AMAC in the Media

AMAC Joins Coalition to Oppose United Nations Energy Treaty Amendment

Posted on Thursday, May 5, 2022
AMAC Action

The Kigali Amendment places limits on future production of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). These HFCs are used by millions of large and small American businesses. Repair/replacement costs for business, home, and vehicle air conditioners with non-HFC refrigerants will be significantly costlier and stands to hit seniors living on fixed incomes the hardest.


May 3, 2022

United States Senate
United States Capitol
Washington, DC 20510

Re: Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer

Dear Senator:

The undersigned organizations strongly urge you to vote against ratification of the Kigali
Amendment to the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer (Kigali
Amendment). This United Nations treaty provision would impose costly restrictions on the
American people and serve as a consumer tax on air conditioning and refrigeration. It would also
give an unfair advantage to China and other industrial competitors of the United States.

The Kigali Amendment places limits on future production of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) on the
grounds that they contribute to climate change, though the Environmental Protection Agency
estimates they represent only 3 percent of current greenhouse gas emissions. HFCs are the class
of refrigerants used in hundreds of millions of American home and vehicle air conditioners as
well as home refrigerators. They are also used by millions of American businesses both large and
small, from the refrigerators and freezers in restaurant kitchens to the industrial process
refrigeration systems used by manufacturers.

Repair costs for this equipment, particularly replacing refrigerant lost from a leak, will rise as
supplies of HFCs dwindle and prices rise. New air conditioning and refrigeration systems will
also become more expensive as they will have to be redesigned to use one of the non-HFC
refrigerants, many of which are significantly costlier than HFCs. Low-income households,
including seniors on fixed incomes, stand to be hardest hit by the cost increases. In addition,
some of the alternative refrigerants are classified as flammable and thus raise safety concerns.

In December of 2020, Congress passed domestic limits on HFCs, called the American
Innovation and Manufacturing Act (AIM Act), as part of the massive Consolidated
Appropriations Act, and the Environmental Protection Agency began implementing them on
January 1, 2022. These provisions, inserted without debate before the full Senate, were actively
supported by the makers of HFC-substitute refrigerants and equipment. In contrast, most
American consumers and businesses who rely on existing HFC-dependent systems had no idea
what was being proposed nor the impact it will have on them. The air conditioning/refrigeration
sector is the only beneficiary of HFC restrictions, and they gain at the expense of their customers
that use this equipment.

Even Senators who supported these domestic HFC restrictions should oppose ratification of the
Kigali Amendment because doing so would cede Congressional authority over HFC policy to the
United Nations. As it is, Congress could consider modifications to the law if implementation
costs prove high (prices for some HFCs have already quadrupled since the AIM Act was passed)
or if unanticipated problems arise, but adopting any such relief measures would be much more
difficult if the United Nations is placed in charge.

We are entering the first air conditioning season under the AIM Act, after which we will know a
great deal more about the actual cost impacts of these HFC restrictions. It seems particularly
foolish to rush into ratification of the Kigali Amendment beforehand.

Make no mistake – when it comes to United Nations environmental treaties, it is never a question
of whether America gets the short end of the stick, it is only a question of how. The Kigali
Amendment is no exception. Our global competitors see it as a way to gain an advantage, and
developing nations see it as a rationale for additional aid. China sees it as both.

China is classified as a developing nation under the Kigali Amendment, which allows it to
benefit from highly favorable treatment as compared to the U.S. and other developed
nations. Developing nations were granted an extra decade to phase down their HFC production,
so China will still have plentiful supplies for domestic use long after the U.S. Also, China and
other developing nations will be eligible for financial assistance from the United Nations through
a special multilateral fund set up under the Montreal Protocol and applicable to the Kigali
Amendment. The U.S. is the single largest contributor to that fund.

Thus, under the Kigali Amendment China gets the best of all worlds – it can continue mass
producing and using cheaper HFCs domestically for years after supplies begin to dry up in the
U.S., including their use in industrial processes that give it an unfair advantage over American
competitors. At the same time, China will be receiving millions of dollars in financial assistance
from the U.S. and other developed nations to help it comply with the Kigali Amendment.

The most sensible course of action for the Senate is not to entangle the U.S in another costly and
unfair United Nations mandate. Instead, you should focus on oversight of the domestic HFC
provisions and consider remedies to emerging problems with them.

We again urge you to preserve America’s sovereign authority and vote against ratification of the
Kigali Amendment. If you have any questions, please contact Ben Lieberman of the Competitive
Enterprise Institute at [email protected]. Thank you.


Bob Carlstrom
AMAC Action

Share this article:
Notify of
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1 year ago

We need to get OUT of the U.N.

1 year ago

We need much more freedom as a people. Not more regulation. Stop the deep state stand for yourself. If an idea is good use it if not reject it. Think for yourself stop letting other think for you.

Michael Proctor
Michael Proctor
1 year ago

The U.N. (formerly The League of Nations) has always tried to rule over all. It was a ad idea as The League of Nations, and it is in my opinion, even more dangerous as the U.N.. Giving up our sovereignty to become a vassal of a authority that wishes to rule over all, is a very bad idea for us
and our rights! I.M.H.O.

2 years ago

Our sovereignty with regard to health matters is about to ceded to the WHO at the upcoming meeting May 22 in Geneva. This is a grave matter that presents a Clear and Present Danger to all Americans. Please try to stop this!!!

Biden submitted amendments:

Mark L
Mark L
2 years ago

Ridiculous! How many States implemented and enforced Auto Emissions? It’s an absolute joke! Emissions Stations are all over the State now and from what I can tell the State should have just charged everyone $20 to own a car or gasoline aspirated engine
altogether! It’s a joke!
The changing of Refrigerants that may have depleted the ozone are pretty much gone or you pay a fortune for services. I’ve said it before I’ll say it again, anything the government touches goes to crap!
Regulations are detrimental to OUR Country!

Ted Atwood
Ted Atwood
2 years ago

You are making a mistake, the Kigali Amendment makes America more competitive, and the proof is in the newer technology that costs less to support than the last-gen technology. For instance, people can retrofit from R-22 directly to R-449A, where only the refrigerant needs to be replaced rather than the entire unit. In the previous generation, the only option was to replace the R-22 units with 410A units, which required all new hardware and new refrigerant.

Letts Brandon
Letts Brandon
2 years ago

We should be withdrawing from all participation in the UN not turning over more control of our country to foreign powers who hate us!

2 years ago

Defund the entire UN

R.Thomas Guth
R.Thomas Guth
2 years ago

I suggest we go a step further and withdraw from the UN.

2 years ago

What is the origin of the proposed new refrigerants? I believe some are petroleum products

2 years ago

What is the origin of the proposed new refrigerants? I believe some are petroleum products

Join or Renew Today!

Save up to 25% by purchasing multi-year memberships! All Membership packages include your spouse for FREE!
5-Year Membership


3-Year Membership


1-Year Membership


Lifetime Membership


You can also print and mail your membership application. Download the application
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x