Home & Family / Veterans News

Desire to End Military Remarriage Penalty for Surviving Spouses

militaryA spouse of someone in the military is eligible to receive a variety of benefits designed to protect themselves and their family. For example, if a person serving in the military dies, some monetary benefits kick in that allow their spouse and family to go on living without facing extreme financial hardships. Though the surviving spouse is eligible to receive these much-needed military death benefits, those benefits would stop should the surviving spouse remarry before age 55. 

Military Times shares the story of Nancy Menagh, president of Gold Star Wives of America. Her husband, Capt. Philip Menagh was killed during a military training exercise in 1984. The death not only left his wife and five young children grieving but also made them eligible for financial benefits so they could continue to live comfortably. Though Menagh never remarried, she has become one of the primary advocates for amending the rules so that the surviving spouse can marry again without losing payouts. It is her belief that current Federal rules harm the surviving spouse’s ability to rediscover love and move forward. 

This month, some lawmakers reintroduced legislation to eliminate rules that would strip the surviving spouse of access to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) checks, home loans, educational benefits, and more if they remarry before age 55. Under the current law, if a spouse remarries after that age, they may retain benefit eligibility. Rep. Mike Walz, R-Fla., a former Army Green Beret, explains, “These rules were put in place at a different time, and are now just arbitrary and don’t make any sense.”

Previously, lawmakers lowered the military remarriage penalty age from 57 to 55; however, many surviving spouses such as Menagh believe that is not enough. Military Times asserts that the measure could affect as many as 31,000 spouses currently receiving DIC benefits and under the age of 55. However, the idea of ending the penalty has gained low political momentum to date, mainly attributed to its high price tag. The new bill is estimated to cost about $180 million over the next decade. Still, Menagh has vowed to continue lobbying for change. 



We hope you've enjoyed this article. While you're here, we have a small favor to ask...

Support the AMAC Foundation. Our 501(c)(3) powers the AMAC Foundation’s Social Security Advisory Services. This team of nationally accredited advisors offers on-time, on-the-mark guidance for those approaching or receiving Social Security – at no cost.

Donate Now

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1 year ago

I think the spouse of any service member who dies on active duty should retain all the same benefits as though the service member retired after 20 years or at his current time and rank or at the rank of Major, which ever is higher and enlisted at current rank or an E-7 which ever is higher both at 55% (survivors benefit) of that retirement pay. I believe those who died in combat the spouse should receive 100%.The kids and spouse should have equal shares of the GI Bill without time limitations and the spouse should retain the GI Bill mortgage benefits. The children and the spouse would maintain their medical benefits – tri-care for life. Children medical benefits end at 18 – 21 depending on circumstances. Marital status at any age shouldn’t be a factor. Grieve counseling should be offered to assist the spouse when to grieve no more and move on with their life.

1 year ago

The basis of this law is the expectation that the new spouse should become financially responsible for the children of the father killed in action. It also plays to the denial that the military wife’s traveling requirements have greatly diminished her career and earning capacity. The government wants her to also become someone else’s financial burden as well. The more I know about our government, the more disgusting these Washington thugs become. Compared to how much they waste, $18 million a year (average) is nothing.

1 year ago

180million over 10 years is chump change. Look at the pet projects that get Billions!

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x