Newsline

National Security , Newsline

A Federal Appeals Court Just Took a Big Swing at Planned Parenthood

Posted on Friday, January 18, 2019
|
by Outside Contributor
|
3 Comments
|
Print

Planned Parenthood ugly truth pregnantThe 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals lifted an injunction forbidding Texas from stripping Planned Parenthood of Medicaid funds Thursday, while stridently criticizing the abortion provider for its rhetoric and medical practices.

“Planned Parenthood’s reprehensible conduct, captured in undercover videos, proves that it is not a ‘qualified’ provider under the Medicaid Act, so we are confident we will ultimately prevail,” Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement after Thursday’s ruling.

The case arose after a pro-life group called the Center for Medical Progress released videos purporting to show Planned Parenthood violating medical and ethical standards codified in federal law and state regulations. Texas terminated its Medicaid provider agreement with Planned Parenthood shortly thereafter, citing infractions documented in the videos.

In turn, Planned Parenthood asked a federal court to restore its Medicaid funding. Thursday’s ruling—which related to a jurisdictional issue in that case—is especially striking for its numerous rebukes of Planned Parenthood. Judge Edith Jones, a Ronald Reagan appointee, delivered the opinion.

Perhaps the most noteworthy of the decision’s reprimands is a graphic depiction of post-abortion fetal remains taken from a Center for Medical Progress video on the fourth page of the opinion. A small arm is visible in the picture. Texas cited the manner in which Planned Parenthood disposes of fetal remains as one reason for terminating its Medicaid eligibility.

In another instance, the decision all but accuses Planned Parenthood of breaking federal law banning partial-birth abortions. The ruling highlights a Center for Medical Progress video in which an administrator called Dr. Tram Nguyen said doctors at one facility could evacuate an intact fetus—thereby breaking federal law—provided they sign a form that they did not “intend” to do so. Such procedures allow researchers to recover organs like the thymus or the liver.

Later in the opinion, the panel chides Planned Parenthood for failing to address Nguyen’s comments in court filings.

“The plaintiffs’ briefing with regard to the substance of the discussions contained in the videos is curiously silent,” the decision reads.

Planned Parenthood has denied it intentionally alters abortion procedures for impermissible reasons.

The panel also dismissed Planned Parenthood’s claim that the Center for Medical Progress videos were “deceptively edited,” a soundbite that redounded across the press after the tapes first appeared.

“The record reflects that [the Texas Office of Inspector General] had submitted a report from a forensic firm concluding that the video was authentic and not deceptively edited,” a footnote in the decision reads. “And [Planned Parenthood] did not identify any particular omission or addition in the video footage.”

Finally the panel accused the judiciary of politicking on abortion cases. Ordinarily, providers like Planned Parenthood must challenge Medicaid termination decisions in an administrative forum and state court before seeking a federal court’s intervention. By allowing Planned Parenthood to skip directly to federal court—as the trial court did here—the 5th Circuit said judges are engaging in ideological favoritism.

“Had [Texas] terminated the Medicaid provider agreements of any other type of health care provider, the incongruity of allowing that provider to use patient litigation proxies to avoid administrative review and [reach] federal court would be obvious and unacceptable,” the ruling reads.

The decision comes as pro-life activists gather in Washington in advance of Friday’s March for Life.

The question before the 5th Circuit did not relate to abortion directly: After Texas disqualified Planned Parenthood from Medicaid eligibility, the abortion provider sued, claiming the federal Medicaid statute allowed it to do so. A federal district judge agreed, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. The 5th Circuit had to decide whether that decision was correct.

The federal appeals courts are divided over the answer to that question. Though the Supreme Court generally intervenes when the circuits disagree over the same question of law, the justices denied review in a related controversy from Kansas in December, drawing a vigorous dissent from Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch that accused the court of playing politics.

In that instance, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined with the court’s liberal bloc, effectively preserving a pro-Planned Parenthood decision in the lower court.

The 5th Circuit’s Thursday decision concluded that it is bound by precedent to find Planned Parenthood can proceed with its lawsuit in federal court under the Medicaid statute, though Jones wrote a concurrence to her own majority opinion urging the full 5th Circuit to revisit that question.

However, the 5th Circuit gave Texas a partial victory, finding the trial court assessed Planned Parenthood’s request for an injunction under the wrong standard. The panel lifted the injunction, and ordered the lower court judge to reconsider Planned Parenthood’s request under a different standard that is more accommodating of Texas.

As such, the state has a much better chance of prevailing when the matter returns to the trial court for further proceedings.

Texas awards approximately $3.4 million to Planned Parenthood affiliates through Medicaid annually. The decision notes this is a “smidgen” of the revenue Planned Parenthood’s Texas affiliates generate each year, which runs over $57 million.

Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Celeste
Celeste
5 years ago

Please stop all tax monies from going to Planned Parenthood!!!!!!

Susie
Susie
5 years ago

Would the amount of tax dollars going to Planned Parenthood pay for the wall?

LPO
LPO
5 years ago

Abortions, with their own money, is one thing. For me to finance is another, entirely. Now that some state elected officials have decided it is legal to abort after delivery, a newborn citizen is slaughtered with their blessing. The audacity to demand taxpayers fund their lack of moral compass and to participate in this decision is intolerable. If judges refuse to hear these cases, and stop the violations against our law, then citizens must refuse to pay. I myself cannot in good conscience (due to my faith), finance slaughter of human beings. I cannot in good conscience support lawless state government, (which we seem to be currently dominated by) . The socialists here want our government to pay for their lack of judgment / discipline, as well as finance their desires and their needs. Sorry but I have to suffer the consequences of my mistakes, my lack of moral compass, and my lack of discipline; as no other taxpayer eliminates these consequences for me. I am not required to eliminate the consequences of theirs either. I can relinquish all US benefits, US citizenship, and join the illegal bunch here in sanctuary or I can find a country where ‘lawlessness’ is not the desired form of government. I would rather die in peace with a clear conscience, than be an accessory to murder.

Charities
A panoramic view United States Capitol Building at Washington, DC, USA with American flag.
Deportation Gavel and Blocks. A wooden gavel rests on a wooden table, symbolizing the legal proceedings of deportation. Two wooden blocks with the word DEPORTATION
Vice President-elect U.S. Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) departs from the Senate Chambers during a vote in the U.S. Capitol on December 18, 2024 in Washington, DC. Support among Republicans for a proposed federal government budget continuing resolution was put in jeopardy after billionaire Elon Musk announced his opposition.

Stay informed! Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter.

"*" indicates required fields

3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Subscribe to AMAC Daily News and Games