Bureaucrats cheat taxpayers. The Federal Government is not a business. Employees do not lose their jobs when work is unfinished, performance subpar, or they fail to show up. They do not get fired if money is diverted, false invoices are paid, bids exceed market, promises are broken, deliveries are late, employees are bribed, and money is wasted. For decades, no one cared. Bureaucrats cheat – here’s how.
As a former congressional oversight investigator for five years, later managing two billion dollars at State for George W. Bush and Colin Powell, I was empowered to find that waste, restore accountability, reprogram money, end cozy contractor relationships, and claw money back. I did.
In the process, I learned 10 ways the bureaucracy and contractors cheat the taxpayers:
Trick One: Hide the money. When I got to State, after years of oversight investigations, I knew their tricks. One of the most notorious was ambassadors and senior staff skimming money for pet projects, for purposes unrelated to what money was appropriated for.
In short, we pay taxes, which are put in a bank. Congress takes that money – borrowing more than collected – to pay for programs and projects. This is the appropriation process.
After money is appropriated, it goes to OMB or the White House, where it is apportioned to departments. Cabinet secretaries give the money they get to assistant secretaries who give it to program managers who, with procurement officers, “obligate” it to contractors, who are later paid.
So, what is the bureaucrats’ trick? They hide money they cannot spend, “obligating” it to escrow accounts run by friendly contractors, which lets them spend it on whatever they want later.
Trick two: Favor friends. Since bureaucrats spend their lives in cubicles with “yes/no” power over contracts, regulations, and how money is spent, they favor contractors friendly to them, who give them things, take them places, get close to them, make them feel important, and imply future jobs.
How do they do this? Dozens of ways, unnoticed by Congress, unknown to The People. They pretend to abide by laws requiring “free and open competition” by “inviting” others to compete, and then – funny thing – their friends win. Over and over.
They do not object when favored contractors overprice services, or add task orders to contracts without competition. They look the other way when deliveries are late, and failures are improperly reported.
They permit general invoicing, no specifics – even if required – on hundreds of thousands, then millions and billions in unchecked invoices. Unless stopped by an oversight investigator, inspector general, whistleblower, or Justice Department, all goes unnoticed.
In egregious cases, false invoices are presented, and paid, no questions asked. Why? The federal government has 2000 departments, agencies, commissions, three million employees, and maybe ten million contractors and subcontractors – too many white rabbits to chase.
Trick three: Salary doubling. Federal contractors – unlike the private sector – can double the price of an employee hired on a personal services basis, with no competition. If a bureaucrat wants to hire someone for $100,000 – maybe a friend – they use an existing contractor, or a “body shop,” to sign them, then pay another $100,000 to the contractor
Trick four: Insider Inspectors General. While much is made of inspector generals, who are supposed to audit and protect taxpayers, we are obviously being underserved. Reasons are several. Agency heads and Congress often do not insist on oversight. Otherwise, IG reports to no one. Often, they are the bureaucracy. Much gets by, why Reagan removed 16 and Trump removed 17.
Trick five: Sub stiffing. Contractors create a team, win a contract with a collection of subcontractors, then pay them less or do not use them, maximizing profit margins – at the expense of promised outcomes. Since bureaucrats see success as money spent, no need for oversight.
Trick six: “I See Nothing.” While the False Claims Act allows the government to recover from dishonest contractors, falsity must be reported and pursued – by the bureaucrats. With 6.75 trillion spent in 2024, only 2.9 billion was recovered. Common theme? “I see nothing.”
Trick seven: Find, fine, rehire. Too often, when major fraud is discovered and gets around, it produces a fine, but that is it. The process does not include firing the offender. They pay a fine and get rehired.
Trick eight: Job bribes. Contractors want to win money. With Trump on the hunt, that clicking sound is emails are being deleted across the entire bureaucracy. Look at contracts left by mid-level bureaucrats, then look at where they end up working later. You find a non-trivial correlation.
Trick nine: Yearend Slush. Notice how the federal budget – and state budgets – keep rising. They do because leaders are irresponsible and want to spend, and bureaucrats have an unspoken rule: Spend everything, wildly if needed, so nothing is left over – because next year’s number depends on it.
Trick ten: Keep poor records. Poor records, unreported integrity violations, looking the other way is how cheats help cheats. The federal government recorded 109,000 contracts in 2023. GAO investigators found major gaps in integrity reporting, and fewer reported breaches by half in 2022 and 2023 than in 2019 and 2020. Interesting, eh? Administrations changed in 2021.
Bottom line: The bureaucracy has a long-established system and unwritten rules. These rules allow them to keep power, jobs, and influence, redirect money without oversight, and cheat taxpayers. That is about to stop – and why you hear all these gnashing of teeth.
Robert Charles is a former Assistant Secretary of State under Colin Powell, former Reagan and Bush 41 White House staffer, attorney, and naval intelligence officer (USNR). He wrote “Narcotics and Terrorism” (2003), “Eagles and Evergreens” (2018), and is National Spokesman for AMAC. Robert Charles has also just released an uplifting new book, “Cherish America: Stories of Courage, Character, and Kindness” (Tower Publishing, 2024).
More proof that government is so bloated that no one can have accurate oversight for anything. Departments budgets with the mentality of use or lose has been the norm since inception. When government shuts down for the lack of a congressional budget, the non-essential government employees are furloughed, start there. To paraphrase Nancy Pelosi, “We have to pass the bill, to find out what in it”. Eliminating a non-essential worker so you can see if it’s necessary might be the only way to drain this part of the swamp.
RBC,
Since I worked for a period of time for the federal government, I agree with everything in this article. Spot on in everything described.
One avenue you missed or just glossed over is the old “prime vendor” scam when it comes to RFIs and RFPs. You kind of referenced it in Trick Two, but its where massive amounts of taxpayer dollars are handed over to the same small group of vendors (companies) over and over again. All after the vendor’s on-site personnel “assist” the government workers in fashioning the requirements for whole projects, that just happen to miraculously match what the vendor sells. All at inflated costs to the taxpayers of this country.
P.S.
I hope somewhere along the way; DOGE does an assessment of the federal government’s entire procurement process. From my time in the federal government, before returning back to the sanity of the private sector, I’ve never seen a more inefficient and overly costly way in which to design, spec and build major projects from the ground up.
These filth steal billions but some stupid punk steals a car and goes to jail. Ive long guessed that the federal (and state) governments need to shrink by two thirds, at least. Now we all know it. Never forget the loudest squealers.
RBC, great piece today on how the Bureaucrats work to steal and hide the taxpayer’s monies. Nice scam.
WOW! Thanks for this eye opening article. So, That is why the LEFT hate Pres. Trump and Elon Musk, the two sent by God to cleanup our corrupt government. Thank you Lord.
This list should be directly shared with the DOGE team.
Experience with the system is valuable. My time supporting the government aligns with this; especially the spending frenzy that happens at the end of the fiscal year. Horrible incentive to get the budget all spent lest you get less next year!
WOW! GREAT ARTICLE!
I’ll bet we could slow down such practices by imposing mandatory life sentences without the possibility of parole, offering the choice of death penalty as an option that the convict could chose. Create the sentencing guideline, convict a handful, carry out sentencing, perp-walk the convicted for the populace and elected to see, then see what happens. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, right?!?!
The federal judiciary is no exception. Worked for a federal judge in CA for 11 years and managed the chambers. Tried numerous times to reduce budget overspending in my department, but was railed at by the chief clerk of the court and ordered to spend my entire budget allowance immediately. I didn’t need half of the allowance allotted.
Thank you again Robert Charles! I certainly hope you will advise Mr. Musk with your lessons learned from your years of experience!
Unbelievable! I think the rot is more widespread than we imagined. Makes me sick.
Number 9 is huge and there is very little ability to change it! I was a non-paid volunteer client liaison to a pilot housing program. The director was brand new in her position and we had great visions for its future! The program started with a huge budget because of all the initial costs that included securing rental units, furnishing the units, establishing utilities, etc. all the normal big expenditures involved when starting any project. After securing rentals we went shopping we outfitted each unit with everything a person with nothing would need to live comfortably, everything from furniture to pots and pans and personal hygiene items. We shopped at discount stores to stretch every dollar and used the tax exemption to save even more. when finished we were quite proud of ourselves because we had spent only about 2/3 of the money budgeted for us. When this was reported instead of getting congratulated we were chastised! Then instructed to spend the balance of the money immediately or risk not receiving enough to prolong the project in the coming years! For the clients, it worked out well because we used the rest of the money to purchase months’ worth of groceries to be delivered weekly to them. For us it was disheartening because we expected if we could show excess funds at the end of the year we would be able to expand the project to service additional clients each year! Boy were we wrong!! This is why when a review of government spending is done there are line items such as toilet seats with a cost of $100+ each, I always wondered why they didn’t just go to Walmart and get them for $30 each, now I know! The rules about this really need to change! Had we been allowed to put that excess toward expansion, our little 30-client project could be serving 70-80 clients by now! These are the types of government waste I would like to see addressed with the DOGE team or even a new specific division opened that would look closer at spending! Personally, I would be willing to volunteer my time for the first year just to show how necessary such a division is to the taxpayers!!
Department of State is one of the biggest offenders. Hope someone is looking there too.
non of this article surprices me,i,ve believed this could be happening for years. Thatd why Musk is there !!!!!
I witnessed trick 9 in the late 70s at the State of PA Public Utility Commission. It went so far as to giving away the balance of office supplies so inventory was zero/budget spent.
The tax payers have been bled dry to support an unelected mafia whose only concern is keeping their own growing, over-funded, hidden, and unaccountable.
Burn it all to the ground, and start over with tighter oversight, limited budgets, and a sharpy reduced workforce.
Excellent breakdown that should be enshrined in DOGE as a permanent department. The question is how to establish it to assure independence. The function needs to operate continuously.
This accounting method should be stopped. Next year’s budget has to reflect expected revenue. Maybe there is no way to know how much it takes, so estimate. Whatever isn’t spent goes back to the treasury.
No one I know runs their personal life that way. Tell them, do any of the prohibitions, you go to jail. PERIOD! Taxpayers need to STOP this criminal enterprise BS and punich those that engag. Where haves the honesty and morals of people gone?
When are the untouchable elite tax money launderer scam artists in Congress going to face Justice??? They stole from the US Treasury! Congress created all these bureaucratic agencies and authorized the spending of our tax money, in the first place. This is suppose to be a Representative government. All of us should be contacting our Congressional Representatives and asking them why they let this happen and what they are doing about it. If they can’t, then consider voting for someone who will. Midterms are coming up.
I remember a relative with the Forest Service specifically alluding to #9 decades ago!
Besides jail time for government thief’s, sell all their assets and put the money to reduce the national debt.
Less than 10% of Wash DC voted for Trump. They are likely the honest ones. All the rest should be fired.
#9 is gospel truth. We used to spend all our money half way through. We then took everyone else’s money for the next 6 months. We had a real mission. They did not.
Really? Only ten ways? OK, I know this article is only so long. The rest is up to our imagination.
Yes, #9 is so true. Worked at a state government office. A pile of briefcases was stacked in a corner of the supply room. These were a good way to quickly spend the end-of-year unused funds. This “trick” is probably one of the maneuvers as to how we ended up with the $10,000 toilet seats!
Trick #9 was practiced where I used to work (at a major corporation).
No zero-based budgeting used.
Whose fault is number 9? Congress has created that…don’t blame employees for that.
Hmm…you say bureaucracy, but it seems that you’re talking about elected officials, their friends, mostly on contracts. You haven’t explained in any way why federal employees should be slashed and burned.
look at the inefficiency and ineffectiveness of govt. look at contracts that are waste and contractors. Then get to cutting federal employees. You literally talked about elected officials, cabinet members, and senior staff. Not rank and file.