AMERICANS HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW …
All about the soft coup against POTUS.
Our tax dollars paid for it, and now we DEMAND transparency,
let the chips fall where they may.
GBA/MAGA/#TRUMP2020 !
Greg M.
5 years ago
How about make one of the choices be to make public everything that can be made public. There are elements of the report, as Barr said, that cannot, by law, be made public, grand jury testimony, etc. That is my preference.
Kim
5 years ago
The Mueller report is one big can of worms, so I don’t think I’d like to open it.
For those who enjoy fishing expeditions, such as CNN and other MSM, they could stay occupied for years!
PaulE
5 years ago
AG Barr, by law cannot simply release the report without first redacting all grand jury testimony, anything related to national security or other items clearly specified in the federal law governing this report. Barr has stated he plans to release the report, within a week or so, adhering to these lawful guidelines. To do otherwise, as your survey seems to suggest, would be a violation of federal law and grounds for his dismissal and arrest. I would have hoped AMAC would have bothered to research what the guidelines are for the release of the Mueller Report, but it seems not. Instead it seems AMAC, like the Democrat Party and left-wing MSM seems to think the law should only be followed when it is convenient. Sad, very sad.
Brian B
5 years ago
Attorney General William Barr cannot legally release the Mueller Report unredacted in its entirety. The Democrats know this. The Democrats and their mainstream media co-conspirators merely want to suggest to the American public that the President and his AG are trying to conceal evidence of some heretofore undisclosed criminal activity. Their complaints (as usual) are nothing but pure politics designed to deceive. But Democrats should be careful what they wish for. Mueller’s Report undoubtedly has many “loose-ends” that could eventually lead to the indictments of key Democrats. Obama, Hillary and their Deep State Operatives may have to be fitted out in orange jumpsuits once Barr has completed the investigation that Mueller’s team only began. Poetic justice at it’s finest. MAGA
slyltc
5 years ago
I agree with Greg M. and PaulE., Except for Paul E’s last sentence. AMAC should have included a fourth option to release all that can be legally made public. AMAC certainly did not do its homework on this poll. As asked it is invalid. Brian B. provides a very concise and thoughtful analysis, as well.
DON WALZER
5 years ago
ILLEGAL TO RELEASE IN ENTIRETY1
Jim forry
5 years ago
It’s over our President did no wrong. Let it be done. Better things to spend time and money on. Like the wall and term limits. Also let’s go after the lying cheating democrats
Natalie Quill
5 years ago
Can’t answer the way the questions are written
Gina F
5 years ago
I would like to see the proof published that shows out president has never colluded with the Russians and I would like to see the evidence that the Obama Admin did to spy and cause damage to President Trump. The man has worked his butt off for America while these past presidents proceeded to break laws right and left and get rich off the people. President Trump has had his name put through the ringer and it is time that msm hang up their bull and start once again reporting facts and not their fiction writings.
Darlene Baggett
5 years ago
Wait two years or better before members of Congress see it.
michael towler
5 years ago
Release that which the law allows and the dems can suck wind over the rest. Now let’s get ont to important problems, like investigating, arresting and incarcerating prominent dems and rinos who were involved in this sham.
Robert Mcelhinney
5 years ago
I believe that a redacted report should be relieced that we the people can make our decision on it .
Michael G
5 years ago
Your question does not allow an honest complete answer as the answer choices don’t correctly associate with the started questions.
Barry Lubrant
5 years ago
I simply don’t have enough information to make a decision. There could be valid security reasons to redact the report.
Dave O
5 years ago
I can not vote in the poll because there is no appropriate choice. Of course, I want the report made public but only the parts that can legally be shared. The entire report, by law, can not be made public.
John M
5 years ago
Release the report. Naturally it would be only a legal release to assume otherwise ? IMO this has the potential to make Watergate a non story.
Dick B
5 years ago
It can’t be released in its entirety, the law has protections. You haven’t given enough choices in the poll
William P DeLoach
5 years ago
A poorly written question!
William Martin
5 years ago
Release what is legal to release and let the democrats suffer about who will be locked in jail. Go for it Attorney General Barr.
Tom Edwards
5 years ago
We should be able to see as much as law allows!
Brian C. Lundin
5 years ago
C’mon AMAC. This isn’t an all or nothing report. AG Barr CANNOT release verbatim the report in its entirety as per LAW. I want what can legally be released, which AG Barr has said he will do. I’m positive there will be enough there to sink many a Democrat’s, and their flunkies, ship, that will be released. It’s time to get this country the rest of the way back on track. MAGA President Trump!
Susan
5 years ago
I think the report should be released to the PUBLIC before Congress (following the legal guidelines). We are very capable of making our own decisions without Congress spin
William J Wiggins
5 years ago
The report should be made public with the redaction’s in place.
Calvin Masaoka
5 years ago
The President said before the report was released that he did a mind if it was made public so take him at his word.
Jeffery K West
5 years ago
I would like to see it made public. As long as it is done legally according to the law.
Marvin B. Daniel Peláez
5 years ago
I think the issue is about the report being redacted vs. not being redacted. There was no option to select “choose to release redacted report publicly.”
Cinda
5 years ago
I voted for the public release but I think that all info. Should not be released. Under the law for security reasons there are parts that should not be told, grand jury info and names are not to be released. I should have voted Not to release because of the wording.
Dale Ratcliff
5 years ago
We the people have paid out over 25 million dollars for it. We deserve to see what we paid for.
Rodney C.
5 years ago
The public paid millions of dollars for this report. It should be made public and the lies should be exposed and prosecuted.
Diane
5 years ago
It doesn’t matter whether it is released or not. The Democrats will interpret it the way they want to spin it. They wouldn’t recognize truth if it slapped them in the face.
BobA
5 years ago
Laws are made for a good reason. The report should be released accordingly. Libs keep bringing up the Starr report on Clinton and that it was released in its entirety. Well it was because the law was different back then. A 1978 statute which allowed the entire investigation to be released expired in 1999, included investigations of people who didn’t break any law but reading the report casts a negative impression on them. The 1999 statute eliminated the allowing of the entire report to eliminate this and included giving the Attorney General more power to decide how much of the final report of the investigation would be released to the public, if anything.
Rodney C.
5 years ago
The public paid millions of dollars for this report. It should be made public and the liars should be prosecuted and jailed.
Christopher
5 years ago
How about make the ken star report public. The democrats are running scared because they are guilty of crimes and attack the President on a daily basis. It will be interesting to find out the real truth. I hope that Barr actually conducts a thorough investigation,im thinking Obama will be right at the top of the heap.
JOHN GRIFFITH
5 years ago
After appropriate redactions, yes, it should be released. The democrats will not be able to spin the results if the public is aware of the conclusions!
Barbara S
5 years ago
The issue has been investigated, the experts charged with analyzing and judging have done their job. I trust that these people are competent and do not need to be scrutinized by partisan public opinion. We all have the right to disagree, but to question these individuals’ integrity truly undermines everything on which American democracy was founded.
Arteest
5 years ago
No. The AG must follow the law. If this one is revealed then we must go back through history and reveal all of them. And what would that accomplish? The brain trust of DC would have something else to waste time on and screw up.
Steve Fitzmaurice
5 years ago
I’m not an attorney, however, I know there are solid legal reasons why an unredacted report can’t be released. If the report is edited to protect innocent individuals mentioned in the report and for the other proper legal reasons, why not release the report? Presently, this is nothing but something for the Dems to grab onto since the enormous time and energy wasted by Mueller produced zip, nada, nothing!
Larry D Turner
5 years ago
If they release it; then Dems will find out, & my beloved Trump will be impeached.
Ric E.
5 years ago
What Demoncratic Socialist wrote this question? It is poorly written and can not be accurately answered.
Eddie
5 years ago
We needed a third option to release that which can legally be released.
JAE
5 years ago
Poll questions are poorly chosen. Where’s the question asking for a redaction of grand jury testimony?
Don G
5 years ago
It doesn’t matter which option is chosen in the end. This entire effort has been so contentious from all aspects. If there’s the slightest hint of any impropriety, the Democrats will continue to use any and all aspects of the report to attack President Trump. The Republicans will distort the findings that will also continue the debate. If it’s not made public, doubt will forever remain. Until there’s an equivalent special prosecutor assigned to investigate the wrongdoings of the left, the right will cry foul. This entire costly investigation is not about justice. It’s an exposé on the corruption in our American government. There is absolutely no acceptable resolution that will satisfy all of the parties involved. Sad state of politics in the US.
Mary L Sedwick
5 years ago
I agree parts should be released but I’m sure all can’t be. They have to protect individuals who have testified and any classified information.
William Antonini
5 years ago
I do not believe its release will have a damaging effect on our relations with the British Government.
If that be the case then we would have long ago become a clanging symbol and not a bell of freedom to liberty which we claim to be.
What took place at the highest eschelons of our Federal Government, while not totally understood by most Americans, will continue into the future.
We would be a lesser Nation and not deserving of the esteem some in the world now grant us.
Karen Bursley
5 years ago
I think anything that is legal should be made public. Whatever is not, should remain private. We need to start enforcing our laws. They are out there for a reason.
Martin Benedict Sr
5 years ago
No redacted information should be made public
Marsha Whittemore
5 years ago
Define “in it’s entirety”……If that means it should be released WITH the redactions required under the law, then YES, release it. The law must be adhered to, period.
James Capehart
5 years ago
Your Poll questions are incomplete, there should be one more question, “Yes, it should be released publicly in accordance with the law?”
Joseph Fidler
5 years ago
I don’t like this “all or nothing choice.” I am sure there are things in the report which could compromise national security or of a personal nature.
AMERICANS HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW …
All about the soft coup against POTUS.
Our tax dollars paid for it, and now we DEMAND transparency,
let the chips fall where they may.
GBA/MAGA/#TRUMP2020 !
How about make one of the choices be to make public everything that can be made public. There are elements of the report, as Barr said, that cannot, by law, be made public, grand jury testimony, etc. That is my preference.
The Mueller report is one big can of worms, so I don’t think I’d like to open it.
For those who enjoy fishing expeditions, such as CNN and other MSM, they could stay occupied for years!
AG Barr, by law cannot simply release the report without first redacting all grand jury testimony, anything related to national security or other items clearly specified in the federal law governing this report. Barr has stated he plans to release the report, within a week or so, adhering to these lawful guidelines. To do otherwise, as your survey seems to suggest, would be a violation of federal law and grounds for his dismissal and arrest. I would have hoped AMAC would have bothered to research what the guidelines are for the release of the Mueller Report, but it seems not. Instead it seems AMAC, like the Democrat Party and left-wing MSM seems to think the law should only be followed when it is convenient. Sad, very sad.
Attorney General William Barr cannot legally release the Mueller Report unredacted in its entirety. The Democrats know this. The Democrats and their mainstream media co-conspirators merely want to suggest to the American public that the President and his AG are trying to conceal evidence of some heretofore undisclosed criminal activity. Their complaints (as usual) are nothing but pure politics designed to deceive. But Democrats should be careful what they wish for. Mueller’s Report undoubtedly has many “loose-ends” that could eventually lead to the indictments of key Democrats. Obama, Hillary and their Deep State Operatives may have to be fitted out in orange jumpsuits once Barr has completed the investigation that Mueller’s team only began. Poetic justice at it’s finest. MAGA
I agree with Greg M. and PaulE., Except for Paul E’s last sentence. AMAC should have included a fourth option to release all that can be legally made public. AMAC certainly did not do its homework on this poll. As asked it is invalid. Brian B. provides a very concise and thoughtful analysis, as well.
ILLEGAL TO RELEASE IN ENTIRETY1
It’s over our President did no wrong. Let it be done. Better things to spend time and money on. Like the wall and term limits. Also let’s go after the lying cheating democrats
Can’t answer the way the questions are written
I would like to see the proof published that shows out president has never colluded with the Russians and I would like to see the evidence that the Obama Admin did to spy and cause damage to President Trump. The man has worked his butt off for America while these past presidents proceeded to break laws right and left and get rich off the people. President Trump has had his name put through the ringer and it is time that msm hang up their bull and start once again reporting facts and not their fiction writings.
Wait two years or better before members of Congress see it.
Release that which the law allows and the dems can suck wind over the rest. Now let’s get ont to important problems, like investigating, arresting and incarcerating prominent dems and rinos who were involved in this sham.
I believe that a redacted report should be relieced that we the people can make our decision on it .
Your question does not allow an honest complete answer as the answer choices don’t correctly associate with the started questions.
I simply don’t have enough information to make a decision. There could be valid security reasons to redact the report.
I can not vote in the poll because there is no appropriate choice. Of course, I want the report made public but only the parts that can legally be shared. The entire report, by law, can not be made public.
Release the report. Naturally it would be only a legal release to assume otherwise ? IMO this has the potential to make Watergate a non story.
It can’t be released in its entirety, the law has protections. You haven’t given enough choices in the poll
A poorly written question!
Release what is legal to release and let the democrats suffer about who will be locked in jail. Go for it Attorney General Barr.
We should be able to see as much as law allows!
C’mon AMAC. This isn’t an all or nothing report. AG Barr CANNOT release verbatim the report in its entirety as per LAW. I want what can legally be released, which AG Barr has said he will do. I’m positive there will be enough there to sink many a Democrat’s, and their flunkies, ship, that will be released. It’s time to get this country the rest of the way back on track. MAGA President Trump!
I think the report should be released to the PUBLIC before Congress (following the legal guidelines). We are very capable of making our own decisions without Congress spin
The report should be made public with the redaction’s in place.
The President said before the report was released that he did a mind if it was made public so take him at his word.
I would like to see it made public. As long as it is done legally according to the law.
I think the issue is about the report being redacted vs. not being redacted. There was no option to select “choose to release redacted report publicly.”
I voted for the public release but I think that all info. Should not be released. Under the law for security reasons there are parts that should not be told, grand jury info and names are not to be released. I should have voted Not to release because of the wording.
We the people have paid out over 25 million dollars for it. We deserve to see what we paid for.
The public paid millions of dollars for this report. It should be made public and the lies should be exposed and prosecuted.
It doesn’t matter whether it is released or not. The Democrats will interpret it the way they want to spin it. They wouldn’t recognize truth if it slapped them in the face.
Laws are made for a good reason. The report should be released accordingly. Libs keep bringing up the Starr report on Clinton and that it was released in its entirety. Well it was because the law was different back then. A 1978 statute which allowed the entire investigation to be released expired in 1999, included investigations of people who didn’t break any law but reading the report casts a negative impression on them. The 1999 statute eliminated the allowing of the entire report to eliminate this and included giving the Attorney General more power to decide how much of the final report of the investigation would be released to the public, if anything.
The public paid millions of dollars for this report. It should be made public and the liars should be prosecuted and jailed.
How about make the ken star report public. The democrats are running scared because they are guilty of crimes and attack the President on a daily basis. It will be interesting to find out the real truth. I hope that Barr actually conducts a thorough investigation,im thinking Obama will be right at the top of the heap.
After appropriate redactions, yes, it should be released. The democrats will not be able to spin the results if the public is aware of the conclusions!
The issue has been investigated, the experts charged with analyzing and judging have done their job. I trust that these people are competent and do not need to be scrutinized by partisan public opinion. We all have the right to disagree, but to question these individuals’ integrity truly undermines everything on which American democracy was founded.
No. The AG must follow the law. If this one is revealed then we must go back through history and reveal all of them. And what would that accomplish? The brain trust of DC would have something else to waste time on and screw up.
I’m not an attorney, however, I know there are solid legal reasons why an unredacted report can’t be released. If the report is edited to protect innocent individuals mentioned in the report and for the other proper legal reasons, why not release the report? Presently, this is nothing but something for the Dems to grab onto since the enormous time and energy wasted by Mueller produced zip, nada, nothing!
If they release it; then Dems will find out, & my beloved Trump will be impeached.
What Demoncratic Socialist wrote this question? It is poorly written and can not be accurately answered.
We needed a third option to release that which can legally be released.
Poll questions are poorly chosen. Where’s the question asking for a redaction of grand jury testimony?
It doesn’t matter which option is chosen in the end. This entire effort has been so contentious from all aspects. If there’s the slightest hint of any impropriety, the Democrats will continue to use any and all aspects of the report to attack President Trump. The Republicans will distort the findings that will also continue the debate. If it’s not made public, doubt will forever remain. Until there’s an equivalent special prosecutor assigned to investigate the wrongdoings of the left, the right will cry foul. This entire costly investigation is not about justice. It’s an exposé on the corruption in our American government. There is absolutely no acceptable resolution that will satisfy all of the parties involved. Sad state of politics in the US.
I agree parts should be released but I’m sure all can’t be. They have to protect individuals who have testified and any classified information.
I do not believe its release will have a damaging effect on our relations with the British Government.
If that be the case then we would have long ago become a clanging symbol and not a bell of freedom to liberty which we claim to be.
What took place at the highest eschelons of our Federal Government, while not totally understood by most Americans, will continue into the future.
We would be a lesser Nation and not deserving of the esteem some in the world now grant us.
I think anything that is legal should be made public. Whatever is not, should remain private. We need to start enforcing our laws. They are out there for a reason.
No redacted information should be made public
Define “in it’s entirety”……If that means it should be released WITH the redactions required under the law, then YES, release it. The law must be adhered to, period.
Your Poll questions are incomplete, there should be one more question, “Yes, it should be released publicly in accordance with the law?”
I don’t like this “all or nothing choice.” I am sure there are things in the report which could compromise national security or of a personal nature.