Newsline

Economy , Newsline

Kamala Harris Victory Would Steal Inheritance from Millions of Americans

Posted on Friday, September 27, 2024
|
by Shane Harris
|
12 Comments
|
Print

If Vice President Kamala Harris wins the presidency this November, the financial legacy millions of older Americans hope to leave to their children and grandchildren could be in jeopardy.

Late last month, Harris endorsed S. 4824, the American Housing and Economic Mobility Act. The bill, introduced by far-left Senator Elizabeth Warren, is ostensibly aimed at “tackling the U.S. housing crisis.” It promises to provide funding for building three million new housing units while “bringing down rents for lower-income and middle-class families by 10 percent.”

And just how do Warren and Harris propose to pay for all this new housing? By dramatically increasing the amount of estate tax, commonly known as the “death tax,” that Americans are forced to pay.

As part of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, one of former President Donald Trump’s signature legislative achievements, the federal estate tax exemption was boosted from $5.49 million per individual to $11.18 million in 2018. That amount, which is adjusted for inflation, has risen to $13.61 million in 2024.

In other words, only estates valued at more than $13.61 million are subject to the federal estate tax rate of 40 percent for the value of assets that exceed the exemption. In 2019, the last year for which IRS data is available, 0.08 percent of estate transfers were large enough to be subject to this federal tax.

As opponents of estate taxes argue, Americans already pay taxes on their income and other investments to build their wealth. The federal government should not then be able to tax that wealth when it is passed on to heirs.

However, the Trump tax cuts will sunset, or expire, at the end of 2025. This means that without action from Congress, the exemption will revert to pre-2018 levels, likely around $5.5 to $6 million depending on inflation adjustments.

S. 4824 would lower the exemption even further, to $3.5 million. The bill would also increase the tax rate from 40 percent to 55 percent for estates valued up to $13 million, 60 percent on any amount above $13 million to $93 million, and 65 percent on any remaining value above $93 million.

Notably, some states also levy their own estate taxes, as well as inheritance taxes paid by heirs. In Washington and Hawaii, the estate tax rate can be as high as 20 percent, while it can go up to 16 percent in Illinois and New York.

Exact figures on how many Americans the Harris-Warren proposal would affect are difficult to estimate because typically only estates valued at above the exemption are reported to the IRS. However, it is safe to say that cutting the exemption by nearly 75 percent would dramatically increase the number of estates subject to the tax.

Many older Americans may not even be aware that their estate could be taxed upon their death because their wealth is spread out across a number of investments. For example, if someone has a small business valued at $1 million, real estate holdings valued at $2 million, and $1 million in stocks, their estate would be subject to the tax.

Harris’s plan to end the step-up basis for estates would further increase the amount of taxes heirs are forced to pay by treating death as a taxable event for capital gains purposes. As Job Creators Network CEO Alfredo Ortiz put it, this proposal is “a massive attack on baby boomers planning their wills and dramatically reduces what they will be able to pass down to their heirs.”

Small business owners and farmers, who were some of the biggest beneficiaries of the Trump tax law, would be particularly hard hit by these changes.

The American Farm Bureau Federation reports that illiquid assets such as land, buildings, and equipment account for 82 percent of all farm assets. As a result, surviving family members often don’t have the cash to pay steep estate tax rates. If the exemption were lowered to $3.5 million and the step-up basis were eliminated, many family farms that already struggle to stay afloat would be forced to sell their land just to pay the taxes on it.

Entrepreneurs hoping to pass on their businesses to their children would also be hard hit. Someone hoping to take over a small business valued at $5 million from a parent who passed away could be forced to instead sell the business just to pay the taxes on it.

Additionally, the Harris-Warren bill would significantly reduce the annual gift tax exclusion and institute a new “generation skipping transfer tax” – bad news for grandparents looking to help their grandchildren through college or leave them money in a will.

Under current law, individuals can gift up to $18,000 per year to an unlimited number of people without that gift being subject to a tax. Under the Harris-Warren plan, that amount would drop to $10,000 per recipient with a total annual limit of $20,000.

Estate planners can also currently set up trusts with grandchildren and great grandchildren as beneficiaries which are not subject to federal estate taxes. Under the Harris-Warren plan, these exemptions would be eliminated.

All of these changes are just a few of the many headaches American families would face from Harris’s tax proposals. According to the Tax Foundation, Harris’s tax plan and overall economic agenda would result in an added tax burden of about $4.1 trillion from 2025 to 2034, reduce GDP by two percent, and cost the country 786,000 jobs.

Trump, meanwhile, has backed a far simpler proposal – extend all the provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act while expanding tax cuts for working- and middle-class families.

For Americans who have worked hard to build a nest egg to leave to their loved ones – and Americans still working to build a financial legacy of their own – a Harris victory this November would be a major threat.

Shane Harris is a writer and political consultant from Southwest Ohio. You can follow him on X @shaneharris513.

We hope you've enjoyed this article. While you're here, we have a small favor to ask...

The AMAC Action Logo

Support AMAC Action. Our 501 (C)(4) advances initiatives on Capitol Hill, in the state legislatures, and at the local level to protect American values, free speech, the exercise of religion, equality of opportunity, sanctity of life, and the rule of law.

Donate Now
Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Joseph
Joseph
58 minutes ago

Marxist scum. People better get out and vote and vote early. As the great President Trumps says, it must be too big to rig. We must turn in huge numbers to overcome the democRat cheating. MAGA

Theresa Coughlin
Theresa Coughlin
35 minutes ago

Here’s my problem with the death tax in a nutshell (and it;s already been mentioned in the article): You work hard you entire life to build a nest egg and pay taxes on everything you’ve earned during that time. After you die ( and your body’s not even cold yet), the government comes to your heirs with their hands out demanding more of your money. Where’s the “fairness” in that? Our deaths should NOT be a taxable event. The governments (I include the state and local governments in this comment, in addition to the federal government) has a spending problem NOT a revenue problem.

uncleferd
uncleferd
50 minutes ago

A Harris victory would turn the management of our national well-being over to a woman with the mind of a troubled adolescent, who lies like a street urchin character sketch… right out of Oliver Twist.

DR Schieferstein
DR Schieferstein
42 minutes ago

Great read. However, there is already a Generation-Skipping Tax (GST), a federal tax that applies to transfers of wealth to beneficiaries who are two or more generations younger than the donor. This often involves gifts or inheritances given to grandchildren or other relatives who are not the immediate children of the donor.
Also, your example, “if someone has a small business valued at $1 million, real estate holdings valued at $2 million, and $1 million in stocks, their estate would be subject to the tax” is not accurately depicted. Currently, estates over the exemption threshold of $13.61 million would be subject to the tax.
You are so spot on with everything else you explain. Please, everyone, do your homework and go vote!!!

Morbious
Morbious
23 minutes ago

Remember, estate taxes are taxes on whats left over after a lifetime of paying all sorts of taxes. They amount to asset seizure, various versions of which are being floated by the demon party. These people believe in an all powerful state where the individual is nothing.

anna hubert
anna hubert
27 minutes ago

Those proposals are tame in comparison of what’s to come if she gets in. Not only for the inheritors but for everyone who has a bit more then their fair share. Politicians and officials excluded. The creme de creme untouchable

Joe McHugh
Joe McHugh
20 minutes ago

Psst! Want to scuttle the Kamala Harris tax proposal? Easy, just drop the lower exemption level to ten thousand dollars. (That will ensure that the burger flippers will pay their fair share of the nation’s tax burden. That would get the attention of all who actually pay Federal income taxes currently. While most might feel empathy for the families who have assets worth over several million dollars, they would feel a bit more involved if THEIR taxes increased to 65-percent.
I suggest that concerned citizens write letters to Sen. Warren, and Kamala Harris urging them to promise to require ALL working Americans to help the government to be able to create more programs to “help those who were not as fortunate as others”. Kamala could then say that we will all feel better knowing that the oppressed will finally realize the advantages that the middle class families now enjoy. Let’s face it, if you are paying less than a 65% tax level on your earnings, you are a mean spirited, cold hearted and pitiless creature, right?

PapaGrouch
PapaGrouch
27 minutes ago

Funny how ideologically blind so many “Americans” insist to be, that they would give up everything just to commit themselves to Marxism. Doe the idea of living in the gulag appeal them that much? or they’re simply that butt blind. It’s incredibly arrogant and narcissist that so many of the wealthy and elite, who have made their fortunes under a capitalist economy so want Marxism, but “only for everyone else.” In the end, no one gets out alive and the Almighty Judge will return and reality of eternity arrives. One doesn’t have to believe it but it’s going to happen.

Ron
Ron
1 hour ago

A $2 trillion-dollar perpetual deficit is even worse. Massive spending cuts are needed along with tax increases.

Mary Sattler Peltola was sworn into the 117th Congress September 13, 2022.
A House of Barbed Wire: The American Dream Trapped by Reality. A tiny house against a blurred American flag and barbed wire symbolizes the fight for affordable housing and feeling trapped in an unreachable dream
Russel building senate capitol in washington dc view
Euro Symbol Monument and Coin Pile. The towering Euro currency symbol stands amid a pile of gold coins in front of a modern building, evoking the strength of the European economy

Stay informed! Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter.

"*" indicates required fields

12
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Subscribe to AMAC Daily News and Games