Advocacy / AMAC Action On Capitol Hill / Opinion / Politics

Seize the Moment, Strengthen Social Security

social security cards“Coincidence of interest” is a marvelous thing. Two people or two groups that may never agree, suddenly find themselves at an intersection, and concur that the way ahead lies in the same direction. That is what solutions often boil down to. And we have such a moment right now — to preserve and strengthen Social Security. There is an instruction in Latin for such moments: Carpe Diem, “Seize the Day!”

What did I say, a chance to strengthen Social Security? Yes, bear with me. Before any of the current and future presidential candidates offer their ideas on preserving Social Security in detail, there may be a solution that has teed itself up in Congress. It is part accident, part fear of sequestration, part mutual understanding of unspoken realities, and part good luck — and a call for leadership in 2015. Seeing the solution before us is halfway to getting the job done. The other half is working together, and doing it.

Recently, the Republican House and Senate approved a budget that envisions deep cuts in federal spending ahead. Good in theory, the budget looks to be a hard slog. Already, appropriators in both parties are seeking to soften the blow with competing ideas. The tight multi-year budget plan is driven by genuine fiscal conservatism, and also by a latent fear of another “sequester,” or across-the-board Federal cut, that will otherwise kick in next October. Since this would produce another big national fight, complete with possible shutdowns and recriminations, the idea of finding “a better way” is afoot.

Irony of ironies, there seems to be accidental agreement also emerging. Defense hawks feel the defense budget needs to be increased to match current international threats, and propose to do so by cutting parts of vast Federal entitlement programs. At the same time, some Democrats say that any increase in defense spending must be matched by increases in discretionary spending on non-defense programs — savings that they admit, in part, must come from “offsets” in Federal entitlements. This is a remarkable, but also opportune moment.

Why? Because there may be a way to clean up waste in Federal entitlements, while also stabilizing the Social Security system and not raising taxes. In short, into this void — or unexpected opportunity — may slip a solution that is waiting for inclusion in the final appropriations deal of 2015. This solution is a “hybrid” legislative proposal, tied to strengthening the Social Security system with what has been described as a “Social Security Guarantee.”

AMAC, the Association of Mature American Citizens, is the chief advocate for this Guarantee and is one of the outside groups leading the charge to save and strengthen Social Security. We suggest balancing the equities of fiscal hawks and “the every American,” who understands that the “full faith and credit” of the promises we make to our seniors are now and always inviolate. In short, older Americans who need us must not be in doubt that they are always covered.

So, what is this “Social Security Guarantee” plan (SSG)? First and foremost, it’s a plan designed to help working Americans save and invest more of their own money so that they are less dependent on Social Security in the long run. By offering an Early Retirement Account (ERA), the plan gives every American access to a free-market savings account and a way to begin saving for retirement, from the earliest age. All workers would own their ERA, making it portable if an employee changes jobs, and contributions to the account from the worker and employer would be voluntary.

Creation of the ERA is especially critical today because fully half of America’s employees do not have a 401k or a pension plan. Unlike a traditional pension, however, workers would not be able to access their ERA funds until age 62 — making it a true lockbox for retirement and safety net for all. To preserve both safety and a healthy return, fifty percent of funds may be invested in guaranteed interest accounts or annuities, and the rest in government-approved investments, including the S&P 500 Index. The concept is proven, voluntary, compensatory, popular, and will play a vital role in strengthening Social Security and the confidence of seniors, as we all move into and through “senior-hood.”

In addition to giving workers access to a new retirement account, AMAC’s plan enables Social Security to be there for those who truly need it. At a time when the program is facing serious solvency issues, the SSG offers clear, incontrovertible survival for the guaranteed system, going out for 80 years from 2015, without raising taxes — full stop. Second, it preserves the basic Social Security compact with every American, including cost of living (COLA) increases.

How? To make COLAs viable, they are calculated in a way that protects survivability, in high and low inflation years, for all incomes. Specifically, COLA amounts are dependent on household income, with beneficiaries with less than $20,000 receiving a COLA with a three percent minimum and four percent maximum, while those over $50,000 managing a COLA range set between one and two percent. The point is that COLAs are preserved, made modestly scalable, and the upshot is preservation of a key element of the system.

Likewise, consider the modest age variant, in part reflecting the reality that people are everywhere working longer and living longer by God’s grace, America’s unrivaled standards of living, and advanced medical care. The reality supports another modest variation, retirement age, to both “grandfather” all now entitled to benefits, and protect those who have a longer lifetime of benefits coming. For example, by placing early retirement at 62 to 64, full from 66 to 69, phasing all shifts in over a multi-year period, we get to sustain the system for our children, and for their children — rather than blithely racing to spend their money.

We, the country’s seniors, are then both equitable and responsible, fair and good managers — honest and compassionate fiduciaries — of the future. And here is a real surprise: In a recent, nationwide poll of AMAC membership, more than a million seniors, results overwhelmingly favored this exact approach.

In short, any workable system for preserving the greatness of our nation’s security guarantee for all Americans has to contain some essential pieces. Imagine that you are baking a loaf of bread. No wheat, butter, salt, milk, and yeast, no bread. The right proportions of each, and you have lasting satisfaction. Missing a key element and the process does not bake.

So now we must ask ourselves, and we ask Congress to ask us: If not we — who are the real beneficiaries across the generations that we have raised — then whose word should count more? Who, beyond those who have paid in over the longest time, and who worry for a country we multiple times went to war for, offer a more convincing reason to be responsible? If older Americans are behind strengthening the system, why not all Americans?

So are we finally at the intersection of reality, reason, and solutions when it comes to assuring a Social Security Guarantee for our oldest generation, as well as for all Americans? Or are we going to walk by this intersection, a chance to accommodate a need for strong defense, important support for key discretionary spending programs, and a chance to finally, firmly, and with fairness rein in what we all understand as unsustainable entitlements?

In a moment of unlikely “coincidence of interest,” this is the moment to seriously offer the nation a workable way ahead, with stronger defense, meaningful discretionary additions where needed, and offsets in the form of genuine entitlement restructuring — with a full “Social Security Guarantee” in the bargain! Let us come together and not raise taxes unnecessarily, not impinge on the “full faith and credit” that so many seniors personally sacrificed to preserve. Let us instead, for once, get down to work, and get it done – right — and then take pride in the marvel of finding real solutions. If not now, one and all, when?


From - townhall.com - by Dan Weber

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!


Subscribe
Notify of
12 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gre
6 years ago

I agree that SS needs a fix. Let’s put the mentioned plan into affect for those turning 50 in 2016. I am currently 57 and have retired and part of my retirement planning included taking SS at 62. Not fair to those of us close to the goal line to move it out further. Make the fix but do it in a manner so folks have time to shift their plans and make budgetary changes. Not when someone is close enough they can smell it and then poof, the end date moves. Not fair to those of us that are close.

Terry
7 years ago

SS has been broke for 5 years. It is adding to the deficit and debt. There is no trust fund. These are FACTS. If conservatives don’t see this God help America. Only Government accounting says differently and they are lying. Also SS is NOT a conservative concept and needs to be ended. I want my grandchildren to put the 12.4% of their pay into a private account in their names that the government can’t touch and they use it for their own retirement, no SS. This will work for health, unemployment, disability etc. insurances also. Private accounts for all these. Conservative ideals at work. Then a safety net which you borrow from if you need it and pay back, tied to voting, if you borrow you don’t vote until you pay back. Right now start by giving W-2s for all freebies. You will be shocked how much “free” money you give a family of 4 that is now living in poverty with food insecurity.. Maybe $60k

Ray Banowetz
7 years ago

If people are not putting money in a retirement account now this new government controlled ERA retirement account is not going to help Social Security.

PaulO
7 years ago

The notion that the government borrowed money from the Social Security Trust fund and never paid it back is a MYTH.

Social Security payroll taxes collected are used to buy special treasury securities/bonds which in turn are cashed to pay out current benefits to recipients.

Bonds are debt with a promise to pay. Sophisticated investors buy US bonds every day.

I agree SS will need some tweaks for future recipients but don’t privatize Social Security the stock market could tank again like 2008.

HAM
7 years ago
Reply to  PaulO

It’s not a myth, it was a slight of hand and a theft/fraud no matter how you look at it. SS funds can only be invested in securities backed by the Federal government such as treasury bills, treasury notes, treasury bonds & special issue bonds. The government “invests” SS funds by lending the money to themselves then spends it on programs which have nothing to do with SS. The government is supposed to “pay back” SS when the SS program redeems the bonds. When SS hits the projected deficit & redeems the bonds, is the Treasury Dept going to have the “cash” to buy back the bonds and “pay back” SS? Probably not without borrowing it. Do you wonder why young people are upset about SS? It’s not that the money wasn’t there, it’s the theft that has caused the SS short fall.

You are spouting the same spin we have heard for years. The Politicians don’t want to give up their “slush fund” and will fight to keep it like it is. The funds need to be protected against being “borrowed” or in any way used except what directly & immediately that benefits the SS Fund. If this isn’t done SS will continue to have financial problems.

Alan
6 years ago
Reply to  PaulO

In 1982 the SS Trust Funds had a balance of $12.5 blliion, all IOU’s or special government notes. These notes cannot be bought and sold on the open market like regular US Treasuries. They can only be redeemed by a payment from the General Fund. The balance in the SS Trust Funds is now $2.8 trillion. Again, all of that has been borrowed by the General Fund and is in the form of special notes or IOU’s from the General Fund.

Privatizing Social Security doesn’t have to mean that the funds are invested in the stock market. The funds could be invested in US Treasuries, Government Bonds or Corporate Bonds. An individual could adjust their investment mix based on their tolerance for risk.

PaulO
7 years ago

AMAC proposes we invest 50% of our Social Security funds in non-guaranteed investments, like the S&P 500.

What happens to the “AMAC SS Guarantee” if the stock market crashes like it did September 2008?

Remember in January at the beginning of GW Bush’s 2nd term, he wanted to privatize or partially privatize Social Security. The American voters loathed it. It was a dead issue by Memorial Day 2005.

Good thing too, imagine if we had 50% of Social security’s assets invested in the September 2008 stock market crash.

HAM
7 years ago
Reply to  PaulO

Yeah, I guess it’s better to leave it in the hands of greedy politicians who look upon it as a SLUSH FUND and steal the money for whatever their pet project is at the moment, like $812 billion being given to MEDICAID to pay for Obamcare?

I don’t think the problem is how the money is being invested. The PROBLEM is that the money needs to NOT be availabe to sleazy politicians so they can give it to other programs which have NOTHING to do with SS or Medicare such as (most recently) $812 billion given to MEDICAID to fund Obamacare. Now, another politician has said more needs to be taken from SS funds to prop up SSDI. We all know the problem is the masses of people who have been allowed (during the Obama administration) to draw SSDI who are not legitimately 100% disabled. Politicians have always looked upon SS money as a SLUSH FUND and that is what needs to be corrected. GET SS MONEY OUT OF THE HANDS OF THE POLITICIANS!!

PaulO
7 years ago
Reply to  HAM

What are you talking about?

Please read the article again nowhere does it mention Medicare?

Medicare and Social Security have different revenue sources.

Please learn the facts.

HAM
7 years ago
Reply to  PaulO

Yes I know Medicare was not mentioned.

HAM
7 years ago
Reply to  PaulO

You do realize the $812 billion I mentioned was stolen from MEDICARE and used to fund expansion of MEDICAID under Obamacare? So it’s theft of Seniors money no matter whether you are talking SS ir Medicare.

Terry
7 years ago
Reply to  HAM

I pray for Paulo defending the government that has run up over $18T in debt. Sophisticates invest in bonds because the companies they invest in have real estate, plants, workers, good products, store in their neighborhood, profits record and lawful accounting practices, etc. and still it is risky. The government has your tax money, which is record high this year, and still $500B deficit this year. Equally divided that $7,000 for each family of 4 for this year alone on top of the $250,000 they already owe. And Paulo would buy a bond from this government that a high school wresting coach can pay $3.5 million dollars to a extortionist with out denting his private funds and he is just one of hundred of thousand do nothing people telling Paulo “Trust Me” and bless his soul Paulo does. God help America.

12
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x