Government Watch / Opinion / Politics

The Campus Diversity Scam

Democratic politicians and their media toadies are warning that the Supreme Court is poised to rule against the use of racial preferences in college admissions, putting diversity on college campuses at risk. Don’t buy their alarmist rhetoric. Campus diversity is a scam.

On Oct. 31, the Court will hear oral argument in Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College. That case will show that Harvard and other colleges that discriminate against white and Asian American applicants in favor of less qualified Black and Hispanic applicants — under the pretext of promoting student body diversity — offer Black and Hispanic students segregated college life. They have separate dorms, separate student activities and dining halls, courses of study geared to their own ethnicity and even segregated graduation ceremonies.

Black students who benefit from relaxed admissions standards are virtually guaranteed their contact with students of other races at college will be minimal. There’s Harvard and Black Harvard. The same is true at Yale, which provides an entirely parallel campus life for Black students, according to information submitted to the Court.

The harm suffered by highly qualified applicants who are denied admission is the worst because they lack that single all-important feature: darker skin. Affirmative action is not a victimless crime.

The Court will hear about the cruelty and dishonesty of Harvard’s admissions process, which is rigged against high-performing Asian American students under the guise of promoting “diversity.” What Harvard does to these young kids is “appalling,” according to Students for Fair Admissions.

Harvard concocted a scheme to downgrade high-performing Asian American applicants by measuring what it vaguely calls “personality.” Even when Harvard alumni interview Asian American candidates in person and give them glowing reviews, the admissions office overrides those reviews and substitutes a low personality grade — low enough to knock many candidates out of the running.

They’re rated as dull, uninteresting — ugly, negative stereotypes.

Many other universities now mimic Harvard’s system of demoting Asian American applicants. The Princeton Review cautions college applicants not to include a picture if they look Asian, and to avoid discussing their immigrant heritage. If this were happening to a more favored minority, the nation would be in a moral uproar.

The discrimination young Asian Americans face fills them with “despair” and feelings of “racial inferiority,” according to statements submitted to the court. In high school, many “undertake overwhelming study loads, literally working themselves into ill health” to compensate for the tougher odds of getting into college. “They suffer high rates of anxiety and depression” and are “1.6 times more likely than others to make a serious suicide attempt.”

If this were happening to Black high school students, there would be calls for congressional hearings and marches.

Meanwhile, the Left is slamming the Court, warning that it is about to overturn precedent. In 2003, the Court ruled in Grutter v. Bollinger that the University of Michigan could consider race in undergraduate admissions to secure “the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body.”

Now it’s obvious that the higher education establishment’s declared commitment to diversity is a ruse. As two members of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Gail Heriot and Peter N. Kirsanow, explain to the Court, “if the purpose of racial preferences is to create an environment where students are exposed to classmates of different races and backgrounds, establishing separate racial enclaves is a strange way to go about it.”

Yet 15 Democratic senators and 65 House Democrats signed statements urging the justices to protect racial preferences because “diverse campuses” provide “all students with a quality, well-rounded education,” wrote House Education and Labor Committee Chair Bobby Scott.

If they actually believed that, Democrats in Congress would recommend denying federal funds to colleges and universities that segregate students. These pols are merely kowtowing to Black voters, the only voters, according to a recent poll, who still support racial preferences.

Most Americans want all college applicants, regardless of skin color, to be treated fairly. The late Justice Antonin Scalia explained how it should be: “In the eyes of government, we are just one race here. It is American.”

That should be the rule at Harvard and everywhere in this land.

Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York and chairman of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths. Follow her on Twitter @Betsy_McCaughey. To find out more about Betsy McCaughey and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website.


If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
4 months ago

All of the diversity rules are so confusing… I can’t keep up with the oppressed vs more oppressed vs oppressors… can somebody on the Left please put together some sort of rank and rating type list? Like I assume a white Christian heterosexual rich Conservative is at the bottom and a black poor atheist trans woman that identifies as a man is one of the most oppressed? But there is just so many other levels… Asians are apparently now privileged over Hispanics and Blacks? Where are Muslims in all of this? Title IX, feminism and Woman’s Right used to be important.
And this gets even more emotional with those extreme MAGA Republicans looking to destroy our Democracy with lies…
You know; Conservatives: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–“

james carlyle
5 months ago

What a mess. If one wants to attend an institution in order to gain objective knowledge–what criterion must he use? I studied engineering -diversity, gender, race, ethnicity, heritage, skin color, equity and equality were not a factor in my education nor the pursuit of my profession..

anna hubert
5 months ago

Campus diversity? How about student ability That should be the only requiernement

james carlyle
5 months ago
Reply to  anna hubert

D’accord Anna

Nick Murphy
5 months ago

For those of you that have been around the block as many times as I have, this is a rehash. This was done years ago it ended up being called reverse discrimination. New York had a lack of people of color being hired is firemen and EMTs, so obviously it was a problem of the white people. They lowered the standards to attract more. Would you use that criteria to hire a doctor or a surgeon? The standards are where they are for a reason. Is the minimum abilities required to successfully do the job. The job stayed the same the people applying we’re not good enough to achieve the standards. Where does this quit? I wanted to be a surgeon and ended up being a truck driver you need to drop the standards so I can be a surgeon too. Would you let me operate on you? This Society is beyond help.

5 months ago

I agree with Justice Scalia……we are only one race & that is American. All applicants should be treated equally based on their qualifications.

5 months ago

Martin Luther King Jr. is rolling in his grave over these Democrats! If he were alive today, I’ll bet he’d be a Republican!

5 months ago
Reply to  Carol

I believe he was a Republican

4 months ago
Reply to  Mike

Probably a Democrat since April 5th 1968…

Bob K
5 months ago

It’s way overdue to put an end to racial preference in both college admission and workforce hiring.

5 months ago

The DemocRat government is trying to intercede in issues about which it should avoid. But, of course, we know that RULE of learning institutions, among other institutions and organizations, is a primary goal of the DemocRat Party even though there is no Constitutional support of such a policy.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x