By Lee Habeeb –
It was January 18, 2009, and 500,000 people huddled in the cold to watch a concert on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial two days before the inauguration of Barack Obama. They were treated to the words of some of our great actors and musical artists, people such as Tom Hanks, Denzel Washington, Beyoncé, and Bono. They were even treated to words from the president-elect himself.
As the event came to a close, Pete Seeger and Bruce Springsteen led the crowd in a rendition of Woody Guthrie’s “This Land Is Your Land,” a song most of us think we know, but don’t — a song we love, although we might not if we knew why the song was written and what the song is really about.
And what the man who wrote the song was about, too.
What most Americans don’t know is that Guthrie didn’t like Irving Berlin’s “God Bless America” and wrote “This Land Is Your Land” as a rebuttal.
What most Americans also don’t know is that Guthrie didn’t like his own country and wanted to fundamentally transform it along the lines of his heroes, Marx and Lenin.
And what most Americans had never heard until that day in Washington, D.C., was a stanza that is typically left out of public presentations of “This Land Is Your Land” because it is so radical. The lines are as radical as the writer himself, who dedicated his life to the overthrow of capitalism and private-property rights.
Hope and change were in the air that cold winter day, and Seeger and Springsteen figured it was time for America to hear the rarely performed stanza.
There was a big high wall there that tried to stop me,
A great big sign there said, “private property”;
But on the back side, it didn’t say nothin’;
That side was made for you and me.
No wonder we’ve never heard that stanza. It changes Guthrie’s song from a celebration of America into a bitter indictment of a nation built on unjust private-property rights.
It’s odd that Springsteen made this choice. He lives in Rumson, N.J., a Jersey Shore enclave where the average home goes for a working-class price of $1 million. Springsteen also owns a 200-plus-acre New Jersey farm that he uses as a tax dodge. Add to the mix his intellectual-property catalogue, which generates millions in royalties each year, and the Boss is one of the wealthiest property owners in America.
But back to Woody Guthrie, and — as the late Paul Harvey liked to say — the rest of the story. This is the story you didn’t hear this past weekend during the endless encomiums to Guthrie as the Left celebrated his 100th birthday.
As Will Kaufman points out in his book Woody Guthrie, American Radical, the folksinger was not driven by progressive abstractions; he dedicated every part of his life to promoting economic, social, and racial equality for all, and he did so by pushing for a dramatic transformation of America itself.
For Guthrie, Kaufman explains, it was all about the proletariat and bettering the condition of the average worker. “I never sing nor play one single word or note that is not for the help of the working classes to know more, feel better, rise up, and to own and control this world that they have built,” Guthrie said.
But it was the means to that end that made Guthrie a radical. He wanted America to follow the Soviet model of government ownership of the means of production, wherein central planners and bureaucrats distribute the wealth for all workers to enjoy.
Along with the thousands of songs Guthrie wrote, he penned columns under the title “Woody Sez” for the People’s World and the Daily Worker, both papers published by the Communist Party USA. And although there is no evidence that he ever joined the Communist Party — Guthrie was too much of a vagabond and general crank to join a club that would accept him as a member — he even managed to shower Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin with praise.
Guthrie was the first musical icon of the 20th century to make it cool to sing songs about the workers’ revolution, ushering in the later tunes of Phil Ochs; Joan Baez; Billy Bragg; Jackson Browne; Crosby, Stills and Nash; Green Day; and the Clash.
Guthrie was protest music’s Che Guevera; his weapons were a pen and guitar, not a gun.
Kaufman’s book chronicles Guthrie’s close ties to Communist Party activists, and the frustration he encountered studying Marxism. Guthrie couldn’t get past the theoretical nature of the material. In his copy of Lenin’s Theory of the Agrarian Question he scribbled a note that he wished he could “make all the thoughts of Marx and Engels and Lenin and Stalin and Wilkie and Roosevelt and Earl Browder fly down and roost in my brain.”
But despite his difficulties understanding the texts, Guthrie was committed to bringing the work of Karl Marx to the general public. Indeed, in his personal copy of Capital, he wrote: “Will memorize contents in a week or so. . . . I’d like to try to write all of these things down in short words.”
If only Guthrie had studied the Pilgrims’ experiment with collectivism, he could have saved a lot of time. He would have learned that we gave Marxism the college try back in Plymouth, Mass., and things didn’t end well.
In the early years of the Pilgrim experiment, the community farmed and harvested as a collective. No one owned the livestock or the land they tilled. But, as the Pilgrims soon learned, when no one owns anything, everyone owns nothing, because nothing gets done.
The crop yield dropped to a dangerous low, and the animal-husbandry operation nearly failed. Most people think that the Pilgrims suffered primarily from tough weather and tougher land conditions. But what really threatened their lives was bad public policy based on a bad idea.
Because of “community ownership,” the hardworking Pilgrims were compelled to subsidize the lazy Pilgrims, and the lazy Pilgrims had no incentive to put in an honest day’s work, because they could profit from the work of others.
It was an Occupy Wall Street moment long before the birth of our nation.
As you can imagine, the idea of spreading the wealth around didn’t sit well with the more diligent Pilgrims. Why bother to toil, only to have the fruits of your labor passed along to those who don’t lift a finger?
Collectivism soon pitted Pilgrim against Pilgrim and spawned a class warfare of sorts: the working class versus the slackers.
William Bradford’s history of the colony recounts that all of that common ownership had the effect of demoralizing the community. The industrious Pilgrim, Bradford noted, “had no more in division of victuals and clothes” than the idle Pilgrim did.
Luckily for the locals, the leaders at Plymouth took action. They didn’t appoint a commission to study why the slackers were slacking, and they didn’t create a tax regime to punish the worker-bee Pilgrims.
The leaders had a better idea. What if everyone owned the land they worked and kept the fruits of their labor?
That epiphany changed the course of American history. Here is how Bradford described the change in policy in the spring of 1623:
And so assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number, for that end, only for present use (but made no division for inheritance) and ranged all boys and youth under some family.
And there it ended, the American experiment with collectivism.
When these settlers became responsible for their own little piece of the Plymouth Rock, things got better fast. Crop yields grew, and livestock population increased. The region started to hum with the kind of work ethos we’ve come to expect from weather-seasoned New Englanders.
In that same history recorded by Bradford, he described the results of this paradigm shift from “community ownership” to private property: “This had very good success, for it made all hands very industrious.”
If only Woody Guthrie had spent more time reading American history and less time trying to master Lenin and Marx, his music — and his sad life — might have turned out differently.
Kaufman noted that Guthrie the idealistic Marxist developed a bitter side and sometimes struck a militant chord. The final verse of Guthrie’s ballad “Jesus Christ” suggests that one day the workers will finally lose patience and put the blame where it belongs: “ ’Twould be better for you rich if you’d never been born. For you have laid Jesus Christ in his grave.”
So much for turning the other cheek. Guthrie in this grim song took the violence he believed was inherent in capitalism and turned it back on the ruling propertied class. This verse exists only on paper because no known recording of Guthrie singing it exists. Perhaps he had the good sense not to sing what he really felt, knowing that the American public, even many of his progressive friends, would reject such bitterness.
Perhaps even he understood just how ugly the verse sounded.
So the next time you hear “This Land Is Your Land,” think about those lines you never heard in the song, and about the “Jesus Christ” song Guthrie never recorded.
Think about our latest incarnation of Guthrie, Bruce Springsteen, and all of that property he owns.
Think about those pragmatic Pilgrims and their short-lived experiment with collectivism.
And thank God for the Constitution, which protects our property rights from radicals old and new who are hell-bent on transforming the country we love.
— Lee Habeeb is the vice president of content at Salem Radio Network, which syndicates Bill Bennett, Mike Gallagher, Dennis Prager, Michael Medved, and Hugh Hewitt. He lives in Oxford, Miss., with his wife, Valerie, and daughter, Reagan.
VERY GOOD ARTICLE, IT WOULD BE NICE IF EVERYONE IN THE USA COULD READ IT.
KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK
Excellent article. These types of articles should be like a magnet to attract a larger membership in AMAC. When I forward the recently received email about membership to friends and relatives I will forward a link to this excellent and enlightening article. I guess I was born with some great intuition for I’ve always sensed the underlying theme of “This Land is Our Land” as being socialistic in message and intent. At age 78 now, I look back and see how fortunate I was to “see the political light” at age 26 and have been conservative ever since. I look forward to future essays from Lee Habeeb based on the excellence of this one. Thanks so much to AMAC for enlisting such good commentators in their newsletters.
Very excellent article!!
“The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations from the
beginning of history, has been about 200 years. During those 200
years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:
From bondage to spiritual faith;
From spiritual faith to great courage;
From courage to liberty;
From liberty to abundance;
From abundance to complacency;
From complacency to apathy;
From apathy to dependence;
From dependence back into bondage.”
There is a lot of information in this piece , most of which has zero importance. The important part is that our enemies are not hiding in the woodwork waiting for an opportunity to pounce. They are and have been open and vocal about their hatred for the American people and their contempt for the values most people hold dear. One possible solution to these enemies is for us to quit taking a knife to a gunfight. We must attack them with the same energy and disgust that they have been so successful with. If you are sick of the mainstream media quit buying papers and quit watching biased news. Open defiance and refusing to comply with government dictates that we know are wrong is the only way we have of saying no
Extremely enlightning article. It should be required reading for all students studying the history of our country. How have we gotten so far from the outstanding thoughts that established our great country – America. We all need to do everything possible this November to redirect our politicians!!!
When I think back on my history lessons in school I always thought something was missing. In schools today we know something is missing but, yet, we spend most taxpayer dollars on it and continue to seek more. If we knew ‘the rest of the story’ we would be stunned about many things that are hushed up or lied about. The socialist media will be responsible for the destruction of this great country.
Woody Guthrie was raised dirt poor because his parents had a terrible marriage and his father left when he was a little boy. Just goes to show you how important it is to have a solid marriage and a father in the picture.
Why aren’t more articles like this brought to the public!!!!! As an 82 year old I do remember when U>S> History was
taught (in Chicago) , and especially remember the collectivism – although it didn’t seem the word collectivism was
predominant. No more of “this land”.
My guess is going to be Tuesday, April 5th. Very excited for you. It is such wordenful blessing. Take care and keep us updated. LOL (Longtime reader and lurker of your blog and your sister’s. )
Interesting information usable in discussions (confrontations).
What a fantastic job. well written, I only wish everyone could read and understand it. Many of our liberal friends either don’t read or can’t read,or do not understand what is written. Most are living in the moment and only care about themselves.
I’m 70 years old and very aware of how history has been perverted in our public schools. Back “in the day” we learned history pretty straight for the most part, but I don’t remember learning about the Pilgrims’ collectivism experiment. And Teddy Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson and FDR were heroes, not bigoted socialists. It has taken a long time for the perversion to seep into all aspects of history, but I believe that it is very widespread now. My son is 36 years old, and I am just now finding out some the things that he was taught. It’s appalling!
Interesting – I had read this story before, but it was with the settlers of Jamestown trying the collectivism. Obviously it happened at some point in the history of the settlement of this country.
Both Jamestown and The Pilgrims tried the collectivism and they both failed. Look it up.
A socialist wants everything and everybody to be free. Read the Secular Humanist Manifesto II on the internet. May your eyes be opened just a little bit further.
It matters who defines freedom. Thank God there was no pot of other people’s money at Plymouth Rock, so that the settlers had no choice but to allow socialism to die a natural death.
Excellant article! We know how insidious and subtle the socialist’s work. The big picture here is the shift toward the USA joining a One world government. We are very close to losing our soveriegnty. If we continue to let socialists get into high office we are going to be a UN slave collective along with the rest of the world. I say we should vet our candidates fully and find out if they are socialist sleepers who all of a sudden wake up when they get elected to office. The 2 party system in America is broken. There is a great way to fix it but the partys involved won’t give an inch to compromise.
Until you know, remember and learn from our history you cannot know, plan, and provide for your future. Please share with those you love and help them understand what is at stake.
Well written and informative. Thanks!
As a ‘history buff’ I really, really liked your article. Didn’t know this. And to think that we occasionally sing that song in church on the 4th of July. Thank you for the history lesson.
Very good article, I have been studying Country/Western, old rock and roll and Folk music all my life and I never realized the facts brought out.
Thank you for a very informative article, Mr. Geisler. For the rest of you bloggers, I recommend you obtain a copy of Curtis Bowers’ DVD movie AGENDA. This movie is dynamite, and it will clarify many of the reasons we find ourselves in our current economic and political mess. Bowers did a good job of researching, and he connects the dots. This DVD is well worthwhile. You may find information about the video at AgendaDocumentary.com. And, NO I am not making money on this nor do I have any vested interest in it other than to inform others.
Watch out for the UN and Agenda 21. I believe it to be a threat to private property ownership.
You are exactly right about Agenda 21, which has been flying under the radar for years. Also the LOST treaty, which is now being discussed that will turn over control of our oceans to the UN, and the UN Convetion on the Rights of the Child (which was changed to the Rights of the Disabled to hide its true intent) which will give them control over our childeren. Of course the one soon to be up for Obama’s signature will the the arms treaty, which is about control, not safety. The UN has never done anything for the US, but we want to put ourselves under their control. Stay on your congressmen.
Never too old to learn. I will soon be 88 and I will never sing this song again now that I know “the rest of the story”.: Thank you, thank you for all this enlightenment. Actually there was always something that bothered me about the words but I liked the melody. We take pride in our country, not what is ours for a fleeting time.