Newsline

Newsline , Society

Mikhail Gorbachev: A Noble Failure

Posted on Thursday, September 1, 2022
|
by Daniel Berman
|
6 Comments
|
Print

AMAC Exclusive – By Daniel Berman

Gorbachev

It is difficult to describe Mikhail Gorbachev’s death at 91 this week as a tragedy. There are all the usual words, but ninety-one is a long life. He outlived virtually all of his contemporaries: Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Margaret Thatcher, Francois Mitterrand, Deng Xiaoping, and Helmut Kohl all predeceased him. Unlike those leaders, however, Gorbachev’s legacy is inevitably felt in the vacuum he left, not the institutions he built.

Many will say, with solid justification, that Ronald Reagan won the Cold War. His firm line and arms build-up cut short what had been a decade of Soviet advances in the 1980s and made it obvious, most importantly to the Soviet leadership, that America was not going to lose. But that this realization led to the end of the Soviet Union – an end that came about peacefully unlike in Yugoslavia, or without efforts to rejuvenate within the authoritarian system like in China – is a result of Mikhail Gorbachev and his idealism.

The irony of Gorbachev and the reason for his failure to save the Soviet Union ultimately comes down to the truth that he believed in it. A more cynical Soviet politician, a Beria perhaps, would have realized that the problem was not the way Communism was being implemented but Communism itself and abandoned it for capitalist economic methods as Deng did in China. Alternatively, understanding that the Soviet Union could not catch up to the West technically and economically, they might have resorted to using the Soviet Union’s military power to blackmail the West as Putin is doing today, demanding to be paid off to “preserve” peace.

Gorbachev never contemplated those measures because he genuinely believed Communism could work. In this view, the Soviet Union was failing not because the system was flawed, but because the people were. Eastern Europe was governed by thugs and criminals. If he allowed the removal of Eastern Europe’s local Communist strongmen, then the people could elect true socialists who would bring about prosperous democratic allies of the Soviet Union. Was this naïve? With hindsight, certainly. But it was because Gorbachev believed in the people of Eastern Europe “choosing the right way” that he was willing to risk giving them the chance.

The same was true of the Soviet Union. By allowing for the publication of the crimes of the Soviet State through glasnost, Gorbachev destroyed its legitimacy internationally, discrediting its apologists beyond hope of recovery. A cynic who saw the Soviet Union as their personal property would never have risked devaluing its brand. But Gorbachev, because he believed in its mission, felt its betrayals should be aired out.

It is a tragedy of history that while the world, along with the people of Eastern Europe, the Baltic, and arguably many Russians benefited from these “mistakes,” Gorbachev himself was condemned as a traitor. There is fairness in this. As a General Secretary of the Soviet Communist Party and President of the Soviet Union, he failed in his stewardship of both. In fact, as neither survived his leadership, it is hard to point to greater failures of management in history, especially as Gorbachev himself never intended to see either vanish.

That is the view adopted by Russian nationalists who saw the Soviet Union not as a multi-national state or a socialist federation as Gorbachev did, but as a Russian Empire. He is the man who gave up their status as a superpower, and even gave Crimea to Ukraine, and received nothing in return from the West but contempt. For them, nothing characterized the 1990s more perfectly than Gorbachev’s appearance in an infamous ad for Pizza Hut.

Yet it is easy to pass judgement in hindsight. Before Gorbachev, it was impossible to find milk or fresh meat in Moscow supermarkets. Even in the depths of the 1990s there were goods in every store, even if some struggled to afford them consistently. Until recently, Russians could travel, which millions, especially Jews, used to move to the United States and Israel. Russians who are so eager to say they would trade the unstable freedom of the post-1991 era for the Soviet regime may come to rue that conclusion in the years ahead as a new Iron Curtain falls, cutting them off from Western goods, Western travel, and the wider Internet.

At the same time, the barbarity and brutality of the current conflict in the Ukraine, which has already produced nearly 5 million refugees, is a hint at what could have happened had Gorbachev “failed” more violently as Slobodan Milosevic did in Yugoslavia. The nature of Gorbachev’s failure and refusal to use overwhelming force meant that if there was economic uncertainty and political humiliation, there was no war and destruction for thirty years.

That goes to the heart of the recognition Gorbachev deserves. Leaders have failed for many reasons throughout history: greed, prejudice, vindictiveness, sadism, and fanaticism. The traits that contributed to Gorbachev’s failure to preserve the Soviet Union or Communist Party are entirely positive traits. Idealism, a reluctance to use violence, a lack of malice toward others even when they undermined or betrayed him, and ultimately too much, rather than too little, faith in humanity. Gorbachev may not have been too good for this world, but he was ultimately a man too good for Soviet or Russian politics. That fact says as much about the Soviet Union and Communism as it does about Gorbachev. If Communism could only be preserved by a monster, and the Soviet Union was doomed the first time a decent human being took the helm, then what further confirmation is needed that those systems did not deserve to survive?

There are many successful leaders who left the world a worse place. There are many failed leaders who left disaster in their wake. Gorbachev is the rare political failure who may well have helped as many if not more people than if he had “succeeded” in preserving Communist rule for another decade through more cynical means. The millions who benefited can wholeheartedly wish that he will finally be able to rest in peace, reunited with Raisa at last.

Daniel Berman is a frequent commentator and lecturer on foreign policy and political affairs, both nationally and internationally. He holds a Ph.D. in International Relations from the London School of Economics. He also writes as Daniel Roman.

Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bill on the Hill
Bill on the Hill
1 year ago

Gorbachev & myself share the same birthday, he will be missed for a multitude of reasons & most of them are good…
Bill… :~)

Dan W.
Dan W.
1 year ago

Gorbachev did not cede Crimea to Ukraine. That was Nikita Khrushchev in 1954.

Dennis Math
Dennis Math
1 year ago

It is hoped that the man didn’t know the extent of western greed nor the complicity Russian oligarchs would have with the western bounty seekers in the decade following the dissolution of the old Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union. If he was aware than Gorbachev was truly an evil traitor because EVERY agreement signed with the west was subsequently ignored and the looting began as did the expansion of NATO which was promised to not happen if the Soviet Empire was dissolved. As usual the western countries looted and pillaged until the Russian people got lucky enough to get people in power to put a stop to the looting and the crimes against the state of Russia.
The ignoring of law continued to the ignoring of the Minsk Agreement which has now led to what we see happening in Ukraine. The ignorant in the west can keep their irrational hatred of Russia but the people that bother to do ANY research will see that the Ukraine conflict was brought upon Ukraine by the United States and its eager lapdogs that make up NATO.
Perhaps when the Russian speaking part of Ukraine becomes part of Russia soon and western European countries are shivering in the hovels this winter someone might actually see the errors of their ignorant ways!

Brad
Brad
1 year ago

I can’t speak for others but I believe that Mikhail Gorbachev was the only decent premier that the Soviet Union ever had. He was the murderous thug that all his predecessors had been. It is surprising to me that a man of his character and caliber made it to the top leadership spot in the Soviet system. Rest peacefully Mr. Gorbachev.

An older blonde women laughing in the kitchen with a grey haired man.
AMAC’s Medicare Advisory Service
The knowledge, guidance, and choices of coverage you’re looking for. The exceptional service you deserve.
The AMAC App on 3 different iPhone
Download the AMAC App
The AMAC App is the place to go for insightful news wherever you are and whenever you want.
Confrontation between Trump and Biden on Trump Tax Cuts
Electoral Campaign
Joe Biden In-front Of An American Flag. Joe Biden walking on stage at a campaign rally for Terry McAuliffe in Arlington Virginia.

Stay informed! Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter.

"*" indicates required fields

6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Subscribe to AMAC Daily News and Games