Newsline

Newsline , Society

Kissinger in Hindsight

Posted on Tuesday, December 5, 2023
|
by AMAC, Robert B. Charles
|
8 Comments
|
Print
Henry Kissinger and President Nixon

Working in the White House of George H. W.  Bush, my office lay across the hall from Room 208, the mysterious “Cordell Hull Room.” Hull was FDR’s Secretary of State, the longest at that post (1933-44). Between 1875 and 1947, the entire State Department fit in that room. In 1992, a little man sometimes clicked down the hall, thumbs hooked in his belt loops, and disappeared into that room. That man was Henry Kissinger.

Such was the influence of this diplomat, who just died at 100, that every president who followed Richard Nixon, for whom Kissinger was Secretary of State and National Security Advisor – at the same time – consulted with him on foreign policy.

Looking back, Kissinger will be remembered for half a dozen things, some good, some not so good, yet taken together, epic. Kissinger was, to borrow from a friend, “a titanic figure in every sense of that word.”

High energy, outsized ambition, embodiment of the American Dream, he was Jewish, escaped the Nazis, served in US Army intelligence (1943 to 1945), later earned his PhD from Harvard, where he dug into history to understand “great power politics,” how nations balanced power in the 1800s.

If he was a deep thinker, he was also oddly disconnected from the traditional moral compass, willing to think about big questions in purely practical terms, which had up and downsides.

As a tactician, negotiator, imaginative thinker, risk taker, and ultimately peacemaker, he was novel, different, uniquely suited to guide Richard Nixon, another smart, practical, complex, haunted leader.

Kissinger’s extraordinary grasp of history, power, geopolitics, and how humans can be guided to a useful conclusion was not much burdened by the moral nature of countries whose power needed balancing, thus his genius for problem-solving was offset by a weakness, underestimating moral imbalances.

Put differently, he won a Nobel Peace Prize for the “Paris Accords,” which brought the Vietnam War to an end but counseled intense carpet bombing, especially in Cambodia, causing good people to shudder.

Likewise, he opened China, but got little for it. China joined the modern world with many thinking economic inclusion would produce political freedom. That did not happen. Instead, the West has gradually underwritten the rise of their greatest mortal foe.

Between 1973 and 1975, Kissinger again showed genius, this time in the Middle East. He showed stamina, energy and the ability to prove trustworthy to nations hating each other.  He disentangled Israel, Egypt, and Syria after the October 1973 Yom Kippur War with “shuttle diplomacy.”

Applying his Harvard studies of “great power politics” and “spheres of influence” to modern times, he pushed “détente” – a concept used by Austria, France, and Great Britain mid-1800s – to reshape US and Soviet relations, triangulating China.

Notably, Kissinger’s approach to the Soviets bought time and reduced the chance of war, but was flawed. It failed to grasp what Ronald Reagan saw:  Soviet communism was illegitimate, evil, and could not stand.

Kissinger’s leadership in Vietnam, China, Middle East, and the Soviets was vital, a tour de force, world-changing, and in many ways brought stability that the Nixon White House needed, even at a high cost.

Why? Because Nixon’s White House was itself in crisis, disintegrating under a moral deficit, one closer to home, “Watergate.” Like Kissinger, Nixon had a worldview that allowed for compromise of character, a view aptly described as closer to amoral than moral.

Great leaders, back to biblical times, have been a mix of good and the bad, moral impulses that produced good things, amoral and immoral tolerances that stood in stark contrast.

Kissinger was a bit like that, a “first order” problem-solver, wise in ways of the world, witness to times rife with evil, times desperate for leadership, especially for peace, which he used history to deliver. 

But in many ways, this tactician always operated on one chess board, within the same four corners, convinced history was about power, not moral leadership, practical outcomes, not lofty ideas. 

As those close to Kissinger would tell you, while he was a close friend of conservative William F. Buckley, he was far removed from Buckley’s belief in one truth and the importance of moral leadership.

Kissinger – unlike Buckley – thought Ronald Reagan was wildly hopeful about the Soviet Union ever ending. Perhaps lack of imagination, preoccupation with power politics, but Kissinger could not see it.

Ronald Reagan, on the other hand, was all moral compass. He could see it.  Because Reagan could, he shifted away from Kissinger’s “realpolitik,” or “anything goes.” He threw down the gauntlet, declared good and evil exist, that we must choose good and not converge with evil, even when invited to.

This is the real closeout:  Kissinger was brilliant, no doubt. He was grateful to America, loved America, gave his life to serving America. He was effective, applied his grasp of history to the present. Doing so, he helped bring peace.  But, for all his brilliance, he missed what Reagan saw and history also teaches:  Moral leadership offers lasting solutions, where “realpolitik” is just a way to get by. 

For me, Kissinger exemplifies much that is good, he was an epic diplomat.  We could use some of that today. But he also represents error, putting practical above moral, even when the bar is high. I can still see him, clicking alone down that marble hall, turning into Cordell Hull, thumbs hooked in his belt loops.

Robert Charles is a former Assistant Secretary of State under Colin Powell, former Reagan and Bush 41 White House staffer, attorney, and naval intelligence officer (USNR). He wrote “Narcotics and Terrorism” (2003), “Eagles and Evergreens” (2018), and is National Spokesman for AMAC.

We hope you've enjoyed this article. While you're here, we have a small favor to ask...

The AMAC Action Logo

Support AMAC Action. Our 501 (C)(4) advances initiatives on Capitol Hill, in the state legislatures, and at the local level to protect American values, free speech, the exercise of religion, equality of opportunity, sanctity of life, and the rule of law.

Donate Now
Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dan W.
Dan W.
5 months ago

This article reminds everyone how fortunate we were to have had a Reagan presidency.

PaulE
PaulE
5 months ago

Thank God that Reagan had the vision and wisdom to break away from the conventional “realpolitik” view of “just getting by” of Kissinger, that permeated Washington when it came to the Soviet Union and foreign policy in general or the Soviet Union would still exist today. You don’t defeat an enemy and end a threat to the United States by simply preserving the status quo. There is a place for innovative thinking and clearly defined relationships as Reagan demonstrated.

Based on a few brief interviews Kissinger gave within the last year or so before passing away, he no doubt regretted at least some of his push to embrace communist China and bring it into the larger world order as a counter measure to the Soviet Union. Perhaps his worst miscalculation, as we, the West, took a starving, backwards, slowly crumbling communist China and transformed it into the second most powerful country on the planet that has a better plan to replace the United States on the world stage than the old Soviet Union ever did.

Ken Reed
Ken Reed
5 months ago

Kissinger advised the NVA in Paris that they would get a better deal from Nixon than from President Johnson. Thus, America’s POWs stayed another year in captivity in North Vietnam’s prisons. Bad advice Henry!

Stephen Russell
Stephen Russell
5 months ago

Kissinger was Great for Nixon & Vietnam era But went NWO WEF since 1975+
No good

Art Warmack
Art Warmack
5 months ago

Yet more BS regarding China being a “mortal foe” of the United States. What is true is that the US can, because of social decay primarily, never compete with China on an industrial level. Our people have proven they simply will not work a factory floor job or at least not for a sufficient time to become good at the job. The result is we are a pimple on the ass of the industrial world yet that pimple grows smaller each day.
As for China being some physical adversary may people be reminded who it is that has a crap ton of aircraft carriers for which to project power…..that is the US not China. Additionally it it the US with over 800 military bases and operational centers globally. China? ONE mainly to guard a port in Africa.
It is the US that is a dying “mortal foe” of any and all of its financial competitors. We became too lazy and slothful to compete so we do everything we can to…..steal.
God bless the USA?

Jeri
Jeri
5 months ago

At the point in history that Kissinger was operating what he did was amazing. I tend to blame those who picked up the work after him…think about that. He opened the door, who stepped in and screwed it up?

An older blonde women laughing in the kitchen with a grey haired man.
AMAC’s Medicare Advisory Service
The knowledge, guidance, and choices of coverage you’re looking for. The exceptional service you deserve.
The AMAC App on 3 different iPhone
Download the AMAC App
The AMAC App is the place to go for insightful news wherever you are and whenever you want.
President Joe Biden delivers remarks at the 77th Session of the United Nations General Assembly, Wednesday, September 21, 2022, at the United Nations Headquarters in New York. (Official White House Photo by Adam Schultz)
Los Angeles - 22 October 2020: Man Watching Trump vs Biden Presidential Debate on a Smartphone, Close-up
Text fake news written with a typewriter. Closeup of an old typewriter and the text fake news typewritten with it in a yellowish paper
Summary of statewide results of the 2008, 2012, 2016 and 2020 presidential elections by state Won by the Republicans in all four elections Won by the Republicans in three of the four elections Won by each party twice in the four elections Won by the Democrats in three of the four elections Won by the Democrats in all four elections

Stay informed! Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter.

"*" indicates required fields

8
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Subscribe to AMAC Daily News and Games