Abortion / Government Watch / Politics / Pro-Life

Roe v. Wade Is History, but the Abortion Debate Reveals Rot at America’s Center


This week, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a ruling overdue by some five decades, striking down Roe v. Wade (1973) and its constitutionally unsubstantiated “right to abortion.” Writing for the 6-3 majority in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Justice Samuel Alito stated, “The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision…It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”

Despite the media’s wailing and gnashing of teeth, and despite Democrats’ impotent roars of rage, the reality is that the Supreme Court decision was not extreme in any way. It did not reflect the most ardent desires of pro-lifers. It did not, for example, declare a right to life applicable to unborn children under the 14th Amendment’s guarantee against the removal of “life, liberty or property, without due process of law.” Nor did the decision follow the legally correct advice of Justice Clarence Thomas, who recommended trashing the Supreme Court doctrine of “substantive due process,” a persistently and irritatingly vague rubric that generally acts as a pretext for courts to pursue their favored public policy objectives. The decision did not even suggest that the federal Congress had the power to regulate abortion in place of state laws.

No, the Dobbs ruling returns the status of the question of abortion to the status quo ante prior to Roe. Now states will decide how and when to regulate abortion. Some states, like Texas, will work to bar abortion except in cases in which the mother’s life is in danger. Others, like New York, will cheer abortion up until the point of actual birth. No consensus policy is likely to emerge, because there is no consensus on the issue among Americans.

Yet Democrats and the media seem firmly convinced that the re-animation of abortion as a state law issue will somehow translate into 2022 electoral victory. There is little evidence to this effect: State laws generally reflect the opinions of those who live in those states, and the most ardent abortion defenders tend to reside in heavily blue areas where abortion will be freely available. It’s hard to believe that Manhattan residents are going to show up to the polls en masse to vote on Alabama’s abortion policy — and even if they did, it would make no difference in House or Senate elections in Ohio.

There is another problem for Democrats, too. That problem lies in the simple fact that if Americans do vote based on abortion, they don’t do so purely based on preferred abortion policy. They do so based on the attitude of the parties toward abortion generally. And today, the party of abortion extremism is the Democratic Party, which long ago abandoned the logically unsound but emotionally appealing rubric of “safe, legal and rare,” instead substituting the hideously monstrous “shout your abortion.” The Democratic Party moved away from moral condemnation of abortion because Democrats now believe that human happiness is rooted in subjective self-definition, particularly with regard to sexual activity; that biology, particularly pregnancy and childbearing, is an active imposition on such a vision of human happiness; and that abortion is therefore a sacrament to be protected.

Few Americans outside of solid blue areas agree with these bizarre and ugly notions. So, while Democrats suggest that voters will resonate to their abortion messaging, fearful of abortion restrictions that might prohibit them from terminating their pregnancies, they miss a broader point: their vision of human happiness and the measures necessary to achieve it are not in line with that of most Americans. And that means that the culture war that the Left began is now turning against them, as it should.

Ben Shapiro, 38, is a graduate of UCLA and Harvard Law School, host of “The Ben Shapiro Show,” and Editor-in-Chief of DailyWire.com. He is a three-time New York Times bestselling author; his latest book is “The Authoritarian Moment: How The Left Weaponized America’s Institutions Against Dissent.”


Choose Life Donate Button

While you’re here, we have a small favor to ask…

Support Breath of Life Center Inc, an AMAC sponsored 501 (C)(3) charity. We believe in the sanctity of human life and wish to help women through education, support, and direction. Help us in our effort to “be a voice for the voiceless”!

Donate Now

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Andrew P
6 months ago

The Dobbs decision could help the Democrats if they had the sense to exploit it properly. So far, they are not. The Democrat’s problem is that their core voters don’t believe the Democrats are truly serious. They don’t trust them to actually deliver on their promises. Trump delivered a court that overturned Roe. The best way for the Democrats to show they are truly serious is for Kamala Harris to hold a massive million-abortion rally tour going through all 50 States, now until election day, with a Trump-style rally every single day, and by performing thousands of free abortions at every rally. She should have a huge gaggle of abortionists with her operating out of big tents. In states where abortion is illegal (like Texas), she should have fleets of buses waiting to ship the women to a neighboring state, or means to take them to a freighter at sea, or she should hold the rally in a national park or military base where state law does not apply. She should be the national evangelist for Abortion, and she should show the commitment to the cause by her actions – by aborting a million babies in her campaign tour. Word salads saying nothing will not do.

Kenneth D.
6 months ago

It will be interesting and perhaps sobering to witness the USSC with Ms. Brown Jackson on the bench. She has already admitted under oath that she is not capable of defining what constitutes being a woman. Will she recuse herself whenever a case arises where gender or any other of the myriad of so-called “preferences” are involved? I believe her obvious obsession with political correctness and, no doubt, “wokeness, should place her objectivity and adherence to constitutional interests in question.

6 months ago

The attitude of the Democrat Party on abortion is not what most of Americans believe. They are out of step with the majority of Americans. Their reactons are juvenile and exhibit a clear lack of knowledge of humanity. How any human being can be so against a human baby that is totally helpless in the womb and wants to destroy it the safest place that is the santuary of protection of the mother, It is sicking, There needs to be a greater emphasis placed on human life in the womb. It needs to start with the adults who use their sexuallity like a toy and brought the realization that recognizes the real object of human reproduction. A sex education combined with a moral training from your religious upbringing is required.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x