Chat with us, powered by LiveChat
AMAC In The Media / Politics

Making Energy Less Affordable for Seniors

‘Obama’s attack on coal raises the cost of staying warm’

By – Dan Weber

If the Obama White House had a secret plan to emasculate America by making the country more dependent on foreign oil and federal bureaucracy, and if the president’s means to that end involved creating greater uncertainty across U.S. energy markets and fear of climate change with no chance for a lifeline from the Keystone XL pipeline, oil drilling, fracking or clean coal, it could not be doing a better job. The plan is working. Fear and dependence appear on the rise; optimism and self-reliance on the wane.

Let’s go one level deeper and pick an issue — clean coal. This White House has effectively begun turning the clock backward, choking off America’s supply and raising energy costs, and no issue more symbolizes this than coal. Every administration member from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) chief to the secretary of state has President Obama’s “coal is bad” talking points.

What about the facts, though? Ronald Reagan once said “facts are stubborn things,” and so they are. Like it or not, coal’s transformation is an American success story — an industry cleaning and growing despite a hostile government. Today, U.S. coal plants produce 60 percent fewer emissions than they did in 1970. Coal-fired power plants emit 90 percent fewer emissions than the plants they replace.

Yet, despite major advances in air and water clarity, strong production, job prospects and relief to Americans through lower energy prices, Mr. Obama’s EPA continues to pound this industry.

Here is why this approach hurts. Many older Americans live on fixed incomes. They may not feel the Obama EPA’s drag on the job market, although their children and grandchildren will. They may not recognize the improvements in air and water quality, since these are often hard to measure. However, they will feel the spike in their energy costs. Put bluntly, with winter coming on — Mr. Obama’s climate change notwithstanding — America’s seniors will be hammered by higher energy prices. Threats to coal are one big reason.

Unless the next Congress stops the pending EPA regulations, many older Americans, veterans and widows, retired and pension-dependent Americans, will find that they are facing unconscionably higher costs for heat and electricity. Specifically, the EPA plans a 30 percent reduction in carbon-dioxide emissions by 2030, with mandated reductions to that point. While this sounds innocuous, it is not. Coal generates 41 percent of the nation’s electricity. The costs associated with artificially accelerating plant replacement and turning emissions into a bogeyman for climate change are high. Estimates of the adverse impact on America’s oldest demographic are arresting. While they vary, all suggest a major bite out of fixed incomes for those least able to afford it.

There’s more. Mr. Obama’s anti-coal stance is like taking a stance against geography, population growth or weather, most of which occurs outside the United States and is beyond our control. What Mr. Obama decides to do with fringe carbon-dioxide emissions between now and 2030 will have minimal effect on the larger emission problem. Most coal emissions are not from advanced U.S. plants, but from older Chinese, Indian and other foreign coal plants. Even Europe is burning more coal these days in an attempt to escape dependence on Russian natural gas and hold down surging electricity prices.

Here is a dose of reality for the Obama White House: Fossil fuels remain the backbone of the global economy, and will for the foreseeable future. While we all wish for an increase in renewable options and cleaner air, the incremental benefit that will flow from imposing draconian changes on U.S. plants will disproportionately penalize older Americans while adding little or nothing to reduce global emissions.

In fact, current Obama restrictions on coal are already elevating prices nationwide. The U.S. Energy Information Administration just reported that electricity costs rose by 3 percent nationally last year, while New England — being pushed away from coal — saw electricity prices jump by more than 11 percent.

Let’s rethink all this — and if Mr. Obama refuses to, then let us ask a new Congress to do so. Let’s reward those who make good industry decisions by modernizing their plants rather than penalize them. Let’s encourage the world to come to the current U.S. standard before we emasculate another important U.S. industry. Let’s use common sense and protect the scarce, fixed and hard-earned resources of older Americans, not compel them to pay higher prices for no logical reason.

As Mr. Obama, Secretary of State John F. Kerry and EPA chief Gina McCarthy fly about the country and world in their fuel-guzzling jets, let’s remember who is really paying those bills — those who have saved a lifetime just to be safe, warm and secure in older age, and who are less interested in the president’s latest public relations blitz than in fidelity to stubborn facts. Clean coal is no curse, foil or sleight-of-hand. It is an accomplishment, the product of sequential industry commitments and a source of American strength. Another source of American strength is our older generation, and we should not forget them — especially this winter — when energy prices may be expected to spike again under pressure from Mr. Obama’s EPA.

Dan Weber is founder and president of the Association of Mature American Citizens.

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Sign Up Today
Read more articles by Daniel C. Weber

7
Leave a Reply

6 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
7 Comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Norm

Oil, gas,, natural gas, and propane have doubled and in the case of propane, tripled. Obama is out to change the fabric of our country!! its becoming a cesspool of non-moral views and laws. Lying is the norm. changing the laws to suit his whim has become normal. Gotta stop this guy and his cronies!!!

Carl Koch

This is no exaggeration. My wife and I lived in a rural area of Northeast Texas. We got our electricity from a co-op electric provider. When we moved into our 2100 square foot mobile home, we were paying about 300-350 a month during the hottest months (over 100°). Last year ( 8 years later) we were paying 750-800 a month for the same electricity. We were told our bills next summer could hit 1200-1500 a month. We were told the cost of buying electricity from producers had tripled. Unconscionable? You bet. We moved into Dallas. Our apartment (1200 sq ft) costs us 150-160- a month through a level billing electric provider. It will only get worse. Mr Obama and others of his ilk care not about the damage and pain they are causing. They have an agenda. The people and the country be damned.

Ivan Berry

I gotta hand it to Mr. Weber, D.A., and PaulE. They have done a great service in this article and comments.
This alone was well worth the wait and having joined AMAC in the first place. Well done, guys.
Every thing you three have said is the absolute truth as regards the absolutists of the movement, the administration and the EPA.
Now, let’s get on with the business of trying to get rid of administrative law so that Congress can get on with doing what the Constitution tells them is their sole responsibility. It still comes back to Congress being the major culpret.

PaulE

One of the major constituencies of the Democrat party is the environmental movement. Most of these groups are little more than convenient fronts for various socialist / communist members pushing the Utopian socialist vision, by wrapping it up in pleasant sounding, well-meaning environmental terms that sound so benign to the public. Throw in a few pictures of Bambi, polar bears and baby seals and the money just flows in from the public. Most people have no idea what they are financing with their contributions. To assume the agenda of the environmental movement is about the environment, clean water or clean air is to miss their entire objective. D.A.’s description of them as “the church of Gaia” and only thinking in absolutist terms is 100 percent accurate. The EPA is largely nothing more than the enforcement arm for the environmental movement, as the agency is filled with Progressives dedicated to environmental… Read more »

D.A.

Mr. Weber; hats off to you for starting AMAC and thanks for a reasonable article. The problem is that the ruling crowd is not reasonable and are playing from their own deck of cards. That deck of cards has a lot more than four aces. Here’s why: the presidents base is made up of the welfare class, young people and demented liberals. The first two groups don’t pay their own bills and are neutral or in favor of getting rid of coal. The latter group are people who are incapable of common sense when quasi religious topics like the environment come up. The only way for them to reach a state of grace in the church of Gaia is to think in absolutist terms. Coal and oil are bad and need to be banished. The fact that there are currently no viable replacements matters not to them. So, the president… Read more »

Emily Huffman

Well stated, all I can add it how imperative it is to get out there to vote!!!!!! We are the only line of defense to save America the Beautiful.