AMAC Exclusive – By Andrew Abbott
In March 2020, experts and academics predicted that the worsening COVID-19 pandemic would lead to a massive “real estate tailspin.” Instead, it kicked off one of America’s hottest real estate markets ever. But while conventional wisdom held that the trend was a result of stimulus checks and historically low interest rates, a new congressional report suggests another cause: some of the world’s largest investment firms are buying up single family homes as fast as they can manage, threatening to turn America into a nation of renters.
According to the report, which was released by the U.S. House Committee on Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations on June 28, a significant number of single-family home purchases over the past two years were made by large investment firms, not individual homebuyers. By analyzing a handful of key housing markets, the House Subcommittee found that large companies have been buying up vast numbers of houses at an unusual rate. For example, in the third quarter of 2021 alone, “institutional investors bought 42.8% of homes for sale in the Atlanta metro area and 38.8% of homes in the Phoenix-Glendale-Scottsdale area,” according to the report.
Unsurprisingly, the median sale price for a single-family home in the first quarter of 2022 has shot up nearly 25% from the first quarter of 2020, going from $329,000 to nearly $430,000.
This development is an unwelcome one for prospective homebuyers, as these firms – which include private equity giants like BlackRock and Invitation Homes, a $21-billion spin-off of Blackstone – don’t intend to resell the homes on the open market. Instead, they hope to turn them into single-family rental properties, or “Securitized SFRs.” The companies then hold the properties for rentals and long-term investments. With so many houses being bought, these companies would likely be able to set rental rates for entire housing markets – and are already doing so in some areas, often increasing rental rates by more than 10% each year. At the same time, a restricted supply of homes on the market is causing prices to increase even further, forcing would-be first-time homebuyers out of buying entirely and back into renting.
This business strategy goes back to the financial crisis of 2008. As the congressional report details, following the crash and subsequent collapse of the housing market, corporations backed by large investment firms began snapping up homes that had massively depreciated in value, often taking advantage of the financially distressed situation of homeowners. This effort was aided by the federal government, both through “bulk sales of distressed federally-backed mortgages and foreclosed properties” and “providing Fannie Mae-backed financing.” In other words, the federal government loaned money and sold packages of foreclosed homes to these investment banks, enabling them to become major players in the real estate market – a trend that accelerated more slowly at first, and then rapidly during the pandemic.
The unsettling irony here is that it was these large investment firms and the federal government that caused the housing crisis to begin with. Leading up to 2008, these firms pressured banks to offer sub-prime mortgages to Americans who could not afford them. The mortgages were then bundled and sold as investment products for a significant profit. When buyers defaulted and the market collapsed, it triggered one of the most significant economic crises since the Great Depression. In response, the Bush and Obama administrations bailed out the banks – leaving millions of ordinary Americans to suffer.
In 2001, no single investor owned more than 1,000 homes. While the report does not reveal how many homes these institutions currently own, it does reveal that, from March 2018 to September 2021 alone, five institutional investor-backed companies purchased 76,235 single-family homes. The recent increase was likely due to the historically low mortgage rates offered during the pandemic, which benefitted corporations as much as individuals. In the last two years, many hopeful homebuyers found themselves outbid by these investors, who could afford to offer cash up front and were willing to close immediately. Of the investor-acquired homes the subcommittee analyzed, they found that the new property owners would immediately raise rents on tenants by almost double, despite “a diminished quality of housing over time.”
Homeownership has long been one of the most reliable ways to build generational wealth for families. With these new barriers, many families may now be forced to seek other options. The report offers no clear solutions on how to solve the problem – perhaps unsurprising given that government meddling largely caused it to begin with. But as this crisis continues to worsen, our leaders must find some way to address it, lest the American Dream slip further out of reach for millions.
Andrew Abbott is the pen name of a writer and public affairs consultant with over a decade of experience in DC at the intersection of politics and culture.
AGENDA 21, and AGENDA 30 are all you need to understand.
I own a 3 bedroom, single family home in the Scottsdale, AZ area, and I am constantly getting calls from institutional homebuyers who are offering me higher than market prices with no inspection. Although my house is worth almost 40% more than I paid for it 4 years ago, I refuse to sell to these con-artists. Besides, If I were to sell, where am I going to live? Home purchase prices are ridiculously inflated, and I don’t want to throw my money away by renting.
More anti-Wall Street screeds from the Association of Mature American Communists!
Although it’s not common some home sellers are not willing to sell to those big companies. It’s not easy to turn down $20K but if you’re getting $430K instead of $450 for a house you bought for $220K some people are willing to say no and sell to a family for a little less. My neighbor did this. They moved because they didn’t need a 4-bedroom two story house for the 2 of them anymore. They didn’t need the taxes or upkeep. They’re on a fixed income and I’m sure that $20K wasn’t easy to turn down to keep our housing area truly residential. But they did, because they saw what happened at the neighboring gated housing area. Renting isn’t the same as owning. And the owners of rental property believe less upkeep is better for them. So, the area goes downhill rather quickly from middle class to lower class as PaulE pointed out. And Homeowners Associations cannot stop this movement. We’ve lived here 20 years, it’s an upper middle-class area. But it would only take a few houses not maintaining the appearance to start the slide into lower class.
After they get a large block of single family homes, they will be on a position to pressure changes to local zoning so they can tear them down and build multi-family units.Just a step by progressives to eliminate propert ownership. Who was it that said recently that people won’t own anything, they’ll rent and be happy.
Fundamental tenet, criminals cannot be allowed to benefit from their crimes!
With home buying out of reach, rent going up, how long will it be before families can no longer afford any housing? Inflation and proposed tax increases could cause a homeless boom on American families in the middle class! Tent cities cropping up all over? Third world status for average folks? All because Democrats hunger for power and have no leadership skills and a hatred for everyone they think is beneath them! That’s Marxism and this great reset elitist have for the serfs! God have mercy on all of us!
Thomas Jefferson is credited with saying: “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered”
The author should have wrote this article 3 or 4 years ago, when large investment firms first started buying up large swaths of single family homes in desireable areas of the country. To say the author is late to the party would be a huge understatement. Now with rising interest rates becoming a a rising expense factor, the buying trend is decreasing substantially at all these firms.
On the positive side, these firms have already locked up a sufficient percentage of the desired housing inventory they need to provide for a steady, double digit income stream to ensure their annual returns will prove quite profitable in both the short term and long term. Remember, these firms did NOT buy in the inner cities or low income sector of the housing market. These firms don’t want that sort of renter, which costs them more than they can make on an monthly basis. They want renters who will respect the property they rent in areas of the country with rising market values. They bought strictly in solid middle class and up-scale sectors of the market.
This scheme is causing a housing shortage and higher purchasing cost of houses? Supply and demand right? Maybe this scheme will backfire on BlackRock? I suppose if a homeowner is looking to sell and then downsize and/or move to a state with less cost of living, this might be a benefit for those people, but not for people who want the dream of home ownership. Interesting article.
They are not just buying the houses they are going to convert the variance on the property from a single family property to a multiple unit property and hence create “more rental housing “, using the excuse umbrella than there’s a need for “affordable housing “. I don’t call it a affordable housing solution for several reasons. One, changing the variance for the property doesn’t change anything else about the underlying issues that are there—utilities, water and sewer connections, which are not upgraded by a property variance to accommodate, hence passing on this problem. Two, it affects the property values of the surrounding properties by lowering their value substantially. Three—there’s no concern for anyone but making more money and creating a monopoly by pretending to solve the housing crisis. None of these properties will be maintained past being built, creating a worse housing problem issue so they can come back and tear them down and rebuild and raise the rent—a never ending cycle—while they get richer.