Newsline , Society

No, ObamaCare Did Not Reduce Federal Disability Rolls

Posted on Thursday, July 13, 2023
by Outside Contributor

When I was a member of the Social Security Advisory Board (SSAB) from 2006 through 2012, we were quite concerned with the rapid rise of federal disability benefit applications, awards, beneficiaries and amount of payments. The Disability Trust Fund was careening toward insolvency, large backlogs were developing in the Social Security Administration (SSA) hearings offices, and there was evidence that even the national labor market was affected significantly and noticeably by disability applicants and recipients withdrawing from work. Around this time, the hotly-debated Affordable Care Act (ACA, also called ObamaCare) was enacted and with it came large expansions of federally-funded health insurance through Medicaid. In particular, instead of narrowly covering specific groups, Medicaid would be provided to all individuals with family incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level.

Federal disability and these ACA expansions were often tied together. The SSAB was told by field agents at SSA and by academic experts that one of the main motivations for disability application was access to health insurance, either through Medicaid, via Supplemental Security Income (SSI) for those with no or spotty work records, or through Medicare, via Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) for those with steady employment. If low-wage workers could just get access to free and sometimes better health insurance through Medicaid, they argued, then these workers would not apply for SSI or SSDI and would not withdraw from the labor force.

It turns out that this was not true. 

According to a recent study, including a review of the professional literature through 2019 on this question, Williams College economists Lucie Schmidt, Lara Shore-Sheppard and Tara Watson (SSW) found that prior studies produced economically small and mixed effects of Medicaid eligibility on disability applications. But they also correctly noted that there were data and methodological problems with these studies, including possibly spurious correlations and trends.  

SSW set out to correct these issues and produce a definitive answer to the question. In particular, they took advantage of the natural experiment provided by the Supreme Court decision in 2012 on the constitutionality of the ACA that made Medicaid expansion optional for states, resulting in some states not expanding Medicaid and different timing of the remaining expansions, as well as some states having more generous income eligibility limits even before the ACA. SSW compared changes from 2010 through 2016 in county-level SSI and SSDI applications and awards in about 500 contiguous county pairs across a state border with different Medicaid eligibility, thereby avoiding the strong geographic correlation at the state level in the identity of which states expanded and disability trends. Counties bordering each other are more likely to share similar labor markets and be affected similarly by macroeconomic shocks. SSW use a continuous measure of the state Medicaid income eligibility limits, including no and when expansion, compared to state-specific pre-ACA limits, as well as time-varying controls such as demographics, and county and time fixed effects, in their difference-in-difference regression equations.

SSW definitively reject that Medicaid expansions reduced either SSI or SSDI applications or awards, in their words, “a fairly precisely estimated zero” effect for the relationship between Medicaid and the receipt of disability benefits. Various robustness tests, changing specifications, and variable inclusions, do not alter these results.

It is hard to know what the intellectual and political impact would have been if we had these results in the last decade when the ACA was debated and passed, and when the SSDI program was bailed out instead of reformed.  But having that knowledge now does counsel humility and prudence on big claims of cross-cutting program savings from large increases in government spending.

Reprinted with permission from AEI by Mark J. Warshawsky.

Share this article:
Notify of
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
USN Retired
USN Retired
4 months ago

This is a move toward total government control of the medical system (and money). SSI replaced welfare and is gaining more and more members of the population supporting the conversion to a communist way of life in the US. Soon the goverment will have total control, and the rug will be pulled out from under all these sheep that blindly follow the communist agenda of the Democrats. Although the promise appears to be valid, there is no free ride, just goverment elitest controling the pheasents living in poverty. The model exists in many countries out there. Sad to see it coming to the United States. Heaven help us.

4 months ago

Who thought it did? Only suckers and dolts.

Dan W.
Dan W.
4 months ago

This article reflects a keen grasp of the obvious. Like it or not, the purpose of Obamacare was not to reform Medicaid but to provide additional medical insurance options for those who couldn’t afford it.
Congress continues to sit on its hands anytime actual reform of Medicaid or Medicare or Social Security comes up. With the current do-nothing Congress living down to our expectations, I don’t see any reforms in sight in the near future.

4 months ago

The only thing I understood from this article is that the process of evaluating who qualifies for whatever labeled program ( Medicaid or SSI) is still very vague and open to interpretation and Congress, which can alleviate this issue is merely ignoring the problem and passing it forward creating a long term financial burden that can be corrected with proper legislation.

AMAC’s Medicare Advisory Service
The knowledge, guidance, and choices of coverage you’re looking for. The exceptional service you deserve.
The AMAC App on 3 different iPhone
Download the AMAC App
The AMAC App is the place to go for insightful news wherever you are and whenever you want.
antisemitism written out on blocks
Ronald and Nancy Reagan with model of the USS Ronald Reagan
Argentina ballot box vote card
President Biden sitting at his desk

Stay informed! Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter.

"*" indicates required fields

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x

Subscribe to AMAC Daily News and Games