Newsline

Newsline , Society

IRS Is Holding U.S. Mineral Security Hostage

Posted on Wednesday, February 28, 2024
|
by Outside Contributor
|
6 Comments
|
Print
Extraction mineral in California desert

It may be surprising to hear tax guidance — of all things— could have enormous implications for national security and the competitiveness of the U.S. industrial base. Yet, that’s precisely what’s at stake with a critically important tax credit tucked into the Inflation Reduction Act. 

How the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service interpret the 45X advanced manufacturing tax credit could make or break an effort to reshore mineral production and address our alarming overreliance on overseas mineral supply chains, particularly those dominated by China.

In proposed guidance late last year, the IRS said critical minerals extraction activities and certain processing costs would be excluded from eligibility for the credit. It was a stunning proposal that ignores congressional intent and doesn’t make any sense.

The stakes are enormous. When Congress came together to pass the Inflation Reduction Act, legislators carefully and intentionally worked to address our mineral supply chain problem with an eye toward ramping up domestic mining. Lawmakers recognized that we are beholden to China, Russia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and other countries for vast percentages of the minerals U.S. manufacturing and automakers need. 

Of the 50 critical mineral commodities the U.S. Geological Survey lists as essential for U.S. economic and national security, China is the top producer or top supplier for 30. 

Our minerals vulnerability — often called the nation’s Achilles’ heel — is now a source of alarming strength and geopolitical leverage for our rivals.

In just the last 12 months, China has continuously threatened critical mineral supply chains with export controls or flooded the marketplace for metals —intentionally forcing U.S. suppliers to pause mine development or shutter.

John Podesta, the White House’s lead energy and climate adviser, recently said, “China has too much of a chokehold on critical minerals.” And President Biden’s national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, warned that mineral supply chains are “at risk of being weaponized in the same way as oil in the 1970s, or natural gas in Europe in 2022.”

The danger is obvious. And Congress, for its part, has worked to address it. But if an interpretation of the 45X tax credit goes sideways, a critical lever to bring these supply chains home will disappear.

U.S. mineral producers and processors have warned that without this incentive, proposed domestic projects will have to be canceled — the economics just won’t work.

There should be no confusion about how the guidance should be interpreted. The senators who played a crucial role in shaping the law in 2022 recently sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen urging a fix to the interpretation.

Those senators wrote, “The clear purpose of section 45X was to encourage investment in the United States and to build a reliable and resilient domestic supply chain for critical minerals right here at home.” They added, “We want to clarify that the blanket exclusion of materials costs is not consistent with the intent of Congress and should be expeditiously revised.”

It doesn’t get any clearer than that. The 45X tax credit is a golden opportunity to address our alarming mineral import reliance and begin the vital work of building these critical supply chains at home. But that work can’t start — or may never — unless we get this tax guidance right. 

The Inflation Reduction Act and the 45X tax credit were no cure-all to the nation’s mineral vulnerabilities, but they were an essential step in the right direction. It’s now critical that Treasury and the IRS let us take it.

Rich Nolan is president and CEO of the National Mining Association. He wrote this for InsideSources.com.

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of AMAC or AMAC Action.

Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
PaulE
PaulE
8 months ago

Why is anyone surprised that this administration would consider anything other than another means to hamstring industrial development in this country, while also finding a way for that bad decision to benefit China? That was a rhetorical question folks, as the answer is obvious. President Xi buying Old Joe for a few million dollars was the best investment communist China has made in the last decade.

David Millikan
David Millikan
8 months ago

Excellent article. The Inflation INCREASE (reduction) Act was nothing but a SCAM to DESTROY the United States Industries and America’s way of life. And today the IRS is holding us hostage thanks to Dictator Beijing biden, SWAMP QUEEN pelosi, and their Communist Party for their SCAM they passed and Dictator Beijing biden signed it.
Shows how much that it is NOT in the best interest of the country. Just look at your wallet and bank account including how many businesses have gone under because of the Inflation INCREASE (reduction) Act.
President Trump is Pro-Business and Pro-American.
Another reason I am voting for President Trump.

Rich
Rich
8 months ago

Why is the congress allowing a bureaucracy to create rules/laws?!!? Stop this!

Healthstay
Healthstay
8 months ago

very informative articles or reviews at this time.

Congress Spending Your Money. Congress spending and wasting your money.
AMAC Action Social Security Poll
Michigan flag color painted on Fiber cement sheet wall background. State coat of arms on a dark blue field. The state of America
Globe and USA Flag for background

Stay informed! Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter.

"*" indicates required fields

6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Subscribe to AMAC Daily News and Games