The Tax Reform Moment?

by John Hayward – Rupert Murdoch took some heat for observing on Twitter, “Growing IRS scandal makes perfect case for flat tax and abolition all deductions.  Nothing could be fairer and abuse free.”

Several responses took Murdoch to task because the abusive treatment of certain groups applying for tax-exempt status, based on their politics, doesn’t have any direct relationship with the progressive income tax system, or plans to replace it.

But if I might be a bit more charitable to Murdoch, I think he was trying to make the broader case that a Flat Tax system would greatly reduce the size and power of the IRS.  If his suggestion is taken literally, and all deductions are abolished, it follows that no one would be applying for any sort of tax-exempt status at all.  One of the complaints raised by the groups targeted in the IRS scandal is that it put them at a competitive disadvantage against liberal groups, which sailed right through the Tax Exempt Organizations unit and secured approval in a matter of weeks – even when they were actually violating tax law at the time, as in the case of the Barack H. Obama Foundation, run by the President’s half-brother.  This isn’t just a scandal about those who were given a hard time; it’s also about those who weren’t.

Take all of this power and discretion away from the IRS, reduce it to processing a massive pile of postcard-sized tax returns every quarter, and you won’t have any more scandals like the one currently gripping Washington.  You also won’t have as many opportunities for politicians to control our behavior or reward favored constituencies by modifying the tax code in countless non-scandalous, but nonetheless corrupt ways.

The tax system really should be the fairest, flattest, most efficient method of funding the government, dispersing the burden as evenly and widely as possible.  It shouldn’t provide new, surreptitious methods for the government to exercise power over us.  And the tax burden should be clearly understood by every American, not hidden with quick-and-painless paycheck deductions everyone forgets about, or concealed behind impenetrable layers of pass-through corporate taxation.  No citizen of the United States fully understands his tax burden at the moment, and of course the government feels no compulsion to limit its spending to anywhere near the amount of revenue it takes in.

If we don’t understand these vital attributes of government, how can we truly exercise our electoral freedom by casting fully informed votes?  Our political rhetoric is filled with talk of “choice.”  Choice is only meaningful in the presence of accurate information about costs, benefits, and consequences.  That’s why business entities can be sued for fraud – when they lie to attract customers, those customers are not freely choosing to engage in commerce with them.  There are no more thoroughly defrauded “customers” on Earth than U.S. taxpayers, who actually were referred to as customers by Acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller during House Ways and Means Committee  hearings last Friday.

The Fair Tax, which would shift the burden of taxation to a national sales tax, would also strip Washington of powers that invite political abuse.  Politicians love to play a little game where they introduce new taxes by claiming they’ll only apply to a few ultra-rich people, but they end up affecting nearly everyone.  The Alternative Minimum Tax was sold this way – it was only supposed to hit one hundred and fifty-five super-wealthy individuals when it was introduced in the late 1960s, but now it slams into more than 30 million people per year.  The income tax itself was originally presented as a very modest surtax on the richest Americans.

Once a new tax is firmly in place, the rules change, and suddenly everyone is getting soaked… and then a growing constituency at the bottom is inexorably removed from the tax rolls, becoming a reliable constituency for Big Government benefits they don’t see themselves having to pay for.  They’re not entirely correct in that belief, because they still end up paying a lot of hidden taxes, but they see themselves as “free riders.”

There would be no way to play such a game with the Fair Tax, or the kind of simple Flat Tax Rupert Murdoch endorsed, because cranking up the tax rates would affect just about everyone.  A standard deduction would leave a fairly small group without skin in the Flat Tax game, but the resistance to rate increases from the far larger population that did pay them – by writing a check to the IRS every quarter – would be formidable.  Almost the entire populace would be very skeptical of Fair Tax rate increases, which they would pay every time they made a purchase.

Both Flat and Fair Tax systems could be corrupted, much as the relatively simple income tax imposed on our great-grandparents was twisted into the smoke-filled labyrinth of shadows and pitfalls we currently navigate.  Special exemptions could be introduced, a flat system with only one or two rates could be made more “progressive,” special Fair Tax rates could be created for certain goods favored or disdained by the political class… there are lots of ways any system could go wrong.

But maybe the current atmosphere of scandal and abuse surrounding the IRS will help Americans realize they’re currently living in just about the worst of all possible worlds, short of collectivist horror shows like communism.  Almost everyone reading this is technically a “tax criminal,” in violation of some obscure requirement.  Expensive professional assistance is necessary for even the most well-meaning business owner to comply with the law, and even the IRS itself gets tax questions wrong with frightening regularity.  A great deal of our behavior is conducted – or abandoned – in fear of the tax code.  Bad investments are made to take advantage of its loopholes, while good money is sheltered instead of finding productive opportunities.

And now we’re facing the ugly realization that our political discourse – held in reverence by most Americans, at every point on the political spectrum – has been corrupted by the IRS.  We should not hesitate to bring the miscreants to justice, no matter what office they hold, but we should also do some hard thinking about the offices themselves.

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Denise Baker
9 years ago

The scandal and arrogance from the IRS should encourage all conservative and religious people to take a stand for dissolving this corrupt organization. Now is the time for the the Fair or Flat Tax to be implemented. The government wants Americans to have confidence in this left leaning. biased, lying, arrogant corrupt organization to enforce Obamacare?
If we do not lobby for removing the IRS from our lives than we our sealing our own demise.

9 years ago

The bottom line to my last comment is that either a flat or fair tax is an acceptable alternative to our current income tax code, if and only if, the effective tax rates are clearly spelled out in the law itself. Otherwise there is nothing stopping politicians in the future from increasing the tax rates via either simple majorities or super majorities of both houses of Congress. The goal should be to force the federal government to live within its means, by strictly controlling how much it has to spend. If the federal government cannot extract more money from its citizens, then it will be forced to eliminate programs and agencies that are unnecessary or ineffective. It is up to us, the people who send our representatives to Washington, to tell which programs and agencies to cut. They clearly cannot be trusted to do this on their own.

By the way as part of any tax reform proposal, the federal government should be forced to go back to 2007 spending levels. This nonsense of running trillion dollar deficits each year, because Obama jacked up spending through the roof, has got to stop.

9 years ago

The federal income tax, when originally proposed by the Progressive (Socialist) Woodrow Wilson, was supposed to be limited to very high income individuals (think much of the same criteria as the AMT was used to sell the public on the idea) and had a top rate of 7 percent for incomes of $500,000 or more. That’s approximately $11 million in today’s dollars. The income tax wasn’t even supposed to kick in until you made an income of $20,000, which is the equivalent of approximately $450,000 today. So 99 percent of the population was exempt from the federal income tax.

Well it only took a couple of years for the Progressives to lower the income threshold to ensnare more and more of the public and also raise the effective tax rates to extract more money from the private sector. With that, the size of the federal government began exploding. Now the Progressive movement had the financial means to begin the slow but steady expansion of government powers into more and more areas of the economy.

With the elections of Hoover and FDR, both strong believers in the Progressive movement, the movement leveraged the Great Depression to create all manner of new programs and agencies under the guise of “social welfare” and “economic improvement”. Government was involved in almost all facets of the economy with everything from wage and price controls to quotas on crops. To progressives, it was a glorious time. They were in charge and applying their programs and micro-managing everything. For everyone else, it was more than a decade of hell. The nation’s economy was stagnant for over a decade and unemployment got as high as 25 percent.

Now we have another progressive in charge and he wants to repeat many of the mistakes of the past. All in the name of transforming America. The argument to why this won’t be a massive failure being “it will be different this time”. Sure. Not only do we risk taking down our own economy, but much of the civilized world with us. I guess that’s technically “different”.

Bob Soucy
9 years ago


Would love your thoughts, please comment.x