Newsline

Politics

“Trump Effect” Boosts U.S. Allies’ Defense Spending Commitments

Posted on Saturday, April 12, 2025
|
by Ben Solis
|
18 Comments
|
Print

President Donald Trump’s success at extracting greater defense spending commitments from U.S. allies was one of the defining achievements of his first term, and he has largely picked up where he left off just a few months into his second go-round in the Oval Office. After some initial grumbling, nations from Europe to the Far East are one by one falling in line.

In the Pacific, where China continues to expand its sphere of influence, Japan passed a record defense budget earlier this year, while South Korea has also increased its defense spending. Both nations plan a buildup of their missile defense infrastructure and have placed orders for U.S.-built weapons systems, including F-35 jets and new radar equipment.

Meanwhile, New Zealand has unveiled plans to double its defense spending to two percent of GDP. The Philippines, which would likely be a key target of a potential Chinese offensive in the South Pacific, is reportedly finalizing a deal to purchase 16 F-16 fighter jets from the United States. Australia recently boosted its defense spending as well.

“All of this is Trump’s influence,” said a former Japanese government official who spoke anonymously since he still advises Tokyo.

Halfway around the world in Europe, Russia is continuing to threaten the security of the continent. Once again, Trump’s tough approach demanding U.S. allies get serious about national defense is yielding results.

Germany has historically been one of the biggest defense freeloaders, enjoying a significant U.S. military presence as a deterrent against Russia while neglecting its own military – despite having by far the largest economy in Europe.

In January, German leaders initially criticized Trump for demanding more defense spending from NATO member nations, continuing a pattern seen under the Biden administration. But two months later, German lawmakers voted for a significant increase in defense spending. Germany could now spend as much as 3.5 percent of its GDP on its military, although that figure remains well below the five percent Trump requested.

Nonetheless, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has acknowledged that Trump is correct in his assessment that the prior benchmark of spending two percent of GDP is “not nearly enough.”

“To stay safe in the years to come, allies will need to spend considerably more,” Rutte said, suggesting that NATO member countries should spend at least 3.7 percent of GDP on defense. “If you don’t do it, get your Russian-language courses or go to New Zealand,” he added. Currently, the United States spends more than double what the rest of the alliance spends on defense combined.

France has also set “a target of 3 percent to 3.5 percent” after defense spending reached 2.06 percent of the country’s GDP last year. In Canada, both major party candidates for prime minister have pledged to boost defense spending, with incumbent Liberal leader Mark Carney outlining plans to purchase new submarines, fleets of drones, Arctic patrol ships, and heavy-duty icebreakers. Denmark, another NATO member, has reached an agreement to allocate more than three percent of its GDP to defense in 2025 and 2026.

New NATO members Sweden and Finland, who joined the alliance in 2022 and 2023, respectively, have also pledged to ramp up defense spending to above three percent of GDP by 2030. On the other side of the continent, Greece recently increased its defense spending to nearly that level, including a deal to purchase U.S.-made F-35 jets and a new air defense system dubbed “Achilles’ Shield.”

The media is currently spinning these increased defense spending commitments as a defeat of sorts for Trump since few nations have agreed to meet the president’s target of five percent of GDP. But once again, the press is missing the forest for the trees – any increase at all is a victory over the status quo of NATO members relying almost entirely on American taxpayers to subsidize the defense of the free world.

One NATO nation that has walked the walk on investing in national defense is Poland – an investment that has paid dividends as the country finds itself on the doorstep of the Russia-Ukraine war.

Polish leaders welcomed Trump’s five percent challenge to NATO members, with Prime Minister Donald Tusk noting that “only an ally can wish another ally to get stronger… That is not what an opponent of Europe would say.” Tusk also acknowledged that Trump was correct in his assertion that most of Europe has treated the United States unfairly in relying on American taxpayers to fund their national defense. “Many things have been unfair to the United States,” he said.

Poland has long been a leader in defense spending on the continent, with President Andrzej Duda announcing in February that the country plans to spend 4.7 percent of GDP on defense this year. Warsaw has signed arms contracts worth around $20 billion with the United States to buy 250 M1A2 Abrams battle tanks, 32 F-35 jets, 96 Apache helicopters, Javelin missiles, and artillery rocket systems.

Three independent sources familiar with Polish political discourse have also indicated to me that the country intends to implement a “systematic significant increase” in modernization efforts and stockpile essential supplies critical for defense, such as ammunition.

Poland’s neighbors Lithuania and Estonia, along with Romania, Bulgaria, and the Czech Republic, have also pledged increases in defense spending.

Critics have alleged that Trump’s efforts to compel U.S. allies to increase their defense spending have made conflict more likely. But history suggests that Trump is mirroring President Ronald Reagan’s doctrine of “peace through strength,” which helped defeat the Soviet Union and usher in an unprecedented era of global peace.

“We know only too well that war comes not when the forces of freedom are strong but when they are weak. It is then that tyrants are tempted,” Reagan said in his acceptance speech at the 1980 Republican convention.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine, Hamas’s attack on Israel, Houthi assaults on shipping in the Red Sea, and so many other bubbling conflicts during the Biden years proved Reagan’s words prophetic. Now, Trump is promising to again build a more peaceful world by leading America’s allies – willingly or not – to invest in their own security.

Ben Solis is the pen name of an international affairs journalist, historian, and researcher.

We hope you've enjoyed this article. While you're here, we have a small favor to ask...

The AMAC Action Logo

Your voice matters – and so does your support. By donating to AMAC Action, you help build a grassroots force committed to protecting liberty and promoting responsible governance. Support AMAC Action and help build the grassroots force defending liberty.

Donate Now
Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
anna hubert
anna hubert
1 year ago

Strength and readiness is the only language aggressor understands .It’s time Europe learned it.

Denis Bolen
Denis Bolen
1 year ago

What an outstanding commentary! It clearly demonstrates that president Trump is on the right track in his embrace of Reagan’s “peace through strength” strategy. I am busting with pride with what Trump and his team are doing to save America. Can you imagine the horror and nightmare if Kamala had won?

Vietvet6769
Vietvet6769
1 year ago

Well we arming the Alliance, it peace through strength!

Philip Seth Hammersley
Philip Seth Hammersley
1 year ago

We’ve been propping up Europe for far too long. After WE saved them from the Nazis, we allowed them to flood the market with their goods to grow their economies. And then they want US to defend them while we have to pay them tariffs! They give a pittance to defend THEIR neighbor Ukraine and again expect US to pay the freight!

Thinking
Thinking
1 year ago

The EU in Brussels started talking to put a war chest together as large as 800 billion dollar. When Trump held them to 5% of GDP for NATO from each member country. The only thing was the money did not come from the GDP but the savings of the Europeans in each respective country, they would pay for that. The EU in Brussels is an institution with a flag. They are not elected officials. Ursula Von der Leyen is president and rules with an iron fist. EU is not a country just a bunch of delegates from each country in the Union. But each country still has their own government. For years the EU in Brussels along with NATO relied on America to provide the arms and our soldiers to protect Europe. Ukraine was attacked and who spent the most, America. And the Ukraine is not even a NATO member. But Boris Johnson of Britain and the deep state in America told Biden, Zelensky must not sign the Minsk accord. Because Putin would overrun the rest of Europe. Well with all their dilly dallying, Putin is now so far, he is talking to overrun Europe now. Their is not enough military presence in most European countries. They have no equipment not even bullets. They have no bases ready to house the soldiers after they increase their military. Germany has nothing. They always thought America was going to defend them from any invaders. Trump saw this, and called them on it. Of course Biden jumped right on board to fund NATO. While the tariffs were making America poor and Europe rich. If Biden had been in his right mind maybe he could have made a deal to lower the tariffs on American products. America is not the care taker of every country in the world. We helped Europe to become prosperous after WWII but not at the cost of America going broke. The dems don’t see it. Because they think America is rich enough just tax the billionaires more. That does not bring enough money into the coffers. Which is okay with them. They like it that America is going broke. They want to stop all benefits like Soc Sec, Medicare and Medicaid. Veterans benefits, cut defense spending. Only send small business loans to 9 month old babies and unemployment to people who haven’t been born yet. A hell of a way to get money from the govt. Only the dems don’t like it that these funds go to people who are legally entitled to them. No, send the money to fake people. That way it can be diverted back to those who set it up in the first place. Why are they otherwise so against Trump finding waste, fraud and abuse. Which upsets them to the max. Nobody is taking money away from anyone. Only those that are abusing, committing fraud and waste the money, to those that are not eligible.

Franklin Werkheiser
Franklin Werkheiser
1 year ago

Once again President Trump has taken the Presidency to great accomplishments home, and abroad so can anyone explain to me why Rhinos in our own party led by Cheney and Romney continue to fight against everything positive this man has accomplished and continues to accomplish and continues to side with the liberal far left democrats?

Old Scribe
Old Scribe
1 year ago

When you want peace, prepare for war. Our “allies” have realized that “Uncle Sugar” won’t be guarding them, so they better pull up their socks and defend themselves. Choosing to ignore global threats while merrily embracing Socialism is a recipe for disaster.

Stephen Russell
Stephen Russell
1 year ago

Bravo Hooray

Carls
Carls
1 year ago

Maybe we should make him King. He’s better than the court jester we had for the past four years.

PapaYEC
PapaYEC
1 year ago

Democrats are only interested in their own personal gain to feed their hedonism. Everything always gets worse when Democrats are allowed to steal power.

Paul
Paul
1 year ago

I am glad the Europeon Countries have finally decided to defend themselves.
They are our allies,but they need to be proactive with there own border Security.
Same goes for the Pacific Rim Allies.
Japan and the surrounding area are close to China.
China is now the aggressor.
China wants Taiwan and wouldn’t hesitate to take the Phillipines and Thailand in the process!
The Trump effect is showing the world,to take the initiative and protect yourself.
PEACE IS NEVER CHEAP!

Bill
Bill
1 year ago

In 1994 in Hungary the US, GB and Russia signed an agreement stating if the Ukraine surrendered its nuclear weapons they would be guarantee neutrality.
what happened to this guarantee? Why doesn’t Trump support what we promised the Ukrainian people?
Any one know why we haven’t keep our part of the agreement? The Ukrainians did and look what it has cost them.

Brenda G
Brenda G
1 year ago

Our world seems to be readying itself for inevitable military action coming in the near or close future. I didn’t really want to say it “out loud”- even though it’s there.

John Shipway
John Shipway
1 year ago

Am I the only one that voted for Trump because of his promises to cut defense spending so as to better we, the people of the United States? Yet here we are listening to the man crow about providing ever more “defense welfare” for allies so close to us they have removed almost all semblance of Democracy in their nations.
Who are we defending against? The Houthis who have and will again cease all actions when the baby killers that rule Israel cease their baby killing? Against Russia whom we provoked by initiating a coup against a bordering state which was followed by that lovely “ally” of ours, with a “Nazi Problem”, attacking it’s own people because of their Russian ethnicity?
When did we become the bad guy and why?

California Governor Gavin Newsom (C) speaks as Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (L) listens at a press conference near the closed I-10 elevated freeway following a large pallet fire, which occurred Saturday at a storage yard beneath the freeway, on November 13, 2023 in Los Angeles, California.
ShotSpotter Gunshot Detection
US treasury department

Subscribe to AMAC Daily News and Games

18
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x