Parental rights are under attack from multiple sources. These attacks are fundamentally anti-family, anti-religious, anti-traditional, and – at their root – unconstitutional, thus anti-American. Parents – indeed anyone who cares about the primacy of family over the State – must speak up. This is now the time.
Attacks on traditional, constitutional and statutory rights of parents have begun to cluster around core issues, including reinterpretation of due process, equal protection, state educational and domestic law definitions, and the reach and meaning of established federal laws, such as Title IX.
These laws protect parents, and in this way protect the nuclear family, children within the family, religious and family values – all against State overreach, preventing unconstitutional intrusion into the zone of privacy, moral teachings, and traditions of families, by schools or any kind of government.
So fundamental is protecting the family against the State, and prerogatives of parents in raising of their children, that only in cases of egregious criminal behavior or parsing parental rights on voluntary dissolution of the family, has the State has a role in assessing respective rights.
Until now, no government entity – including even the most brazen politicians, school administrators, teachers, government-funded non-profits, political organizations, or medical providers – have dared to assert that they have a right superior to parents’ God-given rights in raising their children as they see fit.
Unthinkable has been the idea that longstanding constitutional protections, statutes, and caselaw created over centuries to protect the family unit and values cultivated in the family, including morally, spiritually, emotionally, psychologically, and physically educating children – could be taken by the State.
Yet that is where we are. We are at a terribly consequential, sobering and objectively frightening intersection between rising State assertions of power over parents, in the name of social, moral, and physical control, and the long and well-worn road that is societal preservation of a healthy, free, and largely moral society through family primacy.
Specifically, government entities – from the Biden White House and Democrats in Congress, to left-leaning State leaders, down through unaccountable school boards and administrators, pumped up by activists, dark money, and media – seek to challenge, marginalize, and apparently displace parental rights.
They increasingly claim the right to exercise control – directly and through intimidation – over every aspect of a child’s education and self-definition, from what they will be taught, allowed to believe morally, psychologically, about everything from science to history, and even about their gender.
More grotesque, some of these self-inflated, self-appointed, non-parental custodians of the nation’s children believe they now have the right – even more absurdly an obligation – to permit secret changes in the child’s sexual, gender and personality identity, up to and including secret sexual mutilation. This is, ironically, a form of child abuse we condemn globally.
The arrogance of this new social turn, much of it premised on a Marxist reinterpretation of social structure, is only exceeded by the sheer horror of it, for parents and children. The relative silence by so many in these various communities – from Congress to school boards – is almost as arresting. That said, the power of parents to correct this turn is enormous, if used.
Basic questions need to be asked, with knowledge of longstanding laws, moral and social traditions, and family rights – all of which cut against, undermine, and completely oppose this new anti-parent trend.
A century ago, the US Supreme Court ruled that a “child is not the mere creature of the State,” and “those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations,” that this is a sacred right of parents, not the state. That was in 1925, Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510.
In 1972, they ruled in Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, that parents possess the fundamental rights “in the companionship, care, custody, and management” of their children, hammering the point in Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972): “This primary role of the parents in the upbringing of their children is now established beyond debate as an enduring American tradition.”
In 1997, reinforcing past law, they affirmed in Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997) that the 14th Amendment’s due process clause protects the “fundamental right” of parents to direct the care, upbringing, and education of their children.
In 2000’s Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000), they “unequivocally affirmed” a parent’s right to raise their children, and “no reason for the State to inject itself into the private realm of the family to further question the ability of the parent to make the best decisions concerning the rearing of that parent’s child.” In sum, they barred “an unconstitutional infringement on” the parent’s “fundamental right to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control” of children.
Yet where are we? Despite these rulings, reinforced by other constitutional and statutory language, such as exercise of religion, equal rights for biological girls, and parental primacy in family decisions, the government seeks – using leftist ideology – to assert control.
This cannot stand, because it flies in the face of all that is American, from protection of the family and innocence of children to rule of law, both constitutional and statutory. With the voices of more than 60 million parents of young children, another 120 million grandparents, this must not stand. The time has come…to defend parental rights – urgently.
Robert Charles is a former Assistant Secretary of State under Colin Powell, former Reagan and Bush 41 White House staffer, attorney, and naval intelligence officer (USNR). He wrote “Narcotics and Terrorism” (2003), “Eagles and Evergreens” (2018), and is National Spokesman for AMAC.
When Hillary Clinton stated that it took a village to raise children, I knew that parental rights were being threatened. Look where we are today!
Stand up! Speak up! Vote knowledgeably!
It is time to get rid of the Dept. of Education as it is the main source of producing some of the most stupid laws to take Parental rights away. Then each state needs to revamp their own rules for education and get rid of “WOKE” agenda. I won’t my breath for this to happen anytime soon.
May Courage and a sense of Responsibility prevail — in the defense of Faith, Family and Freedom. Great article, and you provided great incentive to be at the ready, at anytime, from the various devious , corrupt, and anti- American elements . Knowing the strategy, and recognizing the tactics used by the enemy and emphasizing the urgency to act in defense of family — you have helped to make sure that this will be a victory for American values. Well Done , Robert . I reckon this issue is one of the most important , second only to the battle against human trafficking in terms of urgency, and it looks like many Americans of good conscience are taking action with that too. Reasons to be optimistic about making for a better world in the very near future. In the spirit of respect for the will of God , and the principles at the foundation of the United States of America , especially the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights of the Constitution — great accomplishments are always possible when a sense of resourcefulness is developed.
.
If the liberals had tried this with the WWII generation, they would have paid with their lives. That should still be the case!
it takes a village to raise children used in its actual context means that the other villagers worked in alliance with the parents making sure they behave like they were brought up in a home and not a house. But like everything else with Democrats it takes on a sinister meaning.
Hello I’m Robert Charles. Parental rights is very important. Even more so now that my own child has stopped listening to me and hates me.