Chat with us, powered by LiveChat
Politics

The State of the Union and the ‘Resistance’

Trump state of the union resistance

Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead

President Trump delivered an outstanding State of the Union address on Feb. 5. And, although he opened his speech with hopes “that we will govern not as two parties, but as one nation” and laid out plans for “the agenda of the American people,” the reactions of Democrats during and after the speech raise questions about their commitment to working toward policy solutions.

The obvious contempt held by the current opposition party crosses traditional lines of disapproval and borders on un-American.

Democrats didn’t clap for calls to make the middle class stronger. They seemed upset that we’ve added 5.3 million new jobs and 600,000 manufacturing jobs. They looked agitated when the president said “nearly 5 million Americans have been lifted off food stamps.”

Upon recognition of low unemployment for minorities, Democrats didn’t stand, and didn’t clap. They even looked angry over tax cuts and the doubling of the child tax credit that helped average, everyday Americans.

Few on the left clapped in recognition of the United State’s energy independence, and none on deregulation. Democrat darling Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) wouldn’t even clap for putting sex traffickers behind bars.

So, how does the president run a country when a majority of the House has differences that are not about solving problems and governance, but rather about the core of what the United States is and should be?

Partisan politics has reached such extreme polarization that the optics of Democrats acknowledging clear wins for the country are seen as a hindrance to upcoming 2020 election runs. That’s a major problem. We should all be able to celebrate in U.S. successes—unless your policy goals run counter to success.

Maybe that’s the real issue, since the president has taken on issues that are often thought to be platforms that Democrats run on, like criminal justice reform, prescription drug prices, and fighting for the working class.

President Trump asked for unity. But his calls to “re-ignite the American imagination” and to “choose greatness” weren’t met with shared hope, but bellicose rhetoric from the opposition party.

Response

The Democrat’s response to the speech was delivered by Stacey Abrams, Georgia’s gubernatorial candidate in the 2018 midterm elections. Abrams, described by ABC News as the “first African-American woman to be nominated for governor by a major political party and the first woman to lead a party in the Georgia Statehouse,” chose to ignore everything in the State of the Union address and instead rehash tired, false allegations of racism and voter suppression in her own failed bid for governor.

Complete with a cornucopia of intersectional cohorts standing behind her like a mass choir, her carefully staged speech was less of a rebuttal and more like a launch for a 2020 Senate bid.

Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), responded to the speech on Twitter by calling the President a liar, saying “it will take days to fact-check all the misrepresentations that [President Trump] made during” the State of the Union address.

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) suggested the president wasn’t a leader, and said openly on Twitter that he was “political, divisive, and at times even nasty,” which clearly isn’t how the rest of the United States viewed his speech, given CBS News showed a 76 percent approval rating for the State of the Union address.

That rating was actually similar to last year’s rating of 75 percent. And a repeat of that statistic shows that three-quarters of the country approves of President Trump’s message when it’s not filtered by liberal media activists who pretend to be journalists and political partisans who distort and mischaracterize his message. It’s a signal that he actually does resonate with the majority of America.

It also explains the vitriol and ceaseless character attacks against the president, because, when he’s not constantly attacked, he’s rather popular and his ideas work.

But, when politicians hate someone who is living up to his campaign promises, enforcing U.S. law, leading in human trafficking arrests, making gains on criminal justice reform, creating millions of new jobs, correcting trade imbalances, removing us from foreign entanglements, and so many more great things, it becomes necessary to ask ourselves if the “resistance” is actually working for America or against it.

Reprinted with permission from - The Epoch Times - by Adrian Norman

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Sign Up Today
Read more articles by Outside Contributor

4
Leave a Reply

2 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
PaulE

Another auricle where the author acts stunned or surprised that the Democrat Party’s views and objectives don’t align with traditional American values, laws and culture. That they in fact run counter to virtually every single major cornerstone of our Constitutional republic and the foundational principles this nation was created upon. Where has the author been living for decades? In a cave or some remote mountain top cut off from all contact with the outside world? The Democrat Party and its policies has been moving solidly left for a long, long time and they have been dragging the country incrementally leftward with it with each succeeding generation. That they now no longer feel the need to pretend to be “moderates”, “liberals” or even “progressives” (a term American socialists coined in the early 20th century to hide who they really were) and are now openly advocating infanticide, open borders, the end of… Read more »

elizabeth

he’s a traitorous criminal as is his entire family. he’s leading us to war just to deflect from an investigation that will surely expose him.