Newsline

Newsline , Society

Post-Election Reflection: Are the Democrats “Noble Liars?”

Posted on Saturday, November 19, 2022
|
by David Lewis Schaefer
|
110 Comments
Democrat

AMAC Exclusive – By David Lewis Schaefer

As Democratic Party leaders breathe a sigh of relief considering the failure of the widely-expected “red wave” to materialize in last week’s Congressional elections – Republicans won only a narrow margin in the House while Democrats will maintain control of the Senate – the thought that the election result signifies any popular mandate for a continuance of Joe Biden’s policies (and hence a likely Democratic victory in the 2024 Presidential election) is probably ill-advised. In the first place, it should be noted that Republicans won a majority of the popular vote in this year’s election (the standard by which Democratic leaders have challenged the legitimacy of the 2000 and 2016 Presidential election outcomes). But it might also be wise for them to reconsider an attitude toward voters which has characterized their party for at least the past quarter-century, and which is reminiscent of the ironic proposal of Socrates in Plato’s most famous dialogue, The Republic, composed some 2,500 years ago.

In the dialogue, Socrates asserts that in a perfectly just city, the obedience of the multitude to the commands of the “guardians” who rule them should be enforced through the inculcation of a “noble lie.” In order to persuade the people of their total belongingness to their political community, Socrates explains that they must somehow be made to think that their ancestors were literally born from its earth. To dissuade them from rebelling against its class structure, they must also be convinced that human beings are each born with one of three different metals in their souls (gold, silver, or bronze), so that the class to which they belong (guardians, warriors, or commoners) is similarly fixed by nature.

The noble lie is manifestly absurd, and Plato means for attentive readers to recognize the impossibility of a population embracing it. By extension, such readers will also come to recognize the impossibility, the injustice, and the radical unnaturalness of attempting to establish a perfectly unitary political community based on myths, and the folly of utopian idealists who would justify the sort of totalitarian rule exemplified by Sparta to achieve such a goal.

But instead of reflecting awareness of these facts, statements by prominent supporters, advisers, and agents of the Democratic Party in recent years would suggest that they agree with the notion that lying is perfectly acceptable, given voters’ gullibility or downright ignorance, so long as it serves the Democrats’ ostensibly wise and just political and policy goals.

Take, for example, President Obama’s dishonest promise during his campaign on behalf of the so-called Affordable Care Act that if it were adopted, patients would be able to keep their existing doctors and health plans if they wanted. More egregiously, MIT Professor Jonathan Gruber, the Act’s chief architect, subsequently explained at a conference why the Obamacare bill had intentionally been “written in a tortured way.” He explained that it was composed that way to ensure that the Congressional Budget Office would label the bill as a “mandate” rather than a “tax,” requiring healthy people to pay more so as to subsidize the treatment costs of sick people – a necessary subterfuge to bring about the bill’s passage. He elaborated that “Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter, or whatever, but basically that was really, really critical for the thing to pass.” Note Gruber’s equation of an unwillingness by voters to pay higher taxes for the benefit of a minority – for whom all sorts of subsidies for health care were already available – with a lack of intelligence. Apparently, he didn’t think that members of the Congressional Budget Office were all that bright, either.

Now, dishonesty of one sort or another is a given in political life. Sometimes, perhaps, it is even morally justifiable – for instance, Franklin Roosevelt’s roundabout actions to offer assistance to Great Britain, which was under assault from Nazi Germany, in 1940, despite what would have been the opposition of an isolationist Congress. What is striking about Gruber’s statement, however, is his open espousal (admittedly, to a private group) of the desirability of concealing the truth from the public, given their “stupidity.” Is this government-by-enlightened-bureaucrats, enforced through deception over ignorant plebeians, consistent with the principles of constitutional government?

Recall as well in this connection House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s explanation of why there wasn’t time for Congress to actually inspect the bill’s contents: “We have to pass it to find out what’s in it.” Perhaps most members of Congress were themselves too stupid, in the eyes of Democratic leaders, to deserve an understanding of what they were voting for. But why didn’t some Democrats object to having to vote for something that they didn’t have the opportunity to inspect, first? Might they have been too ignorant to understand it?

Next, let’s recall remember Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s repeated but entirely false contention on the Senate floor, during the 2012 Presidential campaign, that Republican nominee Mitt Romney – a Mormon of, by all reliable accounts, impeccable character – had avoided paying any taxes before 2010. The unsubstantiated claim received a rating of four “Pinocchios” by the Washington Post fact checker. False though the charge was, it must have left a negative impression in some voters’ minds, one that was enhanced by its frequent uncritical repetition in the media. Three years later when a CNN interviewer asked Reid whether he had any regrets about having made the false accusation, he mumbled the following response: “I don’t regret that at all. Romney didn’t win, did he?”

Again, what is most striking is not that Reid made false charges against a political opponent. After all, the use of deceptive political rhetoric is by no means limited to Democratic partisans. But it is Democrats, with the complicity of the media, who seem to have made the more or less open assertion of a right to deceive the public. What stands out with respect to Senator Reid’s attack on Romney is Reid’s shamelessness in implicitly acknowledging afterwards that the charges had no merit other than to enhance his favored candidate’s electoral chances. Like Gruber, Reid felt that the rightness of his cause was so great that he didn’t need to apologize for egregiously misleading the American people.

A more recent illustration of the same attitude is exemplified by a statement from David Priess, former CIA official (under both the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations) and currently a fellow in security policy at George Mason University. Priess was one of 51 former intelligence officials who signed a statement, issued just before the 2020 election, dismissing the damning revelations of corruption outlined in the infamous Hunter Biden laptop as having “all the classic earmarks of a Russian [dis]information operation.”

As New York Post columnist Miranda Devine observed in a recent column, “not one of the 51 had seen any material from the laptop or bothered asking for it,” but their letter, backed by their supposed expertise, immediately “killed the story,” and was used by Joe Biden on October 22, 2020, “to deflect [Donald] Trump’s attack in their last debate.” In support of the letter’s veracity, Biden cited his own “reputation… for honor and telling the truth.” That reputation would already have been rendered doubtful, among voters with some memory, by his having plagiarized a campaign speech from a Welsh politician in his 1988 campaign for the Democratic Presidential nomination. But Biden concluded his response by saying “the character of the country is on the ballot.” The implication was that if voters didn’t elect him, that would cast a poor light not only on their intelligence but, apparently, their character.

As Devine observes, at no time since the laptop’s discovery has any evidence been brought forward to call into question the truth of its contents. But in a recent interview, Priess defended the letter, as Devine puts it, “by saying people were too stupid to understand it.” He insisted that the letter was “’still true’ because it did not use the words ‘Russian disinformation’ but concocted the weasel phrase ‘earmarks of a Russian information operation’” (my emphasis). As he explained, “It’s not my fault if people don’t look up definitions.”

As the 2022 campaign entered its final week, even the New York Times editors felt compelled to run a story (admittedly, buried on page 18) titled “President Boasts of Economic Gains with Talking Points that Don’t Really Add Up.” Featured in the story were Biden’s false claims that America currently has the fastest-growing economy in the world (a July report from the International Monetary Fund listed several European and Asian countries whose 2022 growth rates exceeded this country’s), that his student debt forgiveness program passed Congress by two votes owing to his leadership (in fact, Biden imposed the program through an executive order, probably unconstitutional, without submitting it for a vote), that his “leadership” had also engendered a $1.4 trillion decline in the budget deficit (which occurred only because the $1.9 trillion “pandemic relief” package that the President pushed through Congress in 2021 hadn’t been renewed), and that Social Security benefits will become more generous in 2023 thanks to him (the cost-of-living formula, which raises benefits for the coming year owing to inflation that Biden’s own policies are widely recognized to have brought about, is built into law, and had nothing to do with any presidential initiative.)

But Harvard economist and former Obama adviser Jason Furman explained that Biden’s misstatements were merely “leaps of logic” of a sort that are common during election campaigns, and that they weren’t really “like making stuff up,” but “just making a rather stretched and peculiar causal argument around true facts” – as opposed, presumably, to “false” facts. (Furman’s indecipherable distinction might be comprehensible only to Jonathan Gruber. At this point perhaps a better strategy for Democratic obfuscators would be pollster Stan Greenberg’s recommendation for dealing with questions about their party’s unpopular record on crime and policing: “speak as little as possible or mumble,” or else “change the subject” as soon as possible.)

Running throughout the statements by Gruber, Reid, Biden, and Priess is an attitude of unabashed scorn for the intelligence of the American public. It’s not theirfault if ordinary people are too “stupid” to appreciate the benefits of Obamacare, to recognize what a superior President Barack Obama would be over Mitt Romney, to cherish the Biden administration’s real economic achievements, or to read a statement issued by 51 supposed intelligence authorities (many of whom occupy prime positions in the think-tank world, and who are longtime Trump opponents) with sufficient care to detect its subtleties. (Not that those subtleties were picked up by the media themselves at the time.)

Contrary to its reputation among inattentive readers as a recipe for totalitarianism, The Republic was intended by Plato not only as a critique of the utopian totalitarian spirit, but as an inspiration and guide for thoughtful readers to engage in the philosophic questfor truth. It is not an elitist work, but rather an invitation for all human beings who seek knowledge, rather than resting content with the dominant myths or prejudices of their time, to think matters through for themselves. By contrast, prominent Democratic partisans (along with some Republicans, but with less explicitness about their attitude) now seem content not only to accept but to take advantage of popular ignorance or inattentiveness for their own gain, confident that they know what’s best for us. In sum, they view themselves as members of the highest class in Socrates’ three-tier structure, the “Guardians.”

The United States was founded on the premise stated in the Declaration of Independence that no adult is by nature the ruler or guardian of his fellow citizens, but rather that legitimate government derives its authority from the (informed) consent of the governed. As Thomas Jefferson put it in a letter he wrote just before the Declaration’s 50th anniversary (and right before his death), it was meant to be a signal of enlightenment to the entire world, liberating mankind from the chains of “monkish superstition” that had prevented them from assuming for themselves “the blessings and security of self-government.”

But Jefferson’s hope will become an empty promise if it becomes a widely accepted principle that officeholders not onlylie, but have every right to do so, as long as they stand for (what they regard as) justice, fortified by expertise. No individual who regards the people as ignoramuses, and thinks it justifiable as a matter of practice to deceive us for our own good, should have the right to govern us.

In last week’s election, Republican candidates for gubernatorial and Congressional office faced an uphill battle, as they have for decades, thanks to the influence of a mostly hostile press and electronic and social media (for instance, the banning from social media of the Biden laptop story during the weeks preceding the vote based on the specious “disinformation” claim). But as public awareness spreads of such distortions, and their perpetrators’ open (after-the-fact) acknowledgment of them, spreads, voters may be less susceptible to them.

This is not the place for assessing the relative severity of dishonest claims made by leaders of both parties and their media supporters over the last several administrations. Both Democrats and Republicans have often engaged in extremely reprehensible behavior in this regard. (On the Democratic side, think of Hillary Clinton’s attribution during her vice presidency of the terrorist attack on the CIA’s Benghazi outpost to an obscure anti-Muslim video that some staffer had discovered online.) My point, however, is that it is Democrats rather than Republicans who have engaged in more or less open, but ex post facto, admissions of such behavior, while claiming a moral right to engage in it, simply because of the intellectual and even moral inferiority of their opponents.  (Recall Barack Obama’s attribution of opposition to his 2008 Presidential candidacy to his election to racism, and Hillary Clinton’s dismissal of those who failed to support her as “deplorables.”)

Election analysts have noted an increasing shift within the electorate over at least the past three Presidential elections in which blue-collar workers having been switching their traditional loyalties from the Democrats to the Republicans, and Republicans are also making significant gains among Latino and even African-American voters, while members of the intellectual and financial “elite” guide Democratic policies, especially regarding “social” or moral issues like crime, immigration, abortion, transgender “education,” and gay marriage. (Glenn Youngkin may have owed his 2021 gubernatorial victory in Virginia to his rejection of his Democratic opponent Terry McAuliffe’s claim that parents had no right to interfere with the curriculum of the schools their kids attended.) As Howard Wolfson, a senior adviser to former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg (a Democrat-turned-liberal Republican) observed in the Times, the Democrats’ loss of four House seats in New York State, which may have cost the party a shot at maintaining a Congressional majority, was attributable to the “arrogance” of members of the state house in disregarding the demand of voters for altering bail “reform” laws that set many criminals free without bail, contributing to an alarming 30% rise in the City’s crime rate: holding large majorities in each house of the state legislature, along with the governorship, legislators simply dismissed their constituents’ unenlightened views. Wisely, Republican candidates for Congress “hammered” their Democratic opponents on this issue.

As awareness spreads among middle-class and blue-collar voters of the outright contempt with which they are regarded by Democratic leaders and their advisers, the 2022 election may signify the high-water mark of their party’s (relative) popularity among the electorate. Regardless of which party emerges victorious in 2024, the spread of such awareness could ultimately serve as a victory not only against inflation, crime, and the weakening of our national defenses under Democratic rule, but more fundamentally, for the principle of genuine constitutional-democratic governance.

David Lewis Schaefer is a Professor of Political Science at College of the Holy Cross.

Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
110 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James H
James H
1 year ago

If America would realize how foolish and condescending the Left is, things would change. Most politicians on the left are C- or lower students. They are not smart. They are simply opportunists who are only looking to enrich and empower themselves. They are hypocritical, greedy narcissists. They should never be in leadership rolls!

Phyllis
Phyllis
1 year ago

For years I was ignorant of politics trusting in the system. At 74 I regret not having educated myself in the things of politics. I totally agree with the author. People are waking up to the deception and lies that the elite class has held over us banking on our ignorance and complacency. Today, I don’t trust anything that comes from either side. I try to inform myself and make my own decision, with the Lord’s help. Wow! Just thinking of all the time I’ve wasted makes me sad. I pray that our youth will be taught to think form themselves and not to be involved in the “group think” movement. May the Lord have mercy on America.

Bob Jacks
Bob Jacks
1 year ago

It’s the press, stupid. Politicians will always lie, and power will always corrupt. This is why freedom of the press is in the Constitution, because the role of the free press is to call out the lies and hold politicians accountable. The reason that Democrats today are so much more dishonest than Republicans is not because they are inherently worse people, it is because they are allowed, even encouraged, to get away with it by a corrupt, biased, and dishonest press, and now, big tech.

Charlotte A Mahin
Charlotte A Mahin
1 year ago

There is NOTHING noble about the Democrat’s lying strategies. They have the media in their “pockets” so there are many people out there who have no idea what is really happening in our country. These media outlets don’t even mention the border crisis, the crime crisis, the inflation crisis, etc. There are only a few handful of stations that report the truth. Our president stands before us and tells us that this inflation is not as bad as we think, he has NEVER even once mentioned the mess at our border or the crisis of crime in our big blue cities. His own family has been taking millions from our enemies since 2013. There is hard evidence like bank records, emails, voicemails and bank alerts to prove this corruption is true yet the media refuses to report it. This disgusting corrupt “big guy” must be tried for TREASON. He is selling us tout o the Chi Coms.

mike
mike
1 year ago

Noble liars? …no.

Notable liars?… Absolutely!

Nobility has no connection to Democrat cupidity. They “lie and swear to it” for sheer raw power and wealth accumulation. The Democrat masses are drones who believe anything because they know nothing. Therefore. the propagandists can spread obvious and despicable lies with impunity.

The internet has exposed their propensity for notable lies. Democrat policies are exactly like
democrat pronouncements…vapid, condescending, and worthless.

The Repubocrat uni-party, based in Washington DC lies, then is aghast when sensible people recognize their deceit.

Common sense and practicality are not a friend of the Repubocrats. Lying is their lifeblood.

Chris
Chris
1 year ago

What do you expect when the American people keep *rewarding* the Dems for their lies and electing them? The Dems know they lied over and over again and that it cost them nothing; what else are they supposed to think with regard to the people who voted for them?

In a very sad why the Dems are correct, many of the American people really are that stupid (apparently) — Fetterman? Come on now, what other explanation is there? Even if it took some cheating to push him over the line, it shouldn’t have been close!

The biggest part of the problem is that so many Americans are morally ignorant (aka stupid). Our system is broken precisely because of that. As John Adams put it, our system is intended for a moral and religious people. It’s not fit for any other people and right now it’s hard to claim that large swaths of the American people are moral and they certainly aren’t religious (beyond observing some forms).

In computer science/programming there’s a phrase that fits — Garbage in, garbage out. The system can only produce good results if the inputs (in this case voters’ opinions) are sound. While bad results can come from flawed systems, even good systems will produce bad results with bad inputs.

If it is the case that the Dems attitudes are a result of the current state of affairs and less the cause of them, then I hold out little hope of any future correction. It will only get worse unless the American people smarten up.

Kelly
Kelly
1 year ago

If Democrats had brains they’d be Republicans!

Carl
Carl
1 year ago

The Democratic Party and their propagandists; the legacy media collude to defraud the American People of the truth. This collusion costs the Republican Party votes, additional taxation for its citizens, gives more power to the Democratic Party and hides their move to create a socialist at best, communist society at worst. A “Noble Lie” is a myth.

Ed J
Ed J
1 year ago

Liars? YES!!! Noble? Absolutely NOT!!! They and their lamestream media buddies echo the Ministry of Truth in George Orwell’s book, 1984.

Robin W Boyd
Robin W Boyd
1 year ago

“Noble liars?” No. Those who are liars, mostly Progressive Democrats pushing Socialism, are simply liars.

Julyette Willmann
Julyette Willmann
1 year ago

Liars, yes. Noble, no.

Paul Rossetti
Paul Rossetti
1 year ago

All well and true! Perhaps the Republicans should now focus on representing the people’s interests instead of their own personal and political interests? In the next two years, our nation will be focused on inflationary conditions and ideas on recovery and reduction in government spending, which will inevitably lead to increased taxes. As I always say, “Someone in the room needs to be the adult.” Stop finding fault in the opposition and instead offer valid solutions to the issues. I believe the American people are pretty much fed up with the negativity and continuing attacks on opposing views. Let us get back to the basic principles and unite our country behind sound ideas that benefit the majority of our people and stop over compensating on the WOKE ( BROKE) agendas. Republicans or Democrats, represent the people and we will find harmony to reunite as one country!

Gayle
Gayle
1 year ago

Conniving manipulators, more accurately

Sid
Sid
1 year ago

“Noble”? No. “Liars”? The best ever. Almost as good as the devil himself.

Gunny Joe
Gunny Joe
1 year ago

Until the news media, print,broadcast, and digitized, start reporting the facts vice feelings and just one side views, and down right lies, the liberal elected officials will continue to lie and rule in their best interest not the American peoples.
Till the schools, all levels K to Doctorate are impartial, teaching true history, that the Construction is a contract with the People that is not a living document. The people are not going to vote these people out, or want a clean vote , or a clean responsible/responsive government.
We know all or most of the how and why we are here, so far we have no clear clean way to correct the problem and people who get the government hand out do not want to give them up.

Tom, of Texas
Tom, of Texas
1 year ago

What a long are to comment there is nothing honorable, nor noble about Demonrats. Demonrats are simply e v i l.

Letts Brandon
Letts Brandon
1 year ago

I don’t know what you meant by “genuine constitutional-democratic governance.” After all the talk of dishonesty and stupidity. Maybe you meant genuine governance of a constitutional republic? When I read a long winded article with underpinnings of bipartisanship and the author doesn’t even know what type of government we have I have to question the honesty of his words. But then what do I know. I’m just a surf to be protected by those who would know better what is good for me than myself.

Ty
Ty
1 year ago

How stupid are you? Yes, you, the Americans who voted for any Democrate in 2020 and again in midterm 2022. Think about this statement from Chuck Shermer:”We have a population that is not reproducing on its own with the same level that it used to,” Schumer said.This is related to a new DACA vote before the new congress sits in January 2023. These Democrates ran on Aboration. Now they complain that we need a greater population. His form of government murdered nearly 70 million Americans with an unconstitional abortion law. This is how stupid these Democrates, this government and the unelected government employees in the swamp think you are! So, just how stupid are you?

Ty
Ty
1 year ago

Truth has only one spelling. Lie has many!

Milt Morris
Milt Morris
1 year ago

The Democrats are liars alright. But there’s nothing noble about them.

Mike
Mike
1 year ago

If I recall, Ms. Clinton was Secretary of State, not Vice-President at the time of the Benghazi attack.

Kevin
Kevin
1 year ago

WOW! Touche’ Professor!

DF
DF
1 year ago

Corruption runs deep in the political swamp. Trump is just a businessman who exposed these lying cheating traitors.Anyone who doesn’t see the truth by now are either corrupted. scared, or ignorant.

jocko
jocko
1 year ago

libs ARE MUCH MORE THAN LIARS, they ARE PURE MALIGNANT CANCERS DESTROYING OUR NATION, THE FBI AND DOJ

Boz
Boz
1 year ago

They are satanic Iiars, spawned of the deviI.

Charles
Charles
1 year ago

They are not noble at all , its a power thing & the greed for power

Dee
Dee
1 year ago

Disregard NET, he/she is a TROLL.

Stephen Russell
Stephen Russell
1 year ago

No they just Lie day 1

Julie Wright
Julie Wright
1 year ago

Noble?? Absolutely not!!!
Liars?? YES! YES!! YES!!!

David Millikan
David Millikan
1 year ago

Get ready for Russian Volcanoes to ERUPT. The weather will change again from it proving more of Global Warming LIE.
They better Tax those volcanoes and put carbon emission limits on them.

anna hubert
anna hubert
1 year ago

If democrats “win” by cheating only there is nothing else to add That they do not allow the rules and laws says it all

Tikvah
Tikvah
1 year ago

How do you know when a Democrat is lying? Whenever he/she says anything.

William C Smith
William C Smith
1 year ago

There is nothing noble about lying.

Douglas C
Douglas C
1 year ago

Fellow Patriot Posters of AMAC,
STOP THIS NOW! Keep this site relevant for thoughtful discourse- not school yard invective. At the least we should try to keep the invective to a minimum. We are being not so slyly baited to rashly respond by agent provocateurs such as Net and Paddleguy. I have noticed this escalating trend in the Comments for about 2 months now. These interlopers (bot or first-person human) are not serious. Someone is being paid to do this. The obviously inflammatory name calling, covered with a few pseudo-facts for intellectual cover shouldn’t fool anyone. We are not afraid of reasoned debate, but this is not it. DO NOT waste your brain cells responding to these clowns. If you must, then down vote and move on.
Hope this isn’t taken as too preachy. I just enjoy this site too much to see it used by the bad guys.

B W
B W
1 year ago

NEVER MIND HOW MANY BALLETS go IN– IT IS WHO IS IN CHARGE OF COUNTING THE VOTES –as to who wins.
Just ask CCP Xi—– that is how he became the one and only CCP Dictator.-
Those late-night ballets counters – & some of the walking dead
–well, what can I say? A NEVADA RESIDENT FOR OVER 40 YEARS. 11/21/2022

HAPPY THANKSGIVING TO ALL —GOD BLESS US ALL!

VikkiC
VikkiC
1 year ago

Not noble liars…just liars…they can’t get away from it. They are addicted to never facing the truth, because no one holds their feet to the fire! Time for that to change!! Schiff should be struck by lightning…

Glen
Glen
1 year ago

Nothing “NOBLE” about people who cannot open their mouth without lying.
The current “puppet” administration is following the communist outline to the letter to destroy America and turn it into a satellite of China/Russia, and the US has a lot of useful IDIOTS helping them along.

Randall L. Beatty
Randall L. Beatty
1 year ago

There is many reasons why the Republicans did not do that well, but one main reason is the media and all the negative ads that were full of lies. Here in Wisconsin it was sick the way they trashed the Republicans running for office, the Dems will do anything to hold onto there seats but they did turn the House lets see what happens now.

Gloria
Gloria
1 year ago

Are they “noble” liars? They have no nobility in them at all. They are just liars, who are like their father, Satan, who comes to steal, kill and destroy. I pray that the House will do the job we need to have done and send Biden and his crime family to prison for the rest of their lives. Every time we need them to do what is necessary, they screw up. This will be our last chance to save this nation, unless Jesus returns.

johnh
johnh
1 year ago

Tucker Carlson (FOX) was raving Oct 27 that USA would run out of diesel in 25-days & thinks everybody should listen to what he says. Here it is 25 days later & US still has diesel. FOX needs to quit throwing out FAKE NEWS like this, they should do more homework & not knee-jerk reactions that a lot of people might believe. Okay Tucker, how many days of diesel do we have left today?????

William Hodge
William Hodge
1 year ago

Noble no, by no means. Notable yes, lies about everything and anything just to get the people used to incredible lies. To never tell the truth though just makes us mad.

johnh
johnh
1 year ago

It is wrong for Democrats to lie to Americans & we will remember when we vote. But the Republicans also do this & the worst one was Trump when he said in taped interview: ” I downplayed the Corona Virus because I did not want to panic American citizens”. That was a lame excuse from the leader of this country. And Trump denied saying many things even tho they were public on Twitter on taped on media. Both sides need to quit trying to fool American people with falsehoods.

johnh
johnh
1 year ago

Good quote from Patricia Heaton (actress) : “For those of you who are Christians & feel disappointed or despairing of the election results it is a blessing to be reminded that our security does not rest with men or governments which are finite & will eventually crumble, but in God alone who is ever sustaining.” From November 2022

John Riley
John Riley
1 year ago

Regardless of what is written here as long as the Democrats keep robbing Peter to pay Paul, Paul will vote for the Democrats. As usual follow the money.

lindylou
lindylou
1 year ago

there is no nobility in lying……period

Paddleguy
Paddleguy
1 year ago

What a ridiculous article. Trump has over 30,000 verified lies during his term and he continues to lie relentlessly, particularly about Biden’s 2020 victory. The article resurrects a bunch of silly right wing memes that have little relation to reality. Pelosi’s comment, as is well known, just meant that the American people would know all the benefits of the Affordable Care Act once it was passed. Her comment was for the American people, not Congress. The author is a professor and he knows full well his claim is nonsense.

An older blonde women laughing in the kitchen with a grey haired man.
AMAC’s Medicare Advisory Service
The knowledge, guidance, and choices of coverage you’re looking for. The exceptional service you deserve.
The AMAC App on 3 different iPhone
Download the AMAC App
The AMAC App is the place to go for insightful news wherever you are and whenever you want.
Joe Biden speaking with attendees
NEW YORK - OCT 10:American homeless sleeps in New York city subway on October 10 2009.A 2013 report show that the number of homeless people recorded in NYC topped 50,000 for the first time.
Former President of the United States Donald Trump speaking with attendees at the 2023 Turning Point Action Conference at the Palm Beach County Convention Center in West Palm Beach, Florida.
gen z and boomers; election - pick your side poster

Stay informed! Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter.

"*" indicates required fields

110
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Subscribe to AMAC Daily News and Games