Newsline

Newsline , Politics

GENIUS: Trump’s Intel Investment Skyrockets 50 Percent in One Month

Posted on Thursday, October 2, 2025
|
by Mike Marlowe
|
44 Comments
|
Print

For decades, Donald Trump built a business reputation by making bold bets that others were too timid to make. From skyscrapers that reshaped city skylines to golf courses that turned barren wasteland into luxury destinations, he made a career spotting hidden value where the self-proclaimed experts saw only risk. Now President Trump has brought that same instinct to the White House by placing a massive bet on the future of American technology.

Earlier this year, the Trump administration announced that it had negotiated a nearly 10 percent stake in Intel, one of America’s most storied and successful technology companies. But the deal did not simply shower the company with new taxpayer money, as Washington is apt to do; instead, the administration converted funds that had already been granted to Intel with no strings attached under the Biden administration into an equity position. This new arrangement represents a better deal for the public.

More specifically, under the Biden-era CHIPS and Science Act and various other federal support programs for semiconductor manufacturers, Intel was set to get about $9.9 billion in taxpayer funding. But instead of just handing that money over, Trump negotiated a deal where the funds would instead purchase shares of Intel at a discounted price of $20.47 per share, well below where the stock had been trading. And it didn’t cost taxpayers another penny.

Even many conservatives were initially skeptical of the deal, fearing that it represented a step toward a socialist-style command economy. But under the structure of the deal, the government’s shares are passive, meaning that it won’t have board seats or voting rights.

Importantly, however, a special provision of the deal allows the government to purchase additional shares at an even more discounted price if Intel reduces its semiconductor manufacturing output below a certain threshold. This creates a major incentive for Intel to continue accelerating its semiconductor manufacturing, which is a major national security interest for the United States.

The pundits scoffed until the numbers came in. Within just a few weeks, Intel shares surged to around $30 per share – a stunning 50 percent gain for the American people. As of when this article went to print, Intel shares were up even further, to around $34 per share. The “reckless gamble” that the critics mocked has been revealed as yet another Trump masterstroke.

What is most remarkable about the Intel deal is not just the short-term windfall but the larger strategic shift it represents. For decades, Washington’s idea of economic development was little more than corporate welfare: throw billions in subsidies at multinational corporations and hope they create jobs or raise wages – but without any real requirement to do so. As a result, the companies often pocketed the cash, bought back shares of their own stock, outsourced production, and betrayed American workers.

Trump is pioneering an entirely new model that insists the American people share directly in the upside when their money is on the line. It is a model of economic nationalism built on the belief that when the American people risk their capital (or rather, the government risks their capital for them) they deserve to share in the rewards.

Trump’s logic is simple: when U.S. industries are supported for national security reasons, the public, through elected representatives, must retain some measure of influence over the decisions of that industry. Additionally, when American innovation financed by public dollars is sold abroad, taxpayers should get a cut of the profits.

Trump’s negotiations to take “golden shares” in U.S. Steel as a condition for approving the company’s sale to Japan’s Nippon Steel was another example of this ingenious strategy. That deal gave the president unprecedented authority over some company decisions on national security grounds, including the ability to block the closure of existing manufacturing plants and block the offshoring of jobs and factories. In September, President Trump exercised his golden share authority to veto the company’s plan to cease production at an Illinois plant, saving 800 high-paying blue-collar jobs.

Or look at Nvidia, the world’s most valuable chipmaker. Under Trump’s vision, the United States will collect a cut of every sale Nvidia makes in China. Instead of allowing a corporation to get rich selling advanced technology to a strategic rival, Trump is ensuring that those exports return real dollars to the U.S. Treasury to continue funding innovation that keeps America ahead of Beijing.

The administration isn’t stopping there. News reports indicate Trump’s team is also seeking a 10 percent stake in Lithium Americas, the operator of what will soon become the nation’s largest lithium mine. Lithium is a critical national security concern given its use in lithium-ion batteries, which power electronics used in every sector of the modern world, including the military.

Once again, taxpayers would not be on the hook for additional dollars to acquire the stake. Instead, the administration is looking to convert a $2 billion loan the company received from the Department of Energy during the Biden administration into an equity position. The company’s stock price briefly doubled following the news.

Taken together, these moves signal a fundamental transformation of American economic policy. Where past presidents begged corporations to invest, Trump is forcing a new bargain: if you want access to public support, you must give the American people a share of your success.

This is a wholesale reversal of the old order. For decades, Washington elites operated under the belief that government’s role in promoting economic growth was to subsidize corporations even if they shipped jobs overseas or empowered our adversaries. Trump has blown up that consensus. In its place he is building a system that acknowledges that the purpose of a nation’s government and economy is to serve its people.

Trump’s model is really just everyday common sense, but it took his business genius to break through decades of failure and prove that it can work.

Trump’s critics will keep sneering, but results speak louder than ridicule. In one bold stroke after another, he has shown that government can demand accountability, taxpayers can earn real returns, and America’s economy can once again create opportunity for the American people rather than the global elite.

More than anything, President Trump has proven that he never lost the instincts that made him famous. He still understands better than anyone the Art of the Deal – and this time, the American people are his partners in profit.

Mike Marlowe is the pen name of a writer based in Texas.

Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
44 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Patriot 1967
Patriot 1967
8 months ago

Thank you President Trump for running our country like a businees

Max
Max
8 months ago

The last two paragraphs sum up this article nicely and on target.

Linder
Linder
8 months ago

Trump never ceases to amaze me, he my utmost admiration.

James Towns
James Towns
8 months ago

Once again, Trump plays chess, while the others play checkers. Like this writer said at the end, results speak louder than ridicule.  :o)

Scott Burnette
Scott Burnette
8 months ago

He just keeps winning for the true Americans. He constantly makes his critics look stupid and I love it!

rhonda
rhonda
8 months ago

Bravo, President Trump!

Thinking
Thinking
8 months ago

Democrats subsidize businesses and pocket a percentage for themselves. And smugly proclaim they are keeping jobs here. Only it never gets looked into afterwards how many jobs it actually did create.
President Trump uses the subsidies to benefit the people twice. First in creating jobs and the money loaned is in stock to benefit the treasury not the politicians. We are reading this but the protesters and MAGA haters never get to see this. That doesn’t fit in the plans of the progressives. Any success to make America and its citizens prosperous is not a progressive policy. The liberal academia doesn’t teach that. Can you see Harris, AOC, Crockett, Newsom, Walz come up with deals like this? Thank you president Trump you are a leader.

Carol
Carol
8 months ago

This is great if the earnings pays down the debt and you have a government that actually wants to help the people! But Democrats will win an election down the road cuz politics is not static. Once Dems seize control, they will take this open door and railroad their control thru it! This open door is how socialism and real fascism will come to America! I want a small limited government like the Constitution created and government out of the economy! This sounds good now but don’t forget the future for the children coming behind!

Toni
Toni
8 months ago

We needed someone with a good business sense to run this country for a very long time.

Jerry Todd
Jerry Todd
8 months ago

Over 1,000 US corporations are under the thumb of Black Rock. They do this by buying about 9.5% of a corporation with our retirement funds, putting them on the board. Having a major financial hammer, they have forced companies into BLM, LGBTQ, DEI and ESG stances that run counter to the views of the American people.

Carol A Arroyo
Carol A Arroyo
8 months ago

Great article and truth of the matter is that DJT is a genius when it comes to the making of a deal. No one can take that away from him and if people would only take the time to see the accomplishments this Great American has done for the country they would all switch parties to support him! He spends tireless hours upon hours of time in every direction there is a problem so he can correct the current mess and make it better for America. Please pray for this wonderful leader and sitting President and his entire family who are working right behind him to share their gifts and successes with the U.S.

Orion Bennett
Orion Bennett
8 months ago

In 1992 I broke from the fray, and voted in a new direction. Since my first vote in 1974, I followed in the footsteps of my father, and voted a straight republican ticket. He considered himself a Goldwater Republican. I followed in each and every election until 1992, when I voted for Ross Perot. With an example of the USPS … rates rising quality going down … I felt, perhaps what we needed was a business man guiding us. A man who successfully earned a lot of money for himself, using that knowledge, and intuition in making America financially successful.

Sadly, Ross Perot, ran with our unfair system, which will never accept a third party. Meaning sacrificing to join one of the two parties. He got a lot of votes, but they meant nothing, as the electoral college has no 3rd party reps. They vote Republican or Democrat.

Trump got it right, he joined the Republican party, appealed to the true heart of America, so much so that he has been at war with Washington the entire time. But finally ignoring the hate of Washington, his third venture, allowed the people to stand, and he is proving that America can be run like a business, gaining for all of us.

JIM
JIM
8 months ago

LOOKSLIKE IT MIGHT RESULT IN A REDUCTION OF TAXES WE ARE PAYING IF CONGRESS STOPS WASTEFUL SPENDING.

Stuart
Stuart
8 months ago

Great news, I now better understand Trump’s ‘Art of the Deal’

Sam
Sam
8 months ago

How many times over the years have you heard people say “We need a bidnessman in the White House!” Looks like we may have one after all. I voted for him 3 times…suuure hope this all works out…(shrugs shoulders while rolling eyes)

Gregory
Gregory
8 months ago

Long before I heard Trump say it, I said it. “He is always right.” My regret is that he is not younger and won’t be our President for the next 20 years. Oh well. As long as we are fortunate to have a Republican in the White House, President Trump’s voice will be heard.

BEA
BEA
8 months ago

I hope President Trump doesn’t forget the American people his partners in profit, get to enjoy some of the profit. $$$

Stephen Russell
Stephen Russell
8 months ago

How about Govt stake in Big Tech” Facebook, Meta, Linkedin, Google??

Richard
Richard
8 months ago

One Trump life has expired the democrats will be the one world’s party, until son of god feet walk on earth again.

Keith
Keith
8 months ago

Can’t

Keith
Keith
8 months ago

How can I get rid of this annoying AMAC pop up? I can read the article!

Robert
Robert
8 months ago

I suppose you were christened as max u? Your side keeps shooting at us so don’t assume anyone here uses their real names!

C K
C K
7 months ago

Don’t believe everything you read. Duh.
The claim that President Trump “geniusly” negotiated a 10% U.S. government stake in Intel is mostly true — in August 2025, the Trump administration and Intel announced a 9.9% equity stake funded by redirecting existing CHIPS Act grants. But saying the deal “cost taxpayers nothing” is misleading; those CHIPS Act funds are still taxpayer money, merely repurposed into equity that can rise or fall in value. Likewise, the article’s assertion that Intel’s stock “soared 50% in weeks” is false — public market data show only modest, short-term gains after the announcement. The government did buy at $20.47 per share- $4 lower than its sale price, a modest 15–20 percent discount, not the deep under-valuation implied. The supposed “special provision” allowing extra share purchases if Intel cuts chip output is not in the deal — the real clause concerns Intel’s foundry ownership dropping below 51%.

The article’s other claims — that Trump obtained “golden shares” in U.S. Steel, secured a cut of Nvidia’s China sales, or turned loans to Lithium Americas into equity — are unsubstantiated by any credible evidence. Calling the move a guaranteed taxpayer profit or flawless “economic nationalism” is pure opinion, not fact. The Intel stake is real, but the piece exaggerates its success and ignores key risks such as market volatility, dilution, and legal uncertainty over converting grants into equity. In short, it’s a mix of partial truth, heavy spin, and speculation wrapped in political storytelling — not an accurate reflection of the actual policy or its outcomes.

johnh
johnh
8 months ago

I do not think it is good idea for the US government to be investing our tax dollars (or increasing our debt dollars) in public corporations. The govt. has the power to treat companies more favorable that other companies & that is not how America should operate. Time will tell, but Wall Street has operated for years without the government investing in the marker, and so why start now & create loopholes for corruption.

Jo271828
Jo271828
8 months ago

The Federal Government should not own stock in any private sector company. The Government should divest itself of the stock immediately.

The Government’s ownership creates at least the appearance of a conflict of interest.
Is the Government favoring Intel over its competitors?
Why didn’t the Federal Government purchase similar shares in Intel’s competitors?
What about SEC filings? Can the SEC be impartial in looking into the Government’s ownership?
Does the Federal Government get a seat on Intel’s board of directors?
Will Intel be giving preferential treatment when bidding on Government contracts?

johnh
johnh
8 months ago

The USA provides services & protects our constitution for all Americans & is not a business and cannot be run like a business. Both parties need to stop increasing our debt & look back to year 2001 and that was the last year of a balanced budget under President Clinton. For those of you that want USA to be run like a business, how long would your company business last if you increased your debt by
$1 Trillion per year the last 17 years and not file bankruptcy.

Casey Matt
Casey Matt
8 months ago

No one understands that the government being an active part of a private company is called ‘Fascism”?
When Mussolini did it he ended up hanging from a lampost next to his mistress. I guess times and crimes change.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) talks to reporters as he heads for a vote at the U.S. Capitol on June 01, 2026 in Washington, DC.
Columbus Fountain Union Station Washington, DC
House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (R-MO) holds a news conference before a markup hearing in the Longworth House Building on Capitol Hill on May 13, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Abdul El-Sayed, candidate for US Senate in Michigan, speaks before U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) takes the stage at Mumford High School on May 3, 2026 in Detroit, Michigan.

Subscribe to AMAC Daily News and Games

44
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x