Newsline

Newsline , Society

The Thieves Who Stole Our Election Got Sloppy

Posted on Wednesday, November 25, 2020
|
by Outside Contributor
|
10 Comments
|
Print

ballotsLaziness leads to sloppiness, and sloppiness is how the most brazen heist in American history is being exposed.

Stealing the 2020 election was a mammoth undertaking, involving widespread lawlessness and illicit partnerships between private actors and public officials. They’ve been working to cover their tracks since Election Day, but they didn’t work fast enough. Now, the courts need to stop them from destroying any more evidence so that the people of Pennsylvania—and the rest of the country—can accurately assess the ramifications of their wrongdoing.

Explosive new litigation filed in federal district court on Nov. 21 details and documents a wide variety of illegal practices that were used to inflate the number of votes received by Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden, including disparate treatment of voters based on where they live and outright manipulation of Pennsylvania’s voter registration system by partisan activists.

An unprecedented number of mail-in and absentee ballots were cast this year, and practically everyone expected that this would result in a higher-than-usual rate of ballots being rejected for various flaws, such as lacking a secrecy envelope or missing information. In Pennsylvania, tens or hundreds of thousands of ballots were likely to be rejected, based on historical patterns. Instead, a mere 0.03 percent of mail-in ballots were ultimately rejected—somewhere in the neighborhood of about 1,000 votes.

Considering that a significant majority of mail-in votes were cast for Biden, the Democrat candidate benefited handsomely from this discrepancy. But how did this anomaly happen?

It turns out that election officials in Democrat strongholds such as Allegheny County (Pittsburgh), Philadelphia County, and Philadelphia’s collar counties—particularly Delaware County—exceeded their authority in order to give voters preferential treatment that wasn’t afforded to voters in Republican-leaning areas of the state.

Specifically, election workers illegally “pre-canvassed” mail-in ballots to determine whether they were missing a secrecy envelope or failed to include necessary information. When ballots were found to be flawed, voters were given an opportunity to correct, or “cure,” their ballots to make sure they counted. In at least some cases, Democrat Party officials were even given lists of voters to contact about curing their ballots.

Election officials in Republican-leaning counties rightly interpreted this as a violation of Pennsylvania’s election code, but Democrat Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar issued guidance authorizing the illegal practices despite lacking the statutory authority to do so.

That’s not the only way Democrats broke the law to give their candidate an unfair advantage, though. Extensive on-the-ground investigations conducted over the past year and a half by attorneys and investigators with the Amistad Project of the nonpartisan Thomas More Society have uncovered another element of the plot that involved even more egregious behavior.

Boockvar also exceeded her authority by granting private, partisan organizations—including the notoriously pro-Democrat group “Rock the Vote”—access to the Commonwealth’s Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors (SURE).

“Rock the Vote’s web tool was connected to our system, making the process of registering voters through their online programs, and those of their partners, seamless for voters across Pennsylvania,” the lawsuit quotes Boockvar as saying.

That’s not supposed to happen. It’s one thing for outside groups to submit registration applications to the state on behalf of would-be voters, but election clerks are the only ones who are supposed to enter this sort of information directly into the records.

It’s easy to see why by inspecting post-election voter lists, which contain names such as “Mary April Smith,” followed by “Mary May Smith,” “Mary June Smith,” “Mary July Smith,” and so forth through the rest of the calendar. When the same voter lists were purchased just a week later, however, those suspicious names had mysteriously disappeared from the rolls.

Under the circumstances, that’s direct evidence of a systematic effort to conceal wrongdoing. All further alterations to the SURE system should be immediately halted to allow a thorough investigation of the records before any more evidence can be destroyed.

The thieves who attempted to hijack the 2020 presidential election were bound to slip up somewhere, and now they’re trying to clean up the glaring evidence of their wrongdoing before the full extent of their crimes can be exposed to the American public. We can’t allow that to happen, or we may never be able to trust the integrity of our elections again.

Newt Gingrich, a Republican, served as House speaker from 1995 to 1999 and ran as a presidential candidate in 2012.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
PaulE
PaulE
3 years ago

What courts look for is what specific number of votes were impacted by each instance of the various activities you have outlined and whether that amount is sufficient to swing the voting result the other way in the states under question. A pure numbers game in essence. Obviously there was voter fraud on several levels in this election, as the Democrats and their financial backers had four years to lay out a strategy to did so in various ways. They went about so much of it in a a very “in your face” manner.

Were they sloppy? Yes, and they were also in many cases very overt about it (papering over the windows to counting rooms, keeping Republican poll watchers 30 feet away so as to make ballot verification impossible, nearly a million ballots across multiple states with only Biden checked off and the rest of the ballot blank), but all the courts are narrowly focused on is “How many specific ballots can you verify were were fraudulent at each and every instance you are claiming fraud occurred?” If the answer is either “We can’t supply an exact count (unless they have sworn affidavits from someone witnessing or involved in the actual incident being claimed) or the totals don’t exceed the number of votes that Biden won the state by through fraud, the courts are NOT going to over-turn the state results. Especially after the legislatures in these states have already certified the results. Don’t assume courts are purely apolitical, because many are not.

What the author is pointing to are the constitutional merits, which is perfectly fine. However, the Supreme Court is not likely going to invalidate the election (not if John Roberts has anything to say), at the presidential level only, and throw the decision to the House of Representatives unless Rudy and the rest of the remaining Trump legal team can show enough specific fraudulent vote totals equal to or exceeding the number of votes Biden supposedly “won” by.

The Democrats are likely already destroying evidence to cover their tracks. So the idea that we will be able to investigate how they successfully stole the election through multiple means of fraud is shrinking as each day passes. The idea that some Congressional panel moving at the speed of a snail is going to “get to the bottom of this” is just something to mollify the public. The DOJ and the FBI should have been on the ground in the six states in question as soon as they all ceased counting election night. The problem is both organizations obviously want a Democrat to win. So yes, we can never trust the integrity of our elections again.

Rik
Rik
3 years ago

People, President Trump won his re-election in a landslide!!! … I just found out that Army Special Forces seized the servers in Germany with all the election information on them. For one it shows bribery payments to both Governor Kemp and the Secretary of State of Georgia. It also shows how many millions of votes were switched from President Trump to Jackass Joe Biden. Attorney Sidney Powell has all this information and will be filing suit next and will reveal so much evidence that it is biblical. But be prepared … the Progressively Communist Democrats know this and may try to declare President Trump as mentally ill and have Obama appointed Generals seize him and put the whole country under Martial Law! If this happens, We the People must be ready to go to his defense in overwhelmingly numbers. Also, don’t be surprised if something “happens” to Attorney Sidney Powell to stop her. So spread the word!

Bill Brown
Bill Brown
3 years ago

The 2020 Election is so full of FRAUD that anyone who claims there was no significant Fraud is a LIAR!!! If the 2020 election stands, our Federal Government is no longer legitimate!!! It has become time to TAKE-BACK OUR Government!!!!! Join the Trump Movement – The American Revolution 2.0!!! Become a Counter-Revolutionary!!! Stand-up for Our Republic!!!! Remove Every DemocRat!!!!!

Bill Brown
Bill Brown
3 years ago

Trust no one! TODAY, ask the Supreme Court to make a nationwide Injunction against destroying or filing any and all documents, data, emails, electronic media, etc. relating to the 2020 Federal Election! Join the Trump Movement – The American Revolution 2.0!!! Become a Counter-Revolutionary!!! Stand-up for Our Republic!!!! Remove Every DemocRat/Communist!!!!!

An older blonde women laughing in the kitchen with a grey haired man.
AMAC’s Medicare Advisory Service
The knowledge, guidance, and choices of coverage you’re looking for. The exceptional service you deserve.
The AMAC App on 3 different iPhone
Download the AMAC App
The AMAC App is the place to go for insightful news wherever you are and whenever you want.
pentecost
biden medicare advantage
Ranked-Choice Voting
JCN; Job Creators Network

Stay informed! Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter.

"*" indicates required fields

10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Subscribe to AMAC Daily News and Games