Newsline

National Security , Newsline

Impeachment – Disgraceful “Show Trial”

Posted on Thursday, February 4, 2021
|
by AMAC, Robert B. Charles
|
7 Comments
|
Print

unconstitutionalHow sad, disheartening, disgraceful. On the global stage, in a time when due process, civil liberties, free speech, and rule of law are challenged around the world, from China, Russia, and Iran – which just executed a second Olympic wrestler for speech – we are about to have a Chinese-style “show trial.” See, e.g., https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-36983521; https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/china-s-show-trial-of-the-century-by-ma-jian; https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9134367/Iran-set-execute-second-wrestler-year-hanging-champion-competitor.

Incredibly, the US Senate is about to “try” a former president (almost universally considered unconstitutional), impeached by a partisan House in three days without due process, witnesses, defense, or chance to confront accusers, on a standard that compels dismissal in court (no legal incitement, under Brandenburg), and now without a Chief Justice (who considers the mockery beneath him), and without time to mount a legal defense – to showcase what?

Venality, personal antipathy, political one-ups-woman-ship?  The whole thing is devolving into “theater of the absurd,” a childish rant taken to unconstitutional extremes, laid at the feet of an appalled America public by Speaker Nancy Pelosi and a churlish, vain glorious, conservative-hating Democrat House, enabled by a weak, egotistical, out-of-touch Senate Majority Leader, Chuck Schumer.

Legally, if not politically, this is an unforced error, staged train wreck, showing all the world how partisan, unprofessional, intellectually dishonest, and constitutionally unfaithful America’s leading Democrats can be. Criminals at the Capitol should be arrested, but the former president is guilty of no crime. Where is Joe Biden to say, “children grow up”? Where are level Democrat heads, working to enlighten their caucus – to say, this is useless, dead end, sure to backfire, given how many Americans not supported Trump, and how many more want to the past left behind?

They are nowhere to be found. Accordingly, we will witness the first “show trial” of a US president –former president – in American history, first grand senatorial mockery of justice since McCarthyism.

The notion that due process – an important guarantee for all Americans – is being ignored, will make China’s Politburo chortle to no end, happy to keep crushing rights, since America’s Congress is all talk. If America’s Democrats do not respect rights, why should China? Or Putin, who just arrested 5,000 protestors, who dared protest corruption – as Americans used to without fear.

The irony is so profound, average Americans are startled, embarrassed, as much as disinterested, disaffected, and disgusted. We expect Senators to be grown-ups, not schoolyard bullies or bumbling fools. Yet here we are, watching something that amounts to an historic spectacle.

What is the spectacle? We are watching the Constitution savaged, starting with the First Amendment. In relevant part, it restricts Congress from “abridging freedom of speech… or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

That is what the president encouraged people to do, and what 99 percent who heard did. An indisputably liberal Supreme Court in 1969 – led by Earl Warren, joined by Thurgood Marshall and William Brennan, avowed political liberals – held in Brandenburg v. Ohio under similar circumstances, that actionable “incitement” required specific intent to “lawless” behavior and “likelihood” the specific intent would create lawlessness. See, e.g., https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brandenburg_test.

By reference to dozens of decided federal cases, nothing in the president’s remarks met either prong. That is one reason the Chief Justice likely demurred. He does not want to be dragged into an anti-constitutional “show trial.”

A second constitutional bar to this mess is the Framers’ intent.  Impeachment was never intended to try a president after office, since the remedy is removal. Any American, no law degree required, can read this.  So can Senators, who choose to press on.

Third, the Constitution is clear about federal actions not violating the 5th Amendment guarantee of due process – the one put there by Framers, not added later for States by the 14th Amendment.

The text is clear, that actions portending to justice – presumably by courts, House, or Senate, must abide due process.  If they do not, they violate the 5th Amendment.  Self-evidently, the House threw due process out the window – faster than in the first trial.  The Senate has done the same.  Violating due process in this context is an abomination, a disgrace.

Then comes the Sixth Amendment violation, where Congress ignores guarantees – implicitly as much for impeachment as civil or criminal trials – allowing an accused to mount a defense, confront accusers, and enjoy fairness in preparation for trial.  All gone.

Gone too is the guarantee that an “accused shall enjoy… trial … by an impartial jury.”  Put enjoyment aside, as Trump might just enjoy all this.  Focus on that “impartial jury.” Has Schumer or any Democrat sounded impartial?  Also missing is the guarantee that witnesses against him be confronted, “compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor” (that is, subpoena power) given, and time allowed for “assistance of counsel.”  Poof, all gone.

One could argue that the hoped-for punishment – although conviction is not likely – is also “cruel and unusual punishment,” a violation of the Eighth Amendment, stripping an innocent man of an office he no longer holds and forbidding him from running again. That would be a stretch, but this whole charade is a stretch – to breaking the Constitution.

Last, consider the mockery of “show trial” – not unlike China – becoming normal.  If a president can be impeached after office, what president is free of that penalty now?  None.  If a president is impeachable for exercising constitutionally protected speech, what American is not in fear?

If one part of the Constitution can be disrespected, distorted, and misused for naked political gain, what part is safe from such politically motivated misuse? What American is safe to speak, worship, assemble, petition, defend herself, avoid unfair persecution, detention, and an unfair show trial?  The answer, by reference to Congressional Democrats – no one is safe.

So, I leave you with this. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights depend on honor, honesty, educated and truthful interpretation – not knife-in-back gamesmanship, self-inflating demagoguery, or dishonest action by Congressional partisans.

If smart, Democrats would pull the plug on this, dismiss the effort to embarrass a former President, and get on with business.  That is what grown-ups would do.  But we live in strange times. We are about to witness an anti-constitutional “show trial” of a former president. The Framers would not be happy.  Democrats do not seem to see the folly. On they plow into the mud-rich embankment of constitutional savagery.  How sad, disheartening, disgraceful.

Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Minion23
Minion23
3 years ago

Perhaps our new Comrade-In-Chief would consider adding a procedure that would in one fell swoop add to the Federal Treasury AND punish those that indirectly aided the sedition with President Trump. He could fine every one of the 74,222,593 voters who voted for President Trump $1,400 (that he can deduct from their stimulus payment) and add $103,911,630,200 to the federal coffers. And those fined who do not willingly pay the fine, get indicted along with his impeachment.

matt
matt
3 years ago

This is a ridiculous endeavor by the leftist democrats who obviously are using this sham to try to prevent President Trump from running again. Doesn’t look to be Constitutional or legal but that will not stop Nancy and her conspirators from wasting millions of our tax dollars again. What is really sad is the crew of republican law makers who are voicing approval of this travesty. Perhaps they want to suck up to the democrats but one thing is sure ; the millions of voters who support Trump will not re- elect these low life traitors

Diane
Diane
3 years ago

We.can make a dent in the pockets of tech companies, we all know who they are and what they’re doing. Stop buying their electronics and at the very least cut back on purchases. Remove yourselves from social media sites, they depend on our participation. Put your money in your packet. There are other ways to communicate.

Bets
Bets
3 years ago

The most disheartening of it all is that all we have are opinions being slung around and keyboard warriors fighting the cause TALK TALK TALK …. I’m sad to see a great country fall

matt
matt
3 years ago

Well, Trump was not convicted. What a surprise, Seeing as he did not order an assault on the Capitol. I guess the democrats are sad. Their ploy did not work. All politicians will now have to be on notice that they can’t have any political rallies unless they personally control each one of the attendees !! If some wildcard does something wrong the politician is guilty of insurrection. Oh wait, sorry, this does not apply to democrats. They can encourage looting and riots but that is ok. The six ” republicans” who voted to impeach should switch parties. They are obviously looking for some favors from the democrats. It is unlikely they will be re elected by the Republican voters. Congrats to President Trump. He did nothing wrong and has rightfully been acquitted.

Defund The Police Sign in Toronto, Ontario. A sign calling to defund the police is attached to a tree during a `Not Another Black Life` protest in Toronto, Ontario, on June 19, 2020.
Christmas tree decorated luminous gold,red ,Rome Italy March 08 creation of Adam by Michelangelo night,symbol Religion
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) speaks at a news conference about the findings of a recent Government Accountability Office (GAO) report pertaining to disciplinary treatment of young black and brown girls in schools across the United States at the U.S. Capitol on September 19, 2024 in Washington, DC. House Democrats held the news conference to discuss different anecdotes of the report including the different circumstances faced by young black and brown girls compared to their white peers in schools and how at times they face exacerbated punishment due to their appearance. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Stay informed! Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter.

"*" indicates required fields

7
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Subscribe to AMAC Daily News and Games