Ever since it was created in 1967 as part of Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society, Republicans have spoken of cutting off federal funding for the Corporation of Public Broadcasting. In 1969, Richard Nixon proposed slashing its budget, but the effort was thwarted with the help of an emotional plea from Fred Rogers at a Senate committee hearing. In the decades since, conservatives have lamented the growing bias at NPR and PBS, whose content local stations purchase with taxpayer grants through the corporation. But for all this time, Republicans have proven unwilling to withstand overwrought attacks about wanting to kill Big Bird. That is, until now.
It is easy to look at the passage of a recissions bill totaling $9 billion of spending cuts and complain that it won’t make a dent in the debt, which is approaching $37 trillion. But such complaints should not prevent us from appreciating what it means for Republicans, under the leadership of President Trump, to finally follow through on cutting off federal funding for these broadcasters.
When LBJ signed the law that created public broadcasting, he stated that its lofty goal was to “enrich man’s spirit” by providing support for quality educational and cultural content. Such endeavors are well beyond any sensible notion of the role of the federal government, even if the CPB had lived up to these ambitions and proven free from bias. But it has not.
PBS and NPR have consistently peddled content that advanced a progressive worldview, reporting on news and history with bias, and attempting to brainwash children with woke propaganda (for instance, PBS Kids content advises parents to talk to their kids about “white privilege”).
The defenses that have been offered by PBS are absurd. PBS CEO Paula Kerger claimed that without the broadcaster, farmers would have trouble getting weather reports for their crops. Others have cited the fact that our founder, William F. Buckley, had a show on PBS for decades, but that ended in 1999.
The current CEO of NPR, Katherine Maher, still insists that the organization is “non-partisan” despite former producer Uri Berliner’s finding that when he worked there, he looked up the voter registration of employees in the D.C. office, and Democrats outnumbered Republicans by 87 to zero. There’s also its history of double standards, such as covering the Russian collusion story relentlessly while proudly refusing to cover the Hunter Biden laptop story.
But focusing on partisan bias is a bit of a diversion, because the primary bias is ideological. Maher herself should understand the distinction. Before joining NPR, she once blasted then–Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton not from the center, but for “erasing the language of non-binary people” by using the terms “boy” and “girl.”
The public radio broadcaster used to have staff read the Declaration of Independence on air every July 4th. In 2022, they broke that tradition in favor of having a discussion about equality, and then went back and added trigger warnings to its archived past readings, saying the nation’s founding document “contains offensive language about Native Americans.”
As we argued last year when calling for the defunding of NPR, these broadcasters have every right to operate as left-wing propaganda outlets, but they are not entitled to pursue this goal with taxpayer money. Cutting off their federal funding is long overdue, and we hope, enduring.
The Editors comprise the senior editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.
Reprinted with permission from National Review by The Editors.
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of AMAC or AMAC Action.

When you talk about left wing marxist, publications, be sure to add AARP.
If they had skipped the communist propaganda all these years and stuck to Masterpiece Theatre, they wouldn’t be facing Death in Paradise now.
About time! Democrats have almost total control of the media.
Not a single republican on NPR’s staff and they’re unbiased???? Well, thanks to President Trump, they can spew all of their liberal diarrhea they want, but not on my taxpayer dollars!!! MAGA!!!!
Nobody needs WOKE broadcasting and believe or not, farmers are not backwoods idiots. Anybody can get a local or national weather report. Good riddance. Not needed.
Stopping tax-payer funding for PBS should have nothing to do with the bias nature of the programming. Tax-payer funding must stop because TAXPAYERS SHOULD NOT BE FUNDING TV PROGRAMMING OF ANY KIND, even for fair/balanced programming. PBS can fund itself like ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, etc…do, put out programs people want to see that attracts advertisers and then fund through advertising revenue.
CEO of NPR, Katherine Maher, is not only corrupt, she is a habitual LIAR, and makes Pinocchio look like a TRUTH-TELLING SAINT.
I have long enjoyed programing originating on PBS television. Currently not all programs are available for free. I have not heard this mentioned, but it is the reason that I, a retired 71 year old, do not have access to the programs I like the most. PBS Passport is not on my budget. Do you think all the families in the rural areas and inner city have the funds either? PBS has funding from other sources. Bird Bird is part of a franchise that makes enough money on it’s own. I rarely listened to NPR because of their blatant biases. I do not mind the BBB has taken off their “training wheels”.
Propaganda by any other name is still propaganda
I haven’t watched the news on PBS for years, they are so heavily biased to the left. Also most of their , so called documentaries are left wing biased. They do have some good music shows and programs that aren’t political.
In this time and age, the government has no business using our tax dollars for federal funding for the Corporation of Public Broadcasting. This should all be private funding, period!
I wholeheartedly rejoice with this halting, hopefully forever, of taxpayer money for PBS & NPR. I have tried many times over the years to listen to or watch programming from these sources and turned it off in disgust of biased and far left material. Yay for this courageous decision!
About time. NPR (we call it national palestinian radio) has been biased from the outset but has been getting worse and worse over time. So glad to see Trump doing what he said he would.
Excellent points. From the dollars & cents perspective, rarely if ever is any given NPR / PBS local affiliate or national DC locations salaries brought up and only as a portion of “operating costs” during fundraisers. The individual on-air personality salary / benefit pkg. should be discussed in specific numbers. If this ever is it’s sure to be given an evasive, non-specific answer. These aren’t minimum-wage positions and talent isn’t cheap.
In yrs. past these public radio & t.v. stations were termed as “experimental or college
stations”. Now these are million dollar concerns almost a d.b.a.
LBJ again. No surprise there.
The Masterpiece productions, the cooking and the travel shows are all I watch on PBS. The great bulk of the radical liberal information is on the news programs. Seems the last several years, they have their fund-raising weeks on much more often. So I am glad to see our tax money not be spent on NPR/PBS. Let the liberals fund them.
Have it compete then see changes come
Hallelujah!
Ok, great news, should have been done in the first term.
Now, when are you going to stop with the varied distractions and release ALL the Epstein material? What’s the matter? You think maybe a little kiddie poking by you or someone close might not go over well with the base you just called “Stupid” and “Weak”?
You may be right but you should release the data anyway before Judicial Watch’s lawsuit forces it from you.