Advocacy

Obama Health Care Law Headed to Supreme Court

By Gene Barrett

The US Supreme Court will decide on November 10 whether or not to consider the case of President Barack Obama’s controversial health care law. The decision, which will be made in closed session by the nine justices, could be made public that day or on the following Monday, November 14. The justices will assess five of the six pending petitions regarding issues such as the constitutionality of the individual mandate and the severability of the law.

Twenty-six states are among those who have sued over the legislation passed by Congress and signed by the president on March 23, 2010. The most important issue involves whether the Congress exceeded its power by requiring that all Americans buy health insurance or pay a penalty. These states want the courts to make a decision before the next presidential cycle. If the court does decide to weigh the case, arguments would follow and the justices would be expected to rule by the end of their term in June 2012.

On the issue of timing, their cause got an unexpected boost from retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, who said voters would be better off if they knew the law’s fate before casting their ballots next year.

The 91-year-old Stevens said in an Associated Press interview that the justices would not shy away from deciding the case in the middle of a presidential campaign and would be doing the country a service. “It would be better to have that known about than be speculated as a part of the political argument,’’ Stevens said in his Supreme Court office.

This historic challenge, by over half of the states in the nation, offers the court an ideal vehicle to resolve pressing constitutional questions arising from the President’s unprecedented legislative initiative.

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Sign Up Today

Leave a Reply

77 Comments on "Obama Health Care Law Headed to Supreme Court"

Notify of
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted

Simply wish to say your article is as astonishing. The clarity in your submit is just great and that i can think you’re a professional on this subject. Well together with your permission let me to clutch your feed to stay updated with coming near near post. Thanks one million and please continue the gratifying work.

Otti 2. Dezember 2011 Der Pineapple Mark III bireast auf den ‘ALFA Network AP51′, dieser hat weniger Sendeleistung als der iMesh 51. Ich könnte mir schon vorstellen, das es funktioniert, doch aufgrund der höheren Sendeleistung, ist dann ggf. nichts mit einer portablen Version, was ja recht genial ist.Zudem – und das vergessen viele, funktioniert der Pineapple nur mit offenen Netzen, sprich es gibt nur dann brauchbare Probe-Requests, wenn das Ziel ein offenes Netzwerk unter den Favs gespeichert hat. Doch das nur als Info, weil viele das nicht wissen und dies in den Clips von Darren nicht geklärt wird.Aus dem Grund wäre eine mobile Version wesentlich besser, denn an Flughäfen, Bahnhöfen, Schulen / Uni etc., gibt es dann schon mehr zu sehen.

Because the Supreme Court is scheduled to rule of Obama’s Health Care law, what plans does AMAC done to inform the Court of our Senior Citizens Health Care Concerns. Such as cutting 591.Billion from Medicare, which most of this cut will be directly affecting Senior benefits. Such as Doctor shortage, cutting Insurance Advantage programs, and cutting Senior care procedures. Not to mention raising benefit premiums.

REMOVE INTERSTATE COMMERCE RESTRICTIONS ON PURCHASING HEALTHCARE. Surely the Supreme Court realizes this clause was created for the Federal Government to regulate the competing tariffs and currencies between the States two hundred years ago, not the cost of breakfast at the International House of Pancakes. The health insurance costs here in California are literally three times higher than Kentucky, even though we have a much broader base to spread risk. There are some 1,700 health insurance companies in America but California has access to little more than a dozen. This quarantining workers and employers from purchasing a more suitable insurance policy is the greatest obstacle to economic recovery. Industry will not hire until Obamacarre is overturned. It is far more important to me to be able to afford groceries than be forced to purchase a $10,000 health insurance policy under Obamacare, especially since I can get catastrophic health insurance from… Read more »

Great Article! Excellent read and informative.

it would be good for us in the US to look at other countries who, over the years, have fine-tuned their systems but there is the 600-lb gorilla in the room a) tort reform [liability insurance is out of hand and doctors fear of liability, makes health care ridiculous, such waste just to cover every eventuality incase one gets sued b) can we buy any place we like or still just in the State we live in – as politicians want and need that control? Why? c) can the government make us buy it. (The Car analogy is wrong and silly, you don’t have to have car insurance if you don’t own or drive a car.) d) and the government running it? Oh Dear! That will be “fun”. The current system needs repealing and to be re-discussed. The Dutch system seems to be quite logical [without being cynical that doesn’t… Read more »

I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government form wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.

We now are seeing government by the polititians rather than by the people.

We are a year away from saving our country and reclaiming the freedom and prosperity that so many of us as seniors worked to build. We have to take the lead, NOW. Some of our kids and grandkids were duped by Obama and his slick, teleprompter speeches. And many seniors were duped into supporting him after he bought AARP’s support. It is time for us to get active, educate our families and those around us and support a true conservative who will reverse this ruinous socialistic slope we are going down with Obama.

the # 666 in Gods word refers to man

Let us hope the Supreme Court is honest about this and act accordingly.

It is naive to assume that judges will not act according to who appointed them. Why do you think there is so much hype in an election year when judges are up for reappointment? Convervatives want their own judges to be appointed and likewise for liberals.

Let us hope that the Judges act accordingly and not because of who apponted them into office.

People who can pay will still have the freedom and option to choose their own insurance company as well as their own doctors so nothing will change for them except that their insurance rates will probably go down.

We usually spend some time in the winter at an RV park in Fla. Most of the tenants are peop;e frpm Canada to receive their medical care in the US since the Canadian system is so poor. I wonder where they will go if Obummercare stays.

Next all the rabid conservatives will by crying that mandatory auto insurance is unconsitutional. Yes the uninsured DO hurt us. We pay higher medical bills because of their unapaid hospital bills and we all pay higher insurance rates because fewer people are in the system. Obamacare is far from socialized medicine. It is a compromise that maximizes the efficiencies of the free market system.

My Healthcare is in Jesus hands and whatever Doctor I choose. No Government can have any say whatsoever in this sacred institution. Obamacare is unconstitutional and Satanic.

The Obama Care issues is an issue of control. We need to have freedom to choose our own doctors. Obama is failed in every way. The us get rid of his strangle hold on health care.

that is READ,,sorry for the typo

Everyone please red Democracy Denied by Phil Kerpen..Says it all..Obama should be impeached right now for shredding our constitution!…if something is not done NOW our country will be lost for good….and we will have a world legal system run by the UN….check out how much land has been taken by the federal government…and if you think ACORN has been defunded check it out……