Government Watch / Politics

Goodbye Affirmative Action, Hello Individual Freedom and Dignity

Action

The Supreme Court just heard arguments in the case Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina.

It’s about affirmative action — universities using race and ethnicity in their admissions policies.

Students for Fair Admissions argues that both universities violate the U.S. Constitution in their discriminatory admissions policies. They discriminate against Asian Americans in favor of Whites, Blacks and Hispanics and unlawfully discriminate to achieve diversity that could be achieved in a race-neutral fashion.

Consensus is that Students for Fair Admissions will win this case and racial discrimination in university admission programs will be gone.

The decision will likely overturn Grutter v. Bollinger, which, in 2003, authorized universities to discriminate as an input factor in pursuit of diversity goals.

This will be a victory for those who see affirmative action as a mistake of the civil rights movement, inconsistent with its goals and the Constitution.

Let’s recall again the words of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in his great “I Have a Dream Speech” in 1963. “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”

Next year it will be 60 years since that speech. Would King have thought that more than a half-century after he spoke those words that we would be still so far from that dream?

One reason is the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the crown jewel of the movement King led.

The act went way beyond the goal of making discrimination illegal. It was constructed to use government as the means to achieve a just society.

The Equal Employment Opportunities Commission was created, and the door opened for affirmative action, quotas and the acceptance of the principle that it is lawful to discriminate in favor of certain racial groups to achieve social justice.

Not long after came the categorization of the whole American population into racial groups.

By the 1970s, the entire U.S. population was classified by race and ethnicity through a new racial code called Statistical Directive 15.

We were no longer just Americans. Now every American is formally categorized as White, Black, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander and American Indian/Alaskan Native.

Why? We entered a new era in which it was assumed that government force and action were needed achieve social justice, and toward this end, every citizen needed to be put in a racial or ethnic category.

King might as well have said, “I have dream that one day we will categorize every American according to their race and ethnicity and government will use this as basis to decide who should have what.”

In the oral arguments in the case against Harvard and UNC, Justice Clarence Thomas questioned what diversity means and achieves. “I’ve heard the word diversity quite a few times, and I don’t have a clue what it means. It seems to mean everything for everyone.”

The diversity that really produces benefit in education is diversity of opinion, and Harvard has virtually none. In the most recent annual survey that the Harvard Crimson does of the university faculty of Arts and Science, more than 80% self-identified as “liberal” or “very liberal.” Only 1% self-identified as “conservative” and zero as “very conservative.”

Chief Justice John Roberts got to the heart of the matter when he observed in Parents Involved v. Seattle in 2007, “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.”

The good news is the Supreme Court seems ready to start turning this around. With the court finding discrimination in college admissions unconstitutional, we’ll be taking a major step to restore individual freedom and dignity and end the demeaning, dehumanizing idea of reducing individuals to racial and ethnic categories.

Star Parker is president of the Center for Urban Renewal and Education and host of the weekly television show “Cure America with Star Parker.”

COPYRIGHT 2022 CREATORS.COM


If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!


Subscribe
Notify of
25 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Peter
2 months ago

WTF? I never heard that whites are a preference over Asian Americans! Whites are never listed as a category in affirmative action!

Bill
2 months ago
Reply to  Peter

newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/at-trial-harvards-asian-problem-and-a-preference-for-white-students-from-sparse-country

RyansDad
2 months ago

The court should go full Constitution and state that racial quotas ARE racial discrimination and are therefore unconstitutional! Further, they should outlaw the mention of race in any and all kinds of records. Photos in such records are legitimate, but the category, race, should be eliminated!!

Mary Ellen
2 months ago
Reply to  RyansDad

Please tell me why photos are legitimate.

Huey6367
2 months ago

Can we stop using the made up words race, racism, racist, et. al? We are all the same race with different colored skin.

John
2 months ago

No Red Wave. But that doesn’t discourage me. Politics are like baseball. You play hard win all you can. Learn from your losses.

Steve Bocklage
2 months ago

Thank you Star for your excellent article and insight.

Marla
2 months ago

Perhaps it would be best to not list sex, race and perhaps names on applications but a generic number of some kind in hopes of not being able
to do anything but admit the most qualified applicants.

Mishelle
2 months ago
Reply to  Marla

That’s exactly what I said. Need to keep all personal info out and eligibility info only.

David Naughton
2 months ago
Reply to  Marla

I was thinking the same thing. Maybe applications to college or work places should submit resumes or CVs without names and addresses on them, just a number or alpha-numeric identifier. The document details would be the only deciding factor regarding eligibility.

ReneeM.
2 months ago
Reply to  David Naughton

I agree so much it should be wiped out in the academic world as well as in employment. My husband was passed over several times for a promotion. There could have been no other reason than he’s white and male. He has years more seniority and way more working knowledge and helps other people when they ask him. These ladies can’t answer any questions about the work at all. When they do they usually give wrong information which causes errors and sometimes causes accounts to be written off instead of collected, thus costing the company money. One had only been there six months and couldn’t do the job correctly at all. But because of her race and being female she got the job.

Kat
2 months ago
Reply to  Marla

That sounds like an appropriate solution to me.

Rich
2 months ago

Along with affirmative action they need to get rid of the welfare state (War on Poverty) that has cost taxpayers billions of dollars and done more harm than good.

Mishelle
2 months ago
Reply to  Rich

Ding ding ding.Created nothing but lazy and entitlement attitude.

Robin W Boyd
2 months ago

The more hateful Progressives can divide US, the more they have control over US. To be truly free from oppression, we must be united as American citizens first. Ethnic identity is a social issue that we must not let government control.

William Boylan
2 months ago
Reply to  Robin W Boyd

Profound in its simplicity, the evasive truth.

Rebecca Reed
2 months ago

In the article stating race categories white is written with a small “w”. The rest have captitals. Is this an error? If so please correct. To discuss discrimination and then write “white” small w and then continue next to it “Black” capital b is in itself discrimination.

Mamajae
2 months ago
Reply to  Rebecca Reed

They must have corrected it since your comment because I went back 2x to see that error.

Rik
2 months ago

Affirmative Action MUST Die or CHANGE to Affirmative Action for WHITE PEOPLE!

George
2 months ago

I Am an American.PERIOD

Ed
2 months ago
Reply to  George

Unfortunately even as an “American” which infers being a citizen trying to realize the American Dream, it has become questionable as to what benefit that status has other than getting taxed for everyone else’s freebies and handouts or to buy votes.

Patriot Will
2 months ago

Affirmative Action is racist, and those who support favored policies for certain people based on skin color, to artificially boost the blacks to a higher socio- economic status, are highly misguided. America is a fair society that encourages hard work and accomplishments. To give rewards to certain groups of people based on their identities encourages favoritism and entitlement. Favoritism and entitlement are significant enemies of our Constitutional Republic.

anna hubert
2 months ago
Reply to  Patriot Will

It is more than racist it is demeaning and automatically admitting or assuming that certain segment of the population is not intellectually up to the task that there is not an outrage speaks volumes

Cliff Kachur
2 months ago
Reply to  Patriot Will

Thank you, Patriot Will. It is nice to know thrre is at least one that knows we have a Constitutional Republic, NOT a Democracy.

RyansDad
2 months ago
Reply to  Cliff Kachur

There are at least three, Patriot Will, you

25
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x