Politics

White House Rolls Out New Rules To End ‘Birth Tourism’

pregnant pro-life promote birth tourismThe Trump administration will implement new rules that aim to prevent pregnant foreign nationals from visiting the U.S. for the sole purpose of giving birth on U.S. soil, a practice widely referred to as “birth tourism.”

The White House announced new rules Thursday meant to crack down on birth tourism, where foreign pregnant women enter the U.S. on a tourist visa in order to give birth, giving their child automatic citizenship. Under the upcoming guidelines, pregnant women applying for B visas — otherwise known as nonimmigrant visitor visas — may have to prove that they have a specific purpose for traveling to the U.S. other than giving birth.

“[T]he State Department will no longer issue temporary visitor (B-1/B-2) visas to aliens seeking to enter the United States for ‘birth tourism’ – the practice of traveling to the United States to secure automatic and permanent American citizenship for their children by giving birth on American soil,” White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said in a statement Thursday.

“This rule change is necessary to enhance public safety, national security, and the integrity of our immigration system,” Grisham continued. She also noted that the rule change will go into effect Friday.

U.S. officials will not automatically ask every female visa applicant if they are pregnant or intend to become pregnant, but they will be questioned about the subject if officials are led to believe that their only reason for entering the U.S. is to give birth.

Under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, anyone born on U.S. soil is given automatic citizenship, a concept known as birthright citizenship. While the practice has been tolerated, the U.S. government has historically blocked those that are deemed unable to cover costs for their births.

The State Department does not publish information on the exact number of people who visit the U.S. in order to give birth, making it difficult to pinpoint the exact figure, but the Center for Immigration Studies estimated that 33,000 births take place a year by those on tourist visas.

Many foreign nationals are willing to pay big money to give birth in the U.S. in order to reap the benefits of having a child with American citizenship. One Chinese national, who pleaded guilty in 2019 to running a birth tourism scheme, raked in $3 million in wire transfers from wealthy clients who were coached on how to get past Customs and Border Protection (CBP) airport screenings.

President Donald Trump, who has made immigration enforcement a top priory in his administration, has long complained about birthright citizenship and confirmed in 2019 that he was “very seriously” looking at ending it. The new rule pushed Thursday is the biggest step the White House has taken to curb birth tourism.

“The birth tourism industry threatens to overburden valuable hospital resources and is rife with criminal activity, as reflected in Federal prosecutions. Closing this glaring immigration loophole will combat these endemic abuses and ultimately protect the United States from the national security risks created by this practice,” Grisham said.

Reprinted with permission from - Conservative Daily News - by Jason Hopkins

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Sign Up Today
Read more articles by Outside Contributor

3
Leave a Reply

3 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Peter

Think of the reckless endangerment these children must endure at the hands of such ruthlessly opportunistic parents.. And I’m sure none of the parents explain to the children why they are emotionally disturbed from birth.. Horrendous.

Peter

“Birthright citizenship” is totally opportunistic and must be abolished. These children are ultimately human shields for their parents playing psychological war games for profits.. in investment and purchasing scams… It’s a gross injustice to the children that live a life of persecution… and have no one to turn to. Quite naturally they will blame the USA for letting their parents self-indulgence go unchecked.

LTC S

This is a no win situation for the USA. Where as I think the concept has merit, I only see limited ways possible that it can be enforced. If a woman shows up to the ER in labor, they’re not going to be turned away. And they will get a certificate of birth unless the medical facility withholds the birth certificate until a declared parent presents proof of being a USA citizen. Without proof of USA citizenship the child will have the citizenship of the declared mother or father. If neither are USA citizens the child will be a citizen of who is taking custody of the child. If only the mother is present the child will have the citizenship of the mother. It’s a no win situation at best but is enforceable.