Trump: Health Care Reform Vote After GOP Win in 2020

Trump Health Care reform GOP 2020 votePresident Donald Trump said Republican health care reform will only come after the 2020 election when, the president assumed, the GOP will retake the House of Representatives and have enough votes to pass a replacement of the Affordable Care Act, also called Obamacare.

“Everybody agrees that ObamaCare doesn’t work. Premiums & deductibles are far too high—Really bad HealthCare!” Trump said in a series of tweets on April 1. “Even the Dems want to replace it, but with Medicare for all, which would cause 180 million Americans to lose their beloved private health insurance.”

He went on to say that “the Republicans are developing a really great HealthCare Plan with far lower premiums (cost) & deductibles than ObamaCare.”
“In other words it will be far less expensive & much more usable than ObamaCare,” he said. “Vote will be taken right after the Election when Republicans hold the Senate & win back the House.”

Both parties generally agree that health care has gotten too expensive. Moreover, national health spending will grow at 5.5 percent a year on average from 2018 to 2027, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services estimated in a February study.

Each party offers a different way to bring the prices down.

Government Control

A significant portion of Democratic lawmakers, including all leading presidential candidates, support “Medicare for All” or a single-payer, government-run health care.

Expanding Medicare to cover all Americans would cost an estimated $32 trillion over 10 years and would require substantial tax hikes.

Less Regulation Vs. Pre-existing Conditions

Trump would like to do the opposite—reduce government regulation to increase competition in the market.

“He wants the people that are receiving the care to get to make decisions about it,” White House press secretary Sarah Sanders told Fox News on April 2.

Trump has insisted, however, the plan must include protections for patients with pre-existing conditions—the most popular part of Obamacare.

“Republicans will always support Pre-Existing Conditions,” he said. “The Republican Party will be known as the Party of Great HealtCare [sic].”

Such protections would require government intervention, such as subsidized insurance for several million people with pre-existing conditions who could neither get insured through their employers, nor afford premiums on the individual market.

GOP Senate Team

Trump said on March 28 that he asked Sens. John Barroso (R-Wyo.), Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Rick Scott (R-Fla.), and some others to put together a health care plan to replace Obamacare.

The lawmakers are to “come up with something that’s really spectacular, maybe will even get support in the House from Democrats,” he said.

Trump, however, doesn’t appear to have much hope in brokering a deal with the Democrats.

“He’d love to be able to address it now, but we know that Democrats are controlled by the far, radical left wing of their party and they are a total contrast to what we need and what the president wants to see happen when it comes to health care,” Sanders said.

In the absence of legislative action, the administration plans to tweak the health care system within the power of the executive branch, Sanders said.

Trump has already put pressure on drug companies to reduce prices. The prescription drug price index has dropped by nearly a percent from January to February, the largest decrease ever in the seasonally adjusted data reaching back to 1969. Compared to February 2018, the index is down almost 1.2 percent, the largest drop since 1972.

Obamacare in Legal Jeopardy

In a March 25 federal court filing, the Justice Department sided with a federal judge in Texas who ruled Obamacare unconstitutional. The case is expected to reach the Supreme Court, and if the law is indeed struck down, it would significantly deregulate the individual insurance market and withdraw a slew of taxes and subsidies. Such a scenario would likely escalate the pressure on Congress to enact some form of health care reform.

Reprinted with permission from - The Epoch Times - by Petr Svab

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Robert N
3 years ago

Here are some quick ways to improve healthcare for U.S. citizens:

1) Disallow taxes on non-optional healthcare… all of it.
2) Allow all healthcare to be written off including payments to plans
3) Create tax free before tax healthcare accounts
4) Allow U.S. citizens to move from Medicare to healthcare tax savings accounts including moving medicare paycheck deductions to the healthcare account
5) Give a 101% write-off for contributions to one’s own before tax tax free healthcare account IF they opt out of Medicare
6) Allow U.S. citizens to redirect their required minimum distributions to the tax free healthcare and their required death distributions for those who inherit this requirement. The goal is to help U.S. citizens save for healthcare and cover all its costs tax free.
7) Allow people a 101% tax deduction for contributions to non-profit 100% U.S. citizen owned/controlled regional hospitals and urgent care facilities.
8) Allow U.S. citizens to have before tax tax free savings account for long-term care and extended care.

The goal her would be to move people from government to individual control and to move the healthcare industry from profit to non-profit and eliminate the middlemen and overhead costs they and bureaucracy bring. These numbers can be tweaked to enhance the move… but the elimination of taxes on the money spent alone is a shot in the arm.

3 years ago

With positive outcomes coming from the courts, the Dump Obamacare movement is gaining ground. We HAVE to work to retake the House in 2020, as well as reelect President Trump.

The only way to keep costs “reasonable” is to open up health care and the insurance markets to the private sector. As much of this sector as possible should be open to the competitive pressures that are absent in government-run programs. Competition drives down prices; government programs take your money and waste much of it. Obamacare, for example, required each policy to include coverage for a dozen or so issues, regardless of a family’s situation, driving up deductibles. Even though our children are grown, our insurance policies REQUIRED coverage for pediatric dentistry. Even though most of us are not addicted to drugs, our policies REQUIRED coverage for substance abuse programs. Etc., etc… Maybe these nonsensical “must-haves” can be whittled away in the same manner that the individual mandate was excised.

We’ll never get rid of Medicare and Medicaid, so government intervention is a fact of life. (I’m wondering if Medicaid can be rolled into Medicare, and end some of the redundancies.) Insuring pre-existing conditions will probably require government regulations, unless the insurance industry can be counted on to regulate itself. To the extent that the private sector can come up with less expensive solutions to problems, they will. But the president should invite MANY more experts in various fields to work together, and even include a few from the private sector and from across the aisle. We’d be more likely to gather a few democrat votes if that happens. Only one or two D votes could swing the outcome.

Dan W.
3 years ago

Wait, didn’t the GOP just have two years with control of the White House, the Senate, and the House of Representatives. Maybe every detail of the GOP health care plan can’t pass tomorrow, but at least put the plan out there and let’s get the discussion going.

3 years ago
Reply to  Dan W.

We both know that the GOP controlled House and Senate in 2017 didn’t really want to take on the issue of repealing Obamacare and were just trying to stall and run out the clock with the expectation Trump would be forced from office within six months or a year. They all thought Hillary was a lock to be elected, so repealing Obamacare was merely empty campaign talk. Neither Ryan or McConnell were killing themselves to get something well crafted done. It became quite obvious after watching Congress in the first two months of 2017, that the GOP never had devoted any time from 2010 to 2016 to fashioning an alternative to Obamacare. No one in D.C. apparently thought Trump would win and they would be have to deliver on that GOP promise.

Based on McConnell already saying he won’t be holding any debates on repealing Obamacare before the 2020 election, that tells me there still isn’t a “plan” to even discuss. My sense is once the repeal effort collapsed in 2017, the GOP leadership sighed in relief and we’re happy to simply move on. Not devoting another minute to thinking about it. Was that all a stupid response on their part? Of course! Yet most of Washington functions on doing very little for long stretches of time. Fund raising and campaigning fir the next re-election cycle is what most members of Congress spend at least 70 percent of their time on.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x