Democrat Obstruction in the Senate Is Hurting Our Courts

Senate confirms hearings courtsOur federal courts are facing a vacancy crisis like never before.

The number of judicial vacancies across the federal bench has averaged 142 so far this year. The only year that came close to this was 1991, which had an average of 138 vacancies—but that was shortly after Congress created 85 new judicial positions.

More than half of the current vacancies are designated as “judicial emergencies” by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts because those seats have been open so long and they significantly impact the caseloads of other judges. This is a real vacancy crisis.

As of May 30, 39 nominees to the U.S. district courts and U.S. courts of appeal were pending before the full Senate after being approved by the Judiciary Committee. More than half of these nominees are slated to fill judicial emergency vacancies.

With so many vacancies, you might ask, why doesn’t the Senate just approve these pending nominees?

The confirmation process has two speeds: normal and slog. Not “slow,” but “slog.” This is the speed that results when the minority party uses various tactics to intentionally make the process as cumbersome and time-consuming as possible. It’s like trying to walk through molasses.

The confirmation process has been a slog almost since President Donald Trump took office. One of the tactics that Democrats are using is to force the Senate to take two separate votes on every nomination: one to end debate, and one to confirm.

Democrats have forced double votes on 95 percent of Trump’s judicial nominees so far. That’s compared to 8 percent of President Barack Obama’s nominees at this point, and a flat zero for Presidents George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, and Jimmy Carter. You could keep going back and the result would be the same.

This one tactic is a drag on the confirmation process in four ways.

First, since the number of votes needed to end debate and to confirm are the same, there is no reason to take any votes to end debate. Second, the Senate has to wait two days to vote on ending debate after a vote is requested. Third, even after the Senate votes to end debate, there can be up to 30 more hours of consideration. And fourth, Democrats are forcing the Senate to jump through these hoops for nominees who have no opposition at all, and for more than a half-dozen originally nominated by Obama.

Even after debate is ended, Democrats are forcing the Senate to take a formal roll call vote to approve every single nomination. For context, in more than 200 years, at normal confirmation speed, the Senate used a roll call vote to confirm only 4 percent of judicial nominations. In yet another double-standard, Democrats have forced a roll call vote to confirm 96 percent of Trump’s judicial nominations.

Why is this such a big deal? A roll call vote requires every senator to come to the Senate floor and takes an average of about 35 minutes. The normal way of approving nominations was by unanimous consent or a voice vote, which did not require the presence of every senator and could take about 35 seconds. It all adds up.

The bottom line is that nominations that used to be confirmed in a matter of hours now can take a week or more. When the confirmation process is at slog speed, it displaces much more of the Senate’s business and presents much more challenging choices for the majority leader.

Democrats have slowed the confirmation process to a slog because they can, but it’s taking a serious toll on the judiciary. Vacancies are now more than 30 percent higher than when Trump took office, and at the level they are today, the American people who must bring matters to the courts are getting shortchanged.

From - The Daily Signal - by Thomas Jipping

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Allen Way
4 years ago

It is time to open season on shumer.

Cindy Sue
4 years ago

who does Samantha Bee think she is? Does anyone even watch that low life program she is part of? Only people that live in the gutter speak the way she does and that is beneath scum. What a tramp.

4 years ago
Reply to  Cindy Sue

Samantha Bee is merely the latest representation of the liberal media hysteria that controls what is broadcast and heard by most of America today. You have to realize that her show is taped several hours ahead of time, so it can be reviewed by the show’s Producers, network censors, if any exist, and network management for both content and for purposes of selling air time to various sponsors. So this was not a live, unscripted event that managed to “slip by” the folks in the control room. Literally dozens of people saw what was going to be broadcast several hours before the show was to be broadcast and NONE OF THEM considered anything she said as either patently offensive or the rantings of an unhinged individual. Both of which would apply to Samantha Bee. That says a great deal about what the MSM is made up of today. So not only is she personally at fault, and should lose her job if we were to apply the same “circle the wagons to protect a member of the former Obama administration” just demonstrated by Disney by firing Roseanne, by we have yet another example of the double standard within the MSM. If you are a Democrat and / or raving Socialist, you can pretty much say anything you want against any Republican or conservative. If on the other hand you dare to say anything, no matter how mild, about a beloved Democrat or member of a “protected group”, like President Trump calling members of MS-13 animals, the media will do everything in its power to inflict as much damage as possible. This iS not new by the way. You can go back decades and see how the media has always protected like-minded liberals and leftists, while savaging Republicans and conservatives.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x