A whistleblower report last month revealed a shocking reality inside Lockheed Martin, the nation’s largest defense contractor: bonuses awarded based not on merit, but on race.
For every patriotic American, this is more than just illegal. It’s a betrayal of the values that keep our military strong – and the practice likely wouldn’t have even been exposed were it not for Trump’s return to the White House. However, Lockheed now appears committed to reforms.
According to internal documents and testimony, top performers at Lockheed Martin in recent years were denied bonuses solely because they were white. Managers were told to “increase POC [person of color] 4 and decrease non-minority 4,” code for dropping qualified white employees from bonus lists and replacing them with others based on skin color alone.
This wasn’t a one-off mistake. It was deliberate and systematic. As first reported by City Journal, Lockheed’s HR leadership pressured managers to adjust bonus allocations to satisfy race-based “representation goals,” regardless of performance. One senior VP warned managers to “fit in the box,” and a top HR official suggested that failure to meet DEI expectations could bring legal trouble or reputational harm.
In a scathing resignation letter, the whistleblower described what he was required to do as a manager when awarding end-of-year bonuses: “I, at the direction of Lockheed, have actively discriminated against higher performing individuals… we could have 18 valid individual claims with associated public embarrassment and lost customer trust.”
This isn’t just unlawful – it’s a threat to national security. Lockheed Martin is not some ad agency or fashion brand. It builds the most advanced fighter jets, missile systems, and space technologies in the world. Its $71 billion in annual revenue comes overwhelmingly from American taxpayers.
The F-35 fighter jet doesn’t care about DEI. Neither do our adversaries. China, Iran, and Russia aren’t wasting time with woke hiring practices. They are building, testing, and deploying advanced weapons systems with the singular goal of challenging American supremacy. As President Trump has warned, we cannot afford to meet that challenge with a workforce hamstrung by progressive identity politics.
When bonuses are handed out based on racial quotas rather than excellence, the company is sending a clear message that identity politics matters more than performance. When that happens at a company responsible for supplying our warfighters, the consequences go far beyond boardroom politics – it risks battlefield failure.
This is the very ideology President Trump is working to uproot. In his first days back in office, he signed Executive Orders 14151 and 14173, dismantling the DEI bureaucracy within the federal government and mandating a colorblind, merit-based approach across all federal contractors. The White House said Trump’s goal was to protect “the civil rights of all Americans and expand individual opportunity by terminating radical DEI preferencing… and directing federal agencies to relentlessly combat private sector discrimination.”
Nowhere is that mission more important than in defense contracting.
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has also made that clear. “We’re removing DEI content, eliminating quotas, ensuring recruitment, retention, and promotions are based on performance, not immutable characteristics,” he said recently while addressing the Army War College.
Under Hegseth, the Pentagon has already eliminated over $5 billion in woke consulting, DEI training, and ancillary programs. Job postings, training modules, and internal briefings have been scrubbed of race and gender ideology. Instead, the focus has returned to readiness, discipline, and warfighting capability.
That culture shift is now spreading to the defense industry as well. In response to the allegations against the company, Lockheed Martin published a “Statement on Past Compensation Practices.” That statement declared that the company is a “meritocracy” and that it is “committed to recognizing performance, rewarding excellence, and upholding the principles of merit and fairness.”
The company also said it is reviewing the matter, has taken steps to align with President Trump’s executive orders, and will “appropriately compensate any employees who were adversely affected.” Lockheed praised Trump’s leadership and affirmed its partnership with the administration in “defending our nation and deterring our adversaries.”
But as positive as that all may seem, the case raises other disturbing questions. How many other contractors quietly sacrificed merit for DEI metrics? How many engineering teams were assembled to check diversity boxes instead of ensuring mission-critical capability? It’s time to find out. Even if no Americans were directly harmed as a result of Lockheed’s DEI insanity, the public deserves to know what unnecessary risks were taken.
Harmeet Dhillon, the Trump-appointed chief of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, underscored the broader scope of the problem, posting on X: “This is happening in HR departments ALL OVER AMERICA” in response to the Lockheed revelations. The administration is poised to investigate. And now every company in America has been warned.
If Lockheed Martin or others want to continue receiving billions in taxpayer dollars, they must fall in line. End the race-based bonuses. Fire the executives responsible. Publicly recommit to merit and performance. And if they won’t, Congress and the Pentagon must act by cutting funding.
The American people are not paying for social experiments. They’re paying for national security. And under President Trump, the message is clear: merit and excellence are back. Anything less is unacceptable.
W.J. Lee has served in the White House, NASA, on multiple political campaigns, and in nearly all levels of government. In his free time, he enjoys the “three R’s” – reading, running, and writing.

If race was solely the reason for monetary reward, what is the criteria for actual hiring? Nothing creates disgruntled employees and destroys morale than a system that is based on reparations than ability. There is no second best when it comes to defense, it’s time for talent, skills and drive to retake center stage.
Matters involving merit and excellence are ethical and race entering the picture is not ethical. This is an important article — it is appreciated. Well done W.J.Lee !
And yet we now have unqualified DEI in leadership positions. Will take time to weed them out and in the mean time they cause disharmony, bad decisions and turmoil.
Maybe Boeing has been hiring with DEI standards and that is why their planes fall apart in the air!
I am OFFENDED at how both Congress and Lockheed Martin among many other companies displayed and continue to display such disrespect of the taxpayers who work their assess off and struggl financially only to find out the crap that has come out since President Trump got into office. Not to mention the money that is being used to put things right!
A course correction is NOT enough. These employee’s should SUE the pants off this Company.
Apply to all Defense Contractors
I’ve been working on my theory of racial development since the last ice cap melted not me, race development. This explains why CRT and DEI are bad news. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D_rCkkz34vBN-95I3ysMZj_TwcFW5uUCh1w5IcoFdGM/edit?usp=sharing
Maybe Lockheed Martin can blame the abysmal failure of the entire F35 fiasco on rewarding their engineers based solely on check boxes marked off on performance forms.
That plane might be the worst aircraft ever produced. MAYBE 30+ years ago it had some stealth capabilities but it never mattered as they still tend to fall out of the sky randomly. WE attempted to provide India with one and first rattle out of the box it couldn’t fire up so as to move it to a hanger. Last I heard its serving as an attraction for Indian citizens displaying the laughable state of American military equipment.
Yes, thank you for this article. Definitely not good for our military… and how about the impact of dei in our medical fields – hospitals, clinics, etc.?? Many hospitals still promoting dei. Let that sink in.
I retired from Grumman at age 50 having started there at age 19 and worked my way up by gaining knowledge and going to college nights for 13 years to obtain a degree. In the late eighties four management positions opened up in our area. I did not qualify for the positions but several employees who I worked under in my career applied and they were the best and most qualified for the positions. As it turned out all four positions went to minorities! This time frame to me is when pushing minorities was a priority. Morale was impacted for employees saw this nonsense. Grumman sent me to some government schools where I met employees of other defense contractors and after class we gathered for dinner and always in the discussions Affirmative Action was brought up and every company seemed to be going through this nonsense of pushing minorities ahead regardless of ability and qualifications. It just made us sick but other employees picked up the slack to ensure a quality product was produced.
During this same period one of my siblings who was a sergeant on a highly paid police force took the civil service test for lieutenant. He was to be appointed on the last group from the civil service list. Another test was given and appointments from that list were to start the following year which was the procedure dictated. On the new list there was a minority, so the politicians wanted this minority to be seen as soon as possible so the manipulated the new and old lists and my sibling and several others lost promotions in order to bring this minority into view as window dressing for the community.
It seems that this garbage is going out the window and ability and knowledge will prevail over race, sex, etc.
A TRUSTED FEDETAL INVESTIGATION
TEAM needs to CLEAN HOUSE at L&M.
ANYONE AND EVERYONE responsible for caving into the DEI BS, from the top down, needs to be fired, those passed over for bonuses need to receive them, those that got them and promotions thanks too DEI need to be demoted and bonuses returned (or taken out of their future paychecks), those denied promotions should get them.
Further, L&M needs to be fined BIG BUCKS, AND BE PUT ON A 5-10 YEAR PROBATION. If ANY DEI or ANY left-wing progressive BS if forced on ANY employee or presented as required or volunteer training, in a memo or email, etc., they will lose any current and all future government contracts.
This was on news today: ICE just slammed two MS=13 members in Massachusetts murder and they were sentenced to 25-Years. In my opinion, this sentence is too easy & these are type criminals that should be deported to prison in El Salvador to never be seen or heard from again. Why should we pay to keep these people in our prisons? Get tough on these people & quit worrying about the people that are picking watermelons ? Trump campaigned that he was going after the worst criminal illegals and that should include all gang members of MS -13. And Trump never mentions how many of the insane people he has deported back to Venezuela or was that just a rumor of mental institutions?
????????????????????????????
The article states that our adversaries don’t care about DEI. I understand the point, but our adversaries care a great deal about DEI and CRT in America at every level. They love it, and they want it and they use it. It’s a weapon that they regularly exploit against the US. I’ll say it again, the problem is within our own borders, from the left, the dems/uniparty/swamp/globalists, the elitists, media and academia. THAT is the disease. Everything that happens outside our borders are merely the symptoms of the disease.
The Trump administration is exposing all of it and it’s all bubbling to the surface for all to see.
The Demofarts didn’t value much of anything worthwhile so why would they make an exception for National Security?