Election Coverage / Government Watch / Politics

Fight for Senate Control Down to Five States

from – Roll Call – by Stuart Rothenberg

With six weeks to go, the fight for control of the Senate is down to five states, four of them currently held by Democrats.

Republicans must win only two of those contests to guarantee the 51 seats they need to control the Senate for the last two years of Barack Obama’s presidency. And they need to win only one of the Democratic states if they hold the only GOP seat at serious risk.

While things could still change — and national polls continue to show an environment that may produce a substantial GOP wave in the House and Senate — the Senate battle has boiled down to two reliably red states and three swing states.

While you can find Democrats spinning a yarn about how their party could pull off an upset in a multi-candidate race in South Dakota, that state, plus West Virginia and Montana, look poised to flip to the GOP in November.

Two Southern Democrats, Arkansas’ Mark Pryor and Louisiana’s Mary L. Landrieu, have run aggressive races as they try to survive the Republican wave that has swept over their states during the past four years. But Arkansas Republican Rep. Tom Cotton has finally opened up a small but decisive lead in his race, a lead likely to grow in the coming weeks.

The Louisiana contest will probably go to a December runoff, and while runoffs are unpredictable, the almost certain GOP alternative to Landrieu in that race, Republican Rep. Bill Cassidy, has the advantage.

If they win both races, Republicans need to net only one more seat to win Senate control, with the focus, at least right now, on Alaska, North Carolina, Colorado, Iowa and Kansas.

Mark Begich is widely credited with running the best Democratic race in the country, and he may be ahead of challenger Dan Sullivan by a couple of points. But Begich remains well under the 50 percent mark, and Alaska’s strongly Republican bent means the senator has no room for error.

Local observers are wondering whether a controversial TV spot aired by Begich’s campaign may have backfired, and the closer Election Day gets, the more difficult it may be for Begich to keep voters’ focus on the state rather than on Obama or the stakes for control of the Senate.

North Carolina is proving to be a major headache for the GOP. Not nearly as red as Alaska — Obama carried it narrowly in 2008 before losing it narrowly in 2012 — Republican challenger Thom Tillis appears to be trailing Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan by more than a couple of points.

Democrats have poured resources into this race, and by November they are likely to have out-spent Tillis, the National Republican Senatorial Committee and GOP-allied groups by $7 million.

Democratic attacks definitely hurt the challenger, particularly on education, and many Republicans are growing skeptical that Tillis can overtake the incumbent. At some point, the NRSC may have to decide whether to stay in the race or pull out. But for now, Hagan’s weakness, the state’s competitiveness and the president’s unpopularity keep this contest in play.

Colorado remains extremely competitive, and Democrats must be concerned their attacks on Gardner on cultural issues did not destroy his campaign. But Gardner’s positive personality and more moderate message, combined with a Udall fumble here and there, has clearly made this a key contest.

You don’t have to believe the recent Quinnipiac University Poll that showed the Republican nominee with a double-digit lead in the state’s gubernatorial race and Gardner ahead by 8 points (I certainly don’t) to believe Udall is in great danger.

Some observers seem to think Democratic Rep. Bruce Braley has grabbed the momentum in Iowa. But while Democrats obviously have stopped the bleeding in the Hawkeye State, the contest certainly looks like a tossup. That may be different from six weeks ago, when Republican Joni Ernst appeared to have the momentum, but it’s also very different than a year ago, when Democrats were oozing confidence in Braley.

The fifth decisive race looks to be Kansas, where Republican Sen. Pat Roberts appears to be trailing independent Greg Orman by anywhere from a couple of points to a half-dozen.

Roberts has not run a good race, and his lack of a residence in the state is a dumb mistake. But questions about Orman’s relationship with a jailed businessman could help Roberts alter the contest’s trajectory. More importantly, given the state’s strong GOP bent and Obama’s unpopularity, all Roberts must do is nationalize the Senate race. That shouldn’t be impossible.

Still, if Orman wins (and caucuses with Democrats, as almost everyone seems to expect), that result in itself could cause Republicans to fall short in their bid to win back the Senate.

There are other contests, of course.

Two Democratic women hoping to pick off GOP seats, Alison Lundergan Grimes in Kentucky and Michelle Nunn in Georgia, look to be in roughly the same place. Neither of those contests is over now, but both Democrats continue to face uphill fights.

In Kentucky, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has opened up a small but clear lead over Grimes, and the state’s strongly anti-Obama bent makes things harder for her with so little time left.

Georgia Republican David Perdue has a small lead over Nunn, and unlike McConnell, Perdue has never been tested, so he could make a mistake in the final furious weeks of the campaign. But he will win if he is error-free.

New Hampshire Democrat Jeanne Shaheen has seen her advantage shrink but continues to hold a narrow lead over challenger Scott P. Brown. The former Massachusetts senator still needs a big Republican wave to be swept to victory. Michigan GOP nominee Terri Lynn Land looks to be in even worse shape.

Republican nominees in Minnesota, Oregon and Virginia probably need divine intervention to have any chance of winning.

My ratings continue to reflect Republican Senate gains most likely in the five to eight seat range, with the eventual outcomes in the five most crucial contests likely to determine Senate control in 2015.

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Billy R.Reavis
8 years ago

I too am about to change my registration to independent, for the same reasons as the gentleman above. I going to join Amac this week, and I need some info on some kind of Medicare Advantage ins. or ‘something?. I have been a Republican for all of my life (I am 73). I have never voted for a Democrat and I have never regretted it. Now I am looking for Americans because both parties are failing to represent the people.Thom Tillis had McCain, Graham, and the “fat cat’ from Jersey down here pushing Carl Rove’s agenda for another gift to the Democratic party. May I ask a question? WHO GAVE THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BACK TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? Why are those people slammed by the elites of the party when they have proven they can deliver. and after this Obamacare crap even more would join them. I believe that is a “no brainer”. More is better on election day. I watched Carl Rove’s ranting on Fox news during the last election. And they continued to have this Big Gov.pawn pretending to be a conservative ??? If we don’t get somebody who is a “Real American” our military our healthcare, and our nation may not survive! If God does not help us and intervene for us it may be over this time around. thanks, Bill

Randy Watts
8 years ago

I am predicting another “stay at home on Election Day” surprise for the GOP in November, just like Romney experienced in 2012. Why should folks vote for candidates who belong to a party that has given the public no platform or plan of what it will do if it controls the Congress. Further, a party that won’t challenge a black President taking unconstitutional actions because it fears criticism from the mainstream media.

We now can be certain that all the Republican members of Congress are interested in is getting reelected, and to hell with the country or the needs of the voters!

The GOP is inviting, no welcoming, a third party to give American conservatives a voice in their government. I for one am ready to join a conservative party and this lifelong Republican has reregistered as an Independent to welcome one when it is formed!

8 years ago

So with six weeks to go before crucial midterm elections, the standard GOP strategy of “Don’t take a definitive stand (not the luke-warm sound bites usually delivered) on any of the major issues or push back too hard against false charges by your Democrat opponent for fear of potentially alienating mythical “swing voters”, all in the hope of “riding a wave to victory in the polls” by simply being quiet is playing out pretty much the same as it always does. What could have been easily a landslide election for the GOP by picking up almost all the Senate seats up for election this year, has turned into a last minute nail-biter. When will the GOP leadership ever learn?

Given the weak state of the economy, Obamacare’s broken promises and rising costs, a national defense and foreign policy that is completely incoherent by any reasonable standards, the Republican candidates should be ahead in virtually every Congressional race. That is if there was am aggressive, unified, focused message being delivered consistently by the GOP nationwide. Instead we have the standard national campaign strategy of “Be quiet. Don’t offend anyone and hope the people are so sick of the Democrats that they just reflexively vote Republican.” That’s working so well, yet again, that we’re looking to just squeak by come November.

So once again it falls to us the average nobodies, who actually love this country and what it used to stand for before Progressives started their assault on this nation’s founding principles over 100 years ago, to try and get out the vote. All because the GOP leadership is afraid that if they provide too stark a contrast to the socialism pushed by the Democrats, they will offend some people that wouldn’t vote Republican no matter how Democrat-lite the GOP leadership re-made the Party to be. We’re just the people who don’t want this country to commit national suicide and sink into the cesspool of socialism, simply because it is the politically correct thing to do according to our leaders Washington. What’s wrong with this picture Mr. Rothenberg?

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x