Newsline

Newsline , Society

Scotland’s Orwellian Anti-Free Speech Regime

Posted on Thursday, April 11, 2024
|
by Shane Harris
|
16 Comments
|
Print

AMAC EXCLUSIVE

scotland flag and free speech written over it

According to a new law which went into effect on April 1 in Scotland, telling an off-color joke, poking fun at someone online, or even expressing traditional religious views could land you in prison for up to seven years.

The law, officially titled the “Hate Crime and Public Order Act,” was first introduced in 2020 by Humza Yousaf, leader of the far-left Scottish National Party and the highest-ranking member of the Scottish government. Under the provisions of the legislation, it is now a criminal offense to “stir up hate” against certain protected identity groups, specifically racial minorities and individuals who identify as LGBT.

Despite supporters of the law claiming that it will create “safer communities that live free from hatred and prejudice,” its clear purpose is to use the power of the state to strike fear into anyone who dissents from left-wing cultural Marxist ideology. As National Review reports, “the law gives the police powers of entry, including the seizure of property, against suspects.” Notably, just one accusation that someone has committed a violation is enough to warrant a police raid.

Moreover, “citizens disturbed by wrong-think can drop into Stasi-esque reporting sites across the country, which… include an LGBT sex shop in Glasgow.” George Orwell himself could hardly have envisioned a more chilling system to suppress free speech.

The most terrifying aspect of the law is how vague its language is. According to a document published by the Scottish government in an effort to quell backlash to the legislation, anyone who “behaves in a threatening or abusive manner or communicates threatening or abusive material to another person” so that “hatred is intended or likely to be stirred up” is subject to being arrested and prosecuted.

And just who gets to decide what constitutes “threatening or abusive” language and whether or not “hatred” is “likely” to be stirred up? Inevitably left-wing prosecutors and judges of the same ideological persuasion as Yousaf and his allies.

Under the provisions of the bill, it is easy to imagine a transgender activist filing a complaint against a Catholic priest for opposing so-called “gender-affirming care” for minors. Making a joke on social media about a certain racial group could also now land the person who wrote the post in handcuffs. The expansiveness of the law allows the Scottish government and their left-wing activist allies to prosecute virtually anyone who threatens to undermine their ideology or break their grip on power.

Despite the Scottish government’s promise to throw people in prison for disagreeing with them, however, some courageous voices have already publicly challenged the law – including Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling.

Rowling, an outspoken liberal who currently lives in Scotland, is perhaps an unlikely hero for the conservatives leading the opposition to the law. But in recent years, Rowling has had a notably rocky relationship with the left due to her opposition to biological males participating in women’s sports and using female-only spaces.

In a series of posts on X shortly after the law went into effect, Rowling intentionally described trans-identifying males as men, daring the Scottish government to prosecute her. “I have been DELIBERATELY DEFIANT,” Rowling wrote in one post. “A full investigation MUST be mounted. #ArrestMe.”

Rowling’s open and public violation of the law effectively forced the Scottish government into a lose-lose situation. They could either enforce the law and arrest her, thereby creating a massive media firestorm, or not enforce the law, thereby publicly acknowledging that, since a famous author is not bound by the law, neither is anyone else. So far, Rowling has not been charged with any violation.

However, despite this apparent victory for free speech, the law remains in effect.

Moreover, while Scotland’s law might be the most blatant example of left-wing censorship and speech policing to date, it is hardly the only one. In Canada in 2021, for instance, a man was put behind bars after he refused to refer to his daughter, who began identifying as a boy, by male pronouns.

The Canadian Parliament is also now advancing its own “hate speech” bill that could prove even more radical than Scotland’s. As The New York Times reported on April 9, the proposed legislation would supposedly address the “anarchy and lawlessness of the internet” by allowing the government to prosecute “hate” as a crime in and of itself, rather than just adding it to other charges. It would also set up an entirely new agency to investigate and prosecute “hate speech.”

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association has come out in opposition to the bill, as has renowned Canadian writer Margaret Atwood, author of The Handmaid’s Tale – and another outspoken liberal.

Americans may feel inclined to rest easy by pointing to the First Amendment as a safeguard against such laws in the United States. And indeed, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in 1929, the First Amendment does guarantee “freedom for the thought that we hate.”

But First Amendment protections have not stopped the American left from using social media to censor speech that they disagree with in the online public square – all under the guise of stopping “hate speech” and “disinformation.” A generation of Americans have also now grown up in an education system that teaches that offensive speech is tantamount to physical violence. It is not a far ideological leap to argue that hate speech should, then, be prosecuted just as hate crimes currently are.

The First Amendment, like every other foundational American legal principle, is only as strong as the people’s belief in it. What is happening in Scotland and now Canada should be a dire warning for Americans to remain vigilant in protecting their fragile and precious liberties.

Shane Harris is a writer and political consultant from Southwest Ohio. You can follow him on Twitter @ShaneHarris513.

We hope you've enjoyed this article. While you're here, we have a small favor to ask...

The AMAC Action Logo

Support AMAC Action. Our 501 (C)(4) advances initiatives on Capitol Hill, in the state legislatures, and at the local level to protect American values, free speech, the exercise of religion, equality of opportunity, sanctity of life, and the rule of law.

Donate Now
Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lieutenant Beale
Lieutenant Beale
1 month ago

I’ll stick with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
(I swore an oath to protect it)
The other groups that want to take away said rights can pound sand.

Max
Max
1 month ago

Bottom line: the rest of the world’s governments are following the will of the Left and leaning toward a One World Order that will be “The Elite” over the rest of the population, controlling the lives of everyone. Everyone should realize that there are two major players in this situation — One World Order vs. a Fanatical Religious Regime — both want to rule the world — one by money, the other by religion. Beware!!

RIch
RIch
1 month ago

1984 meets Brave New World….

lawrence greenberg
lawrence greenberg
1 month ago

For those who don’t realize it, this law is analogous to “red flag” gun laws in this country. ANYONE can accuse ANYONE else of being a danger to themselves or others without the slightest shred of evidence and a judge can order a police raid to seize the accused’s firearms without the accused being told, before the seizure, of knowing who accused them of what or having an opportunity to respond to the charges.

anna hubert
anna hubert
1 month ago

Scottish National Party led by Humza Yousaf? Do they scream death to Scotland?

Joe
Joe
1 month ago

When Scotland makes the Unicorn its national animal, that should tell you everything about what direction they are going. William Wallace and Rob Roy are spinning in their graves.

GayleSmall
GayleSmall
1 month ago

Humza Yousaf must be an ancient Scottish surname?

Stephen Russell
Stephen Russell
1 month ago

See Australia & Canada too worse than Scotland

Dae
Dae
1 month ago

Scotland is No longer on My Travel Bucket List!

Al Francis
Al Francis
1 month ago

It is amazing that the land of “Braveheart” and Rob Roy would put up with this political excrement!

Robert Zuccaro
Robert Zuccaro
1 month ago

There’s a reason “Monty Pythons Flying Circus” did so many skits making fun of the Scots… and not just because they wear skirts!

Ken Paul
Ken Paul
1 month ago

Scot ideals transformed an underpopulated culturally backward nation of the 18th century into the best qualities America showcased at her inception. Sadly, Scotland has gone woke, and us along with it. Both nations now are tearing themselves apart out of some perverted sense of egalitarianism and national guilt. The USA, like Scotland, will soon be a relic of the most promising national cultures on planet earth.

An older blonde women laughing in the kitchen with a grey haired man.
AMAC’s Medicare Advisory Service
The knowledge, guidance, and choices of coverage you’re looking for. The exceptional service you deserve.
The AMAC App on 3 different iPhone
Download the AMAC App
The AMAC App is the place to go for insightful news wherever you are and whenever you want.
China taking American Farmland; american flag on barn
Confrontation between Trump and Biden on Trump Tax Cuts
Electoral Campaign

Stay informed! Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter.

"*" indicates required fields

16
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Subscribe to AMAC Daily News and Games