The Marxist Roots of ‘Medicare for All’

Medicare for all progressive presidential electionWhen Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) announced the launch of H.R.1384, “Medicare for All,” on the Capitol steps on Feb. 27, 2019, it was a major step toward a socialist America.

Jayapal was surrounded by more than 100 supporters, many from groups such as National Nurses United, the Center for Popular Democracy, Our Revolution, Coalition of Labor Union Women, and the Labor Campaign for Single Payer.

Appropriately, all of the organizations represented are controlled, or at least heavily influenced, by America’s largest Marxist organization, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), which can quite rightly claim credit for the socialist single-payer movement euphemistically referred to as “Medicare for All,” now reaching a peak across the United States.

For decades, even most Democratic representatives shied away from any mention of government-run health care. But now, more than 100 Democratic congressmembers have signed on to a bill that would eventually eliminate the private health insurance industry and give the federal government near total control over every American citizen’s health care.

What happened to cause such a massive shift?

Quentin Young

All this has been a long time in the making. The roots of H.R.1384 can be traced back to the 1930s in South Side, Chicago, when a young Hyde Park High School student named Quentin Young first joined the Young Communist League.

After World War II, Young graduated from Northwestern Medical School and did his residency at Cook County Hospital in Chicago. Young joined the American Medical Association and served as chairman of the Department of Internal Medicine at Cook County, where he helped establish the Department of Occupational Medicine. Later, Young became a clinical professor of Preventive Medicine and Community Health at the University of Illinois Medical Center and senior attending physician at Michael Reese Hospital.

In 1997, he was inducted as a master of the American College of Physicians, and in 1998, he served as president of the American Public Health Association.

Parallel to his stellar medical career, Young also was a prominent hard-left activist. He was close to the Communist Party for decades, and, in 1968, pleaded the Fifth Amendment and refused to testify when the House Un-American Activities Committee accused him of membership in the Bethune Club—a Communist Party group for medical practitioners at Cook County Hospital.

In 1968, while likely still a Communist Party member, Young founded the Medical Committee for Human Rights, one of the first American socialized-medicine advocacy groups in the modern era.

In the late 1970s, Young was affiliated with the New American Movement (NAM), an alliance of former student radicals and ex-communists. In 1982, NAM joined the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee to form the DSA, which would remain Young’s ideological home until his death in March 2016. In 1987, Young co-founded Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), which now has more than 21,000 members and chapters across the United States.

Under Young’s guidance, the DSA became the major driving force behind the campaign for socialized medicine in the United States.

According to PNHP’s website:

“Our members and physician activists work toward a single-payer national health program in their communities. PNHP performs ground breaking research on the health crisis and the need for fundamental reform, coordinates speakers and forums, participates in town hall meetings and debates, contributes scholarly articles to peer-reviewed medical journals, and appears regularly on national television and news programs advocating for a single-payer system.

“PNHP is the only national physician organization in the United States dedicated exclusively to implementing a single-payer national health program.”

Los Angeles physician Steve Tarzynski, then a member of the DSA National Political Committee and chair of the DSA National Health Care Task Force, wrote in the January/February 1994 edition of the DSA magazine Democratic Left:

“We’ve met some of the modest goals that the national leadership set when DSA decided to make support for a single-payer Canadian-style health care system our major issue.

“DSA members have served on the Clinton Health Care Task Force and in the leadership and rank and file of national and state single-payer coalitions. Perhaps most importantly, in 1991, we organized a 22-city national tour of over forty Canadian health experts (from our sibling party, the New Democrats) that helped to galvanize the single-payer movement into action. No other organization was in a position to carry out such a major tour. We have done a good job as the socialist current within the single-payer movement, but still have significant opportunities to improve DSA locals’ level of activism and our recruitment of activists into DSA through this issue.

“The most delicate aspect of our work is how we balance our efforts in improving the Clinton proposal and pushing for single-payer. This is not a new dilemma for the left. The tension between reform and revolution has existed within every socialist movement in Western industrialized democracies. It will always be with us. The solution lies in putting into practice Michael Harrington’s notion of ‘visionary gradualism.’”

Hillary Clinton’s health reforms eventually failed, but the DSA refused to give up. The comrades pushed more initiatives through allies in Congress, such as Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).

According to the summer 2009 edition of Democratic Left:

“DSA reaffirms its support for single-payer health insurance as the most just, cost-effective and rational method for creating a universal health care system in the United States.

“In the House of Representatives, John Conyers has introduced H.R.676, the Expanded and Improved Medicare for All Act. This bill has 77 co-sponsors. In the Senate, Bernie Sanders has introduced S.703, the American Health Security Act of 2009. His bill has not yet attracted co-sponsors.

“These two pieces of legislation take different approaches to universal health insurance, but both take for-profit insurance companies out of the picture.

“DSA asks our locals to contact their senators and representatives and encourage them to co-sponsor these bills if they have not already done so.”

Meanwhile, Young was using personal relationships to further the cause.

Young was a long-time friend and political mentor to former President Barack Obama, a fact confirmed in a March 2009 interview with Democracy Now!’s Amy Goodman:

Amy Goodman: “You’ve been a longtime friend of Barack Obama.”

Quentin Young: “Yeah.”

Ms. Goodman: “How has he changed over the years?”

Mr. Young: “Well, Barack Obama, as we know, was a community organizer, a very lofty calling, in my book, and he made the decision, when the opportunity came, that he could get more done politically, and he accepted the nomination for the seat in the state Senate. It’s not that long ago, really. It’s about six, eight years ago.

“Barack Obama, in those early days—influenced, I hope, by me and others—categorically said single payer was the best way, and he would inaugurate it if he could get the support, meaning majorities in both houses, which he’s got, and the presidency, which he’s got. And he said that on more than one occasion, and it represented the very high-grade intelligence we all know Barack has.”

Obama’s Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) was not single-payer. It was an incremental, halfway measure that satisfied few on the left and drove health insurance costs through the roof.

Inevitable Conclusion

Gerald Friedman is a Massachusetts labor economist and DSA member. Writing in Democratic Left in October 2013, Friedman explained that when Obamacare inevitably failed, fully socialized health care would be the next option:

“After a century of struggle, the ACA [Affordable Care Act] commits the United States to providing universal access to health care. This is a great achievement, one to be treasured and nurtured.

“Now the real fight begins, to turn this commitment into a reality that the ACA itself cannot produce. Barack Obama was right the first time: only a single-payer program can provide universal coverage, and only a single-payer program can control costs. The ACA may be the last bad idea that Americans try; after it fails, we will finally do the right thing: single-payer health insurance.”

That’s where the United States is now. The DSA and its friends in Congress have so butchered the finest health system in the world, so driven affordable care beyond the reach of millions of Americans, that government-run health care now looks like a viable option to many.

If the United States doesn’t change course toward a more humane, affordable, and innovative free-market health system, it may soon be too late.

More than 350 million Americans are on the brink of losing their high-quality health care and their liberty to a plan hatched by a handful of Chicago Marxists.

Such a massive fraud against the American people can’t be allowed to succeed.

Reprinted with permission from - The Epoch Times - by Trevor Loudon

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
2 years ago

If “Medicare for All” is Marxist then current Medicare is too. True?

3 years ago

If government controlled health care government would also control our health and reward or punish with good or bad health according to loyalties extended the governing bodies. To some degree I think Solzhenitsyn may have been hinting at this with Cancer Ward.. copping out on coming to The States because of his apparent belief that Communism COULD be fundamentally good if there were only more people like himself..

2 years ago
Reply to  Peter

Like the UK & Canada?

3 years ago

You should know that Quentin Young has moved to the netherworld in order to better serve his Satanic Overlord.

3 years ago
Reply to  RAND E. GERALD

No doubt. Collectivism encourages blasphemy of the Holy Spirit which according to Scripture is the only Sin which cannot be forgiven. This gets the comrades to agree to anything since their consciences can be easily black mailed by leadership haunting them with that supposition. As we know early Communists like Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin all used pseudonyms wherein accountability is of course laughable to those individuals. Their names become shock absorbent warding off any criticism and fending off any bi-lateral discussion.. true “kings of their castles”.. but also essentially never having any real connection to The People.. Hence the “perfect crime” # 1 no witnesses, because # 2 names are changed to protect the “innocent” (crimes committed in the name of “class warfare”).,.

3 years ago

You should know that Quentin Young has moved to the netherworld in service to his Satanic Overlord.

Jack Worthington
3 years ago
Reply to  RAND E. GERALD

@Rand E. Gerald, Quentin Young was Satan’s acolyte. The Bible teaches that we are just returned to the Earth until the resurrections come along and then some are approved and enjoy the paradise on Earth and others who reject God are simply returned to the ground. God loves us and would not subject anyone to permanent torture. I know this goes against the with which I was indoctrinated by the MSM et.al. but the Bible simply does not support a permanent chamber of pain.

You might take a peek at Statism. Statists believe that…
1. Bad means are often needed to achieve good ends (the ends justify the means)
2. The State should initiate force to achieve social goals (aggression/violence is acceptable, i.e. they are immoral, typically this describes politicians, especially commie/socialists and particularly DemonKraits but not limited to them)
3. People who work for The State can morally do things that would be criminal for others to do (true for many bureaucrats but not all)

Thomas Sowell said: “The most basic question is not what is best, but who shall decide what is best.”

Randy P.
3 years ago

Call a spade a spade. The Medicare For All Freedom For None Act.

2 years ago
Reply to  Randy P.

So we get rid of current Medicare?

3 years ago

We’re fighting it off for now, but what happens years down the line when the leftists take over again? I expect to live as least another 20 years, but as a senior citizen I worry about the future. I don’t doubt that progressive socialist death panels will be making my decision for me before my time.

2 years ago
Reply to  Ezzie

“socialist death squads” like in Canada & the UK?

Jeffrey Inmon
3 years ago

government run healthcare. You can’t have more waste and inefficiency than that

Tommy Molnar
3 years ago
Reply to  Jeffrey Inmon

What could possibly go wrong???

2 years ago
Reply to  Jeffrey Inmon

Then let’s get rid of Medicare.

3 years ago

“Medicare for all” is a fraud. Even it’s name is dishonest. It is not Medicare which beneficiaries pay into during their working lives. It would in fact end the real Medicare along with the private insurance coverage that most Americans receive as part of their employment compensation packages. Like all Leftist schemes, eg. Green New Deal, it uses an issue as a means to an end, ie. political power and control.

3 years ago
Reply to  Marc

I so agree. It is all fraud and will not pay for anything or anyone over 60 yrs old or Pre existing. The physicians that will enroll in it will be only mediocre ones and will refer you because a specialized physician will not be available. You will wait many months to see a physician if at all. Many 3rd world countries and Europe have opted out of for all medical. Why do people from other countries come here to save their lives of family. Why because their country will not cover it or they will die by the time their number comes up to be seen by a physician.

3 years ago
Reply to  Marc

Think about the two tier healthcare system in Cuba.

2 years ago
Reply to  Marc

You mean political control like Jim Crow?

Lawrence Greenberg
3 years ago

People need to understand something before signing on to the idea of government-controlled health care. This “one payer” plan has nothing to do with ensuring that all Americans are covered by health insurance. The Left could not care less about anyone or anything other than control, and that is exactly what this is. If the government ever manages to gain complete control over everyone’s health care, it would mean that unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats, more likely than not with no medical knowledge, would be given control over every person’s health care. And this is what the Left wants because the bottom line is that when the government controls your health care, they can deny coverage at any time and for any reason. So, if you are ideologically opposed to whomever is in power at a given moment (and the Left expects it to be them), if you protest against the government, if you say the “wrong” things or associate with the “wrong” people, you will simply be cut off from health care and hung out to die. That is the goal: to control everyone by controlling access to health care.

3 years ago

Amen. The only “universal health” care” comes from GOD the almighty. Medicine is worldly and expensive. Prayer is free to all.

Jack Thomas
3 years ago
Reply to  Doris

True, but God uses the considerable skills and knowledge of doctors for good. Medicine may be “worldly and expensive” as you put it, but people need doctors when they’re sick or injured. That’s “reality.” What’s NOT reality is the notion that the Gov’t. can provide less costly and more equitable “universal healthcare.” Doctors should never be the puppets of a socialized healthcare system, nor should American citizens become its victims. If our elected leaders used more of the gray matter that God put between their ears (e.g. “brain”) and wanted to really fix healthcare, they need only to rein in the abuses within the insurance industry instead of trying to destroy it. Do that and the free market will take care of the rest.

3 years ago

Accurately said

Lawrence Greenberg
3 years ago
Reply to  Evar

Thank you.

2 years ago

With Medicare for All “you will simply be cut off from health care and hung out to die” like those on Medicare in the US & everybody in the UK & Canada?

3 years ago

it doest matter where women come from moslim asian martian

they ate the apple like eve. the snake. reconciliation. six six six. read the good book.

Leonard Mandel LTC USA(R)
3 years ago
Reply to  Bartholemew

What’s your point?
Don’t get it.
Colonel Lenny

3 years ago

Wow! … Medicare For All!!! … I’m All For It Now That It Also Includes ALL Our Congressional Representatives AND ALL Government Agencies and Their Employees!!!

What? … It’s Not “All For One AND One For All! … and I Thought Socialism Treated Everyone Equally!!! … Phonies, ALL Of Them!!!

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x