Newsline

Elections , Newsline

Presidential Debates – 1980 and 2024

Posted on Monday, September 16, 2024
|
by AMAC, Robert B. Charles
|
18 Comments
|
Print

Just something to think about. Arguably, too much is being made of the Trump-Harris debate. Here is why. Polls and focus groups aside, this cycle is reminiscent of 1980, when Jimmy Carter – incumbent with high inflation, record interest, international crises, and doubts about competence – ran against Ronald Reagan, derided as an outspoken extremist, shoot-from-the-hip politician, sad generalist, and mere movie actor.

Look back at that year, and you see how many things we forget and should remember … now.  Perhaps strangely, the “Iran Hostage Crisis,” Iranian radicals seizing the US embassy for 444 days – eventually releasing them as Reagan was sworn in, fearful  – actually helped Jimmy Carter at first.

Helped him? Yes. Americans “rallied round the flag” – and around Carter – when Iran seized US citizens, threatening their welfare, sought to humiliate our nation. This perspective dominated primaries, allowing Carter to act presidential and sideline challenger Ted Kennedy (D-MA).

Carter’s larger strategy – which included a presidential debate one week before the 1980 election – was to frame Reagan as outside the norm, extreme in views, unhinged, over-the-top, too risky.

Many of the tactics used now against Trump were deployed then, attacking Reagan’s grasp of details, the tendency to be bold and uncompromising on key issues, too conservative, and “extreme.”

On the flip side, Carter – who came to office as a “change agent” after Watergate – tried to present himself as a continuing change agent, despite four years in office, eroding our national prestige.

Carter claimed to be a “healing” force, oozed compassion, spoke with great emotion, and said he was the realist, defender of the “middle class,” environment, and economy against big companies. He proposed higher taxes on oil companies, subsidies for solar and other alternatives, mandated wage and price controls to blunt inflation rooted in overspending, his attacks on oil, and bad foreign relations.

Net-net, the nation struggled with uncertainty about Reagan, a successful governor of California but not a president, and an incumbent who had the experience but had eroded the economy, triggering high inflation and interest, and hurting US leadership worldwide, from Afghanistan to NATO.

Polls rose and fell, but as the economy continued to slide and crises dragged on – especially in the Mideast – Carter accepted a debate with Reagan, a political risk but he had great detail command.

Here is the surprise. The two men debated days before the election – Reagan and Carter. Carter was a master of detail, spoke down to Reagan, waved his incumbency, offered untruths, and derided Reagan the actor. But Reagan did not lose his cool and offered big ideas, generalities, and persuasive realities.

Reagan was viewed by media pundits as having lost the debate. He was seen as outdebated by his scornful, mocking, highly derisive, and detail-focused opponent, a sitting president. In the first days after that debate, the consensus was Carter was the better debater, but that was not enough.

Why? Three reasons probably explain what happened after that debate – a decisive victory by Reagan, followed by Reagan recovering the economy, restabilizing the Mideast and Europe, bringing down the Soviet Union, and proving that he had a very real rapport with the American people.

First, the leadership potential Reagan represented, a hope based on what he had done in California, was ultimately more important than Carter’s superior command of detail and debate.

Second, Reagan’s authenticity, and clarity of his conviction in vital areas – faith in the private sector, small businesses, job creation, inflation, interest, affordable housing and energy, as well as in national security, foreign policy, public safety, and family priorities – took the cake.

Third, how Reagan held himself, with a degree of authority, not snideness or audacity, a sense of having lived much, struggled and overcome adversity, being attacked and survived, was a draw.

So, what does all this mean now – for Trump and Harris? More than most realize. History never repeats exactly, but people see what they see, and that is often not what the elites see. What the media says is secondary. Are debates of value? Yes. Do they often decide races, or does the number of assertions made, insults proffered, or energy really make the difference? Seldom.  Just something to think about.

Robert Charles is a former Assistant Secretary of State under Colin Powell, former Reagan and Bush 41 White House staffer, attorney, and naval intelligence officer (USNR). He wrote “Narcotics and Terrorism” (2003), “Eagles and Evergreens” (2018), and is National Spokesman for AMAC.

We hope you've enjoyed this article. While you're here, we have a small favor to ask...

The AMAC Action Logo

Support AMAC Action. Our 501 (C)(4) advances initiatives on Capitol Hill, in the state legislatures, and at the local level to protect American values, free speech, the exercise of religion, equality of opportunity, sanctity of life, and the rule of law.

Donate Now
Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
anna hubert
anna hubert
18 days ago

The voter than was more focused and informed than voter today. Also that huge component was not in . Social media and media in general far reaching and influencing . The ones who see around them what is going on and living in reality will not be influenced. But there are many who don’t give a hoot and believe all they hear and see on their devices. They’d be better off without them. Less brain washed.

Robert Zuccaro
Robert Zuccaro
18 days ago

Ah, the Good Old Days… when a $100 billion national debt was called a “crisis” and $1.00/gallon gas was too much!

Melinda
Melinda
18 days ago

Everything you say, Robert, rings true, with one difference that didn’t exist in 1980: social media, which provides instant reactions. Also, a plethora of broadcast networks that weren’t there. It will be interesting to find out the difference, although there as many other variables. I hope you’re right.

SCbubba
SCbubba
17 days ago

I’ve never needed interminable campaigns, conventions, faux “debates”, or rallies to make up my mind about political office candidates. I have sufficient strength of conviction based upon my life experiences, non-liberal-indoctrinated schooling, and professional employment such that I would NEVER vote for ANY liberal, DemocRAT, “progressive”, or “woke” candidate for ANY political office whether local, state, or federal.

JPop
JPop
18 days ago

I’ve just been dissatisfied with P- Debates these last few years. I want to see Townhall-style Debates where WE THE PEOPLE CAN them questions. p.s. I distrust the mainstream media.

johnh
johnh
16 days ago

Thanks for a great article. One comment, at that time both parties realized the importance of keeping the Federal Debt at a manageable level..

Kathy
Kathy
18 days ago

Oneof the differences between then and now is all the early voting. Even if they do have a late debate, many will have already voted for the wrong person and cannot change their vote.

Pat R
Pat R
18 days ago

Most Americans who pay attention witnessed the bias and rather obvious tell that Harris had been made privy to the questions to be asked. But her ‘word salads’ lacked real policy plans. I do believe Trump saw what was going on but didn’t handle it too well. And most Americans will root for the underdog, so to speak.

Fema.gov Disasters USA Government home page under magnifying glass.
Medicaid text sign on calculator with pills and money. Medicaid text calculatoron American paper money with pills and orange prescription bottle
Vote Here Sign and Line. Yellow sign with VOTE HERE is standing by a line of people wating to get to the polls in Arizona
Miner inside an underground gold and copper mine. Region del Maule, Chile - April 02, 2016: Miner inside the access tunnel of an underground gold and copper mine

Stay informed! Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter.

"*" indicates required fields

18
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Subscribe to AMAC Daily News and Games