 1930s) “as a pass/fail gateway test,” in favor of “a more holistic” selection process that would “focus on a candidate’s education and experience.” 

Starting that June, all candidates would “proceed to the Qualification Evaluations Panel (QEP) where their performance on the FSOT will be one factor taken into consideration along with the Personal Narratives submitted during the registration process.” The QEP then “reviews each candidate’s work history, education, experience, and six brief written narratives based on FS core precepts,” all of which supposedly promise to “give the Department a more balanced view of candidates who will be selected for the next phase of the selection process, the Foreign Service Oral Assessment (FSOA).”

Those familiar with the evasions long used by colleges and universities to justify racial preferences in their admissions and hiring processes will rightly smell a rat here. In fact, the Department’s announcement of the new selection process even acknowledges that “taking a holistic view” as will now be done “introduces subjectivity” into the review process, which “may also lead to some inconsistencies in assessment.”

One doesn’t have to read very closely between the lines to recognize that the de-emphasis on test performance, combined with the term “holistic” and the reliance on unspecified “written narratives based on foreign service core precepts,” are just euphemisms for racial and ethnic favoritism. Ironically, this is a return to the way that Foreign Service Officers were selected prior to the FSOT, when those who won the coveted posts were largely white graduates of elite prep schools that funneled their “best and brightest” to the Ivies, which themselves discriminated on the basis of race and religion, only with different groups now being favored. 

It is to be hoped that some group akin to the organizations that challenged the use of racial preferences on behalf of citizens’ equal legal and Constitutional rights in the Fair Admissions case will take a closer look at the Foreign Service’s new recruitment policy – and any other system of racial preferences now being foisted on the American people. In the case of the Foreign Service, the entire nation’s well-being depends on the recruitment of those individuals objectively best qualified to represent us.

David Lewis Schaefer is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science at College of the Holy Cross.

We hope you've enjoyed this article. While you're here, we have a small favor to ask...

The AMAC Action Logo

Support AMAC Action. Our 501 (C)(4) advances initiatives on Capitol Hill, in the state legislatures, and at the local level to protect American values, free speech, the exercise of religion, equality of opportunity, sanctity of life, and the rule of law.

Donate Now
Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
42 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Awakened
Awakened
19 days ago

I don’t want a DEI doctor treating me nor a DEI pilot flying me anywhere. Merit counts where it should count highest. Positions based on Equity are dangerous to all.

John Shipway
John Shipway
19 days ago

STOP WASTING MONEY AND GOING DEEPLY INTO “FOREVER DEBT” BY SIMPLY CEASING TO ATTEND LIBERAL ARTS COLLEGES.
If you find a need to actually learn something and start making money upon graduation, attend a technical school, a community college. LEARN something! Upon graduation you can sign on with an actual skilled tech in whatever trade you chose and go to work as an apprentice. This pays pretty decently and that pay increases as you progress. When you complete your apprenticeship my God the world is your oyster. Ever had to call a plumber or an electrician? How about getting your car repaired? Those folks make a LOT of money and as the population ages the demand for skilled tech workers will skyrocket along with the pay for their services.
Or you can “experiment” with gay sex or even go whole hog and chop your pecker or breasts off while spending 8 years trying to get a BA in racial disparities and spend a lifetime crawling up the employment ladder at I-Hop…….

Philip Seth Hammersley
Philip Seth Hammersley
19 days ago

Would anyone really want a person who passed simply by attending class performing surgery or flying an airplane (or anything else)? How STUPID can some people be?

Thinking
Thinking
19 days ago

No grading makes universities baby sitting institution and we taxpaying people are paying for it with ole Joe’s mandate to pay off all student loans. The dumbing down of America has been reached. We always had the lowest rating in education in the world and over the past 50 years it has gotten worse till now when merit means nothing to the left. But if you are trans or any gender that the person decides he or she is, you are hired. The plan is to make sheep out of all of us. Just follow the leader, don’t think, they will do that for you. Don’t have an opinion they will decide what you will think. With all this UNgrading at the university level makes these institutions nothing more than warehouses to prepare them to become slaves for the left. We have seen what dumbing down of our leaders does to America, it destroys it. That is why nothing has happened in America the past three years and they blame it on Trump and those MAGA terroristen. Ole Joe and his cabinet are a bunch of puppets. Nobody has any vision for America or its people. Now if you lived in the Ukraine you would feel old Joe’s largesse. Especially Zelensky and his Oligarchs. And people on a pension. Ukrainians who fled to other European countries were bused free of charge to vacation in Kyiv and then bused back, free of charge, to their respective asylum countries. I think the poor citizens of these countries would like to have the same possibilities only they haven’t suffered enough, so they don’t get it. Just like here de migrants get everything and poor Americans are starving or become homeless because they can’t pay their bills. Philanthropic organization quit supporting local programs and sending their donations overseas. What is wrong with this picture. And we allow it. The homeless and drug problems have risen five fold. Is anything done about it? Ole Joe he has no idea. Was shocked to learn a smoothie was $6.00. So keep on dumbing down America. Keep quiet and most of all allow ole Joe to blame Trump for everything that ole Joe himself has botched. Someone should ask him: who is the president of the USA? I think he’ll say Trump. At least Kamala.

Richard
Richard
19 days ago

All part of the “dummy”down plan.

Paul W
Paul W
19 days ago

Maybe those proposing “ungrading” have a point. It’s plainly obvious that grades required to obtain their “advanced” degrees meant absolutely nothing to indicate their level of intelligence…or complete lack thereof! Western society is dead; dead and buried…deeply!

David Millikan
David Millikan
19 days ago

Excellent article. They continue to attack Merit because they are STUPID and want the public STUPID cause it’s the only way they can CONTROL you while giving our enemies the advantage over you.
Bottom line, that’s how they make you SLAVES that don’t question anything and our enemies become your BOSS.

Stephen Russell
Stephen Russell
19 days ago

Then they wont qualify for jobs etc alone & we suffer
Let Dems suffer with DEI in thier lives then see changes come

Bob
Bob
19 days ago

United States of America, a nation of the unqualified!!!!!!

anna hubert
anna hubert
19 days ago

Merit excellence diligence honesty and honor are white supremacies and will not be tolerated in an equal and just society The results of that policy are everywhere we look and it does the least good to those that it was created for

Owen
Owen
19 days ago

Swell, I want my next car/plane/bridge/bldg designed by those who could not pass an engineering course. MY Dr., als, I would want to be qualified, before he/she opens me up.
Getting rid of objective grading is foolish and will aid in the collapse of society.

Jim
Jim
19 days ago

In order to save our great Constitutional Republic, The United States of America, I believe we need an armed revolution and a new, very large prison to hold all the politicians, bureaucrats and others guilty of treason, insurrection or sedition against our country. Elections won’t solve America’s problems because too many have their hands out for money from hard working American taxpayers.

Granny
Granny
19 days ago

So we’re reduced to giving every person who walks in and out of a college door a ‘participation ribbon?’ So now, EVERYBODY can graduate from Harvard and Yale. Yeah! Go for it! More pathetic decisions by the supposed adults running universities and our country, for that matter.

teresa
teresa
19 days ago

he should be impeached and hung while they are at it. also, the four rinos who voted to not have myorkas impeached should go

Wayne
Wayne
19 days ago

In other words the dummies will graduate with high scores and get jobs that they are not qualified for.

Patriot Will
Patriot Will
19 days ago

If our country promotes more and more people on the bases of race, sex, and sexual preferences — then our country is going to keep on becoming more and more dysfunctional. Everyone is a loser if merit is not the main standard in rewarding behavior and achievement. If we want a vibrant country with vibrant people and a vibrant economy, then we want the spirit of our country to be full of hard-working, high achieving, competent citizens who do their absolute best to be all that they can be. Otherwise, we will soon implode and destroy ourselves and become a third rate nation of drones and malcontents. Tragically, many Marxist Democrats do not have pride in the United States of America and are allowing our country to self-destruct through the sins of apathy and ignorance.

Robert Zuccaro
Robert Zuccaro
19 days ago

The Biden Administration is violating their own equity hiring policies: they’re only hiring incompetent morons. Come on! Give a smart competent person a shot, Joe!

Larry
Larry
19 days ago

Our nation and peoples continue to be led in the wrong direction by the corrupted “woke” administrators and elected officials. One step down a steep and slippery path to the point of no recovery. YET, “We the People” can refuse to follow, and refuse to buy into this perverted DEI program/mindset.

TPG
TPG
19 days ago

It seems lately that most of the people in “Education”, either “higher” or K-12, have never been educated. Or, at least, they all majored in “What Mind Altering Substance Can I Abuse Next?”

Papa John
Papa John
19 days ago

Instead of people meeting standards, Now they want to lower standards to accommodate the lowest common denominator. This is bad for everyone. Want a heart surgeon who received passing grades but has no idea what he’s doing operating on you. How about engineers that design the buildings we live in or bridges we cross? Wat some dummy that was passed through for how they looked designing these things for you?

sue
sue
19 days ago

Boy oh boy! Can you see who is going to play this! I think helicopter parents are going to love this method. In this case nobody wins. It turns everyone into a nonproductive, not responsible crybaby. Grow up and get a life. You are seeing what goes through the mind of a highly educated person.. too smart for their own good….bet they can’t even teach..Got mush for brains

Centurion
Centurion
18 days ago

Looks like employers will have to attach tests to their applications. Since college degrees are now worthless employers will need to do their own testing to see if a candidate is smart enough to do the job.

Elena
Elena
18 days ago

Where is the pride in getting a degree or a position that you know you didn’t earn or are qualified for? I know someone who was elevated at work even though they’re lazy, has time theft, calls in every month throughout the month, doesn’t know policy and procedures but spouts off nonsense, makes poor decisions, and all because of their color. This is hurting our customer base and is dangerous. And the people who are dependable, work hard, and are conscientious, have to do that person’s work for them. And anyone who speaks up faces retaliation. Social credit score in action. Pathetic.

Carol
Carol
18 days ago

The dumbing down of society continues!

Elena
Elena
18 days ago

Anybody remember the book ‘China Cry’? This is communism in the works

Deborah R. Evans
Deborah R. Evans
19 days ago

I have advocated for this for long…….

An older blonde women laughing in the kitchen with a grey haired man.
AMAC’s Medicare Advisory Service
The knowledge, guidance, and choices of coverage you’re looking for. The exceptional service you deserve.
The AMAC App on 3 different iPhone
Download the AMAC App
The AMAC App is the place to go for insightful news wherever you are and whenever you want.
International Women s Day was celebrated in Kunar Afghanistan. Over 300 Women particpated to hear speeches on women s rights in the war torn country.
Magic Dream Big message on sunny road
Donald Trump
police tape, migrant crime in cities

Stay informed! Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter.

"*" indicates required fields

42
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Subscribe to AMAC Daily News and Games