Newsline

Elections , Newsline

Democrats Charged With Election Fraud Amid Party’s Efforts to Obstruct Election Integrity Measures

Posted on Tuesday, February 25, 2025
|
by Outside Contributor
|
27 Comments
|
Print

Democrats are facing new charges of election fraud going back to 2021, despite their party pushing back on election integrity and voter fraud claims since the 2020 presidential election. 

While Democrats have long criticized Republicans who are concerned about election integrity by smearing them with the pejorative label “election deniers,” new allegations regarding election fraud are being made against Democrats. Five Democratic Party members in Bridgeport, Conn., and Philadelphia have been criminally charged with numerous counts of voter fraud on both the state and federal levels regarding mail-in ballots. 

Bridgeport had to redo primary and general elections last year after evidence surfaced of alleged ballot harvesting in the Democratic mayoral primary in September 2023. 

Ballot harvesting

The incumbent Democratic mayor, whose supporter was the reason for the redo elections after allegedly committing ballot harvesting, won the redo elections. The mayor denied any knowledge of the alleged ballot harvesting. The Democratic Connecticut secretary of the state sent multiple referrals of alleged election malfeasance to State Elections Enforcement Commission from the redo general election last February.

Bridgeport Democratic Town Committee Vice Chairperson Wanda Geter-Pataky, and Bridgeport Democratic City Council Members Alfredo Castillo, Jazmarie Melendez, and Maria Pereira were all criminally charged, as well as a woman from Stratford. Geter-Pataky has the most criminal charges against her, with 92 in total, including 42 counts of Possession of Ballots and Envelopes Restricted.

Other charges filed against the five people accused include fraudulent voting, being present while voters filled out those ballots, and misrepresenting who is eligible to vote absentee.

Castillo and Geter-Pataky were criminally charged last year for allegedly taking possession of voters’ absentee ballots during Bridgeport’s 2019 Democratic mayoral primary.

Being targeted for “political retribution” 

“The Office of the Chief State’s Attorney takes allegations of voter fraud seriously and I commend the Statewide Prosecution Bureau’s investigative efforts that resulted in these arrests,” Chief State’s Attorney Patrick Griffin said in a statement on Friday.

“To protect the integrity of our voting process in Connecticut, it is important that our elections are fair and free from fraudulent activity and criminal intent. These prosecutions hopefully send the message that deters tampering with election results in the future in Connecticut.”

The respective lawyers for Geter-Pataky and Pereira declined to comment when reached by the Associated Press on Friday. Pereira said while leaving the police station on Friday that she was going to win the case. Castillo’s attorney said his client plans to plead not guilty.

Melendez’s lawyer said that his client “categorically denies the baseless allegation” and is being targeted for “political retribution.” He also said that since Melendez was only charged with mispresenting people’s eligibility to vote absentee, prosecutors would have to prove that she deliberately did it, which he believes it “highly, highly doubtful” that Melendez did so.

The woman from Stratford who was charged has been unable to be reached for comment. All five charged in the 2023 election matter are to appear in Bridgeport Superior Court on March 6th.

“Since the beginning of this investigation, the CT Democratic Party has said the law is clear about how to handle absentee ballots and ensure that voters rights are not violated,” Roberto Alves, the new chairman of the Connecticut Democratic Party, said in a statement on Friday. “If individuals are found guilty of election-related violations, they will be held accountable and have no place in party leadership.”  

In Millbourne, a Philadelphia suburb of about 1,200 people, three politicians were indicted by a federal grand jury last Tuesday for attempting to win a 2021 mayoral race by illegally casting about three dozen mail-in ballots.

Allegedly forged voter signatures

Mohammed Nurul Hasan, who was vice president of the borough council, Mohammed Munsur Ali, who had won the Democratic primary for borough council, and Mohammed Rafikul Islam, who lost the Democratic primary that year in seeking to be reelected to the council, all allegedly conspired to register people to vote in the election who lived outside of Millbourne.

Hasan had lost the Democratic mayoral primary that year and ran as a write-in candidate in the general election that fall. He lost the general election, 165 votes to 138. Hasan, Ali, and Islam had mail-in ballots sent to them, then completed and returned the ballots to the Delaware County elections board.

The federal grand jury alleged that Hasan and Ali told friends who lived outside Millbourne to register in the municipality and “that they would not get in trouble as long as they did not vote in another election in November 2021,” according to the indictment. However, other voters were unknowingly registered to vote in Millbourne, per the grand jury.

The three men allegedly forged voter signatures on return envelopes and are charged with fraudulent voter registration, false information in registering, and conspiracy.

Islam’s lawyer, Robert Keller, said Friday that his client is “the least culpable” of the three, according to the indictment, and that Islam is only accused of aiding in the scheme “in a minor way.” Islam has agreed to turn himself in to the court, Keller said.

“He has no prior record. He’s a U.S. citizen. He’s lived an honorable life and we’re going to do everything we can to protect his interests and see what kind of case the government has, and then act accordingly,” he added.

Hasan and Ali could not be reached for comment and did not have lawyers listed.

Jim Allen, the Delaware County elections director, told the Philadelphia Inquirer last week that the prosecutions should be a deterrent to others tempted to commit voter fraud.

“I view this as evidence that investigators are not going to let passage of time or the lack of an impact on the election result prevent them from pursuing the case, however long it takes,” Allen said.

Twice losing Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has repeatedly said that the election was “stolen” from her. She has often declared Trump was an “illegitimate president” and suggested that “he knows that he stole the 2016 presidential election.” 

However, multiple Democrats sued each other over alleged election fraud in 2023 and dozens of them have claimed election fraud and irregularities since at least the 2000 presidential election

Reprinted with permission from Just The News by Natalia Middlestadt.

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of AMAC or AMAC Action.

Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
27 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jimmy Page
Jimmy Page
1 hour ago

All one has to see is the graph showing Dem and Repub voter levels from 2016, 2020, and 2024 … there is a 10 MILLION VOTER spike for Biden in 2020… which drops back to historic norms in 2024. A 10 million voter spike from a guy who campaigned from his basement !!! We have the 3 branches now … PUT VOTER REFORM THRU BEFORE 2026.

VikkiC
VikkiC
1 hour ago

Holy Smokes!!! Democrats committing election fraud? Who’da thunk? I would have been surprised if they were found NOT committing election fraud!!

Donna
Donna
2 hours ago

Anyone surprised?

Bacon Nivison
Bacon Nivison
1 hour ago

The demons in their element. Rats indeed!

Wayne Peterkin
Wayne Peterkin
1 hour ago

The sad truth is that a lot of election fraud simply can’t be proven because there is no audit trail to follow. It can be prevented by solid, reasonable, and sensible measures such as in person voting with ID and proof of citizenship and residence to register. Absentee balloting usually has some pretty fair assurances of validity, but generalized mail-in balloting has no such audit trail of verification that the ballot was completed without coercion by the one and only intended voter. Mail-in voting along with ballot harvesting and unsecured drop-boxes are ripe for fraud that simply cannot be proven after the fact. The instances illustrated in this article are welcome, but they are not even the tip of the iceberg. I have said repeatedly that no nation dependent on democratic elections, as ours is, will survive if the people can’t trust election results to be honest and fair. Ours are not, the 2020 election was the worst ever, and we have seen only modest improvement while those most likely to benefit from a tainted election fight every effort to ensure honesty.

PoorObama
PoorObama
1 hour ago

Go figure. Birds of the same feather.
Pretty much the entire Democratic Party is corrupt!

OldConservativeGuy
OldConservativeGuy
1 hour ago

This is a test for the new administration. Is anyone going to jail?

anna hubert
anna hubert
1 hour ago

Are there names attached to those findings, are there sentences attached to those names?

Thinking
Thinking
1 hour ago

When the dems are doing something illegal. The first thing they say. Can you prove intent? Excuse me if you coerced people voting your way. Intent is already proven. What H said after the 2016 election was the same idiotic statement. Then she proceeded to put together the Steele dossier. She deleted 30,000 emails from her server. No charges. But the election was stolen from her. When Trump cited fraud with tge 2020 election she called him an election denier. She did the same in 2016 only she called it a theft. To this day they call Trump’s call of fraud a lie. Like the Jan 6 is a lie that it was an armed attack to take over the capitol. Nobody killed anybody. The capital police killed Ashley Babbitt. None of those entering the capitol did anything. 5 hours afterwards the congress was back to count the electoral votes. Some coup. The truth of what the dems have been up to since 2008 will come out. We have already found hundreds of things in just 4 weeks. How much more will they find in the next 4 years. Be afraid democrats be very afraid. The people are in charge and we are coming for you. Remember Chuckie? You threatened the Supreme Court judges that way and almost got one killed. And you call Elon or Trump dangerous?

Terri Matson
Terri Matson
45 minutes ago

Meanwhile in Arizona: In 2024, Kati Hobbs stole an election she was in charge of! She stole the election from Kari Lake. 2020 election had a movie made about the cheating called 2000 Mules. Too many leftists from Seattle bailing out of their own State to ruin Phoenix and Arizona. That’s the problem with the Left: They poop in their nest and then relocate to a Red State and vote for the same stupid stuff they just escaped from.

Charlotte Mahin
Charlotte Mahin
21 minutes ago

The more of the “deep state” President Trump and Musk are uncovering, the more sick to my stomach I become. I knew the radical leftists were illegally affecting the outcomes of elections….they have been for many years now. With USAID now totally uncovered, we begin to see just how corrupt these Marxists are. Then today, out comes the disgusting DEI emails sent by employees in the FBI that show sickening genital discussions and worse relating to transgenders. These people are truly depraved and morally bankrupt! I am so glad that all of this corruption and the people engaging in it are ALL fired and prosecuted. God help us!!!

Philip Seth Hammersley
Philip Seth Hammersley
32 minutes ago

DIMMs have been fraudsters for decades. Go back to Boss Tweed in NYC, William Daley in Chicago, Frank Rizzo in Philly, etc. LBJ stole his first congressional seat and JFK [through his daddy] stole the presidency from Nixon in 1960.

Joe
Joe
55 minutes ago

Throw the book at ’em!!!!

Nick
Nick
35 minutes ago

I am shocked! The Democrats doing something illegal and unethical? Be still in my heart

Linder
Linder
1 hour ago

And we were called sore losers and crazy.

Mark
Mark
1 hour ago

I’ll bet THAT IF every one of these lying, low-life sleaze bags were sentenced to 20 years in prison, corrupt, election fraud and abuse would come to a screeching halt. Make examples out of these deadbeat criminals.
Of course, this will NEVER happen, and that’s EXACTLY WHY IT WILL CONTINUE BECAUSE NOBODY THAT COULD DROP THE HAMMER ON THESE LOSERS, ARE SPINELESS.
PURE INSANITY

Susan
Susan
4 minutes ago

Geeee Democrats said there is no election fraud!

Dot whitley
Dot whitley
9 minutes ago

What kind of sneaky excuse is this is what I meant.

Dot whitley
Dot whitley
11 minutes ago

If a person is guilty of election fraud, it doesn’t matter if he has had an honest past. Every criminal that’s guilty of any crime had to break the law beginning at number one. He’s as guilty as anybody else who has committed a crime. What kind f sneaky excuse is this?

jewish star; antisemitism on college campuses from professors
U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks before signing an executive order on expanding access to IVF at his Mar-a-Lago resort.
Elon Musk DOGE
bureaucrats throwing money down the drain

Stay informed! Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter.

"*" indicates required fields

27
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Subscribe to AMAC Daily News and Games