AMAC Blog

Blog , Lifestyle and Entertainment

Polarization Is Affecting the Classroom. Educators Have Some Options

Posted on Tuesday, August 8, 2023
|
by Outside Contributor
|
6 Comments
|
Print
Classroom educators

Over the past few years, schools have been the site of fierce political conflict. While the U.S. has a long history of conflict in and about schools, things seem exceptionally intense and not in a good way. It feels like everybody is butting heads with everybody else. Parents, teachers, school leaders, teacher unions, community members, students, state legislators—this entire post could easily be just a list of conflicts among different stakeholders in schools. Everyone is certain they are on the side of the angels … and that the other side is most definitely not. And the volume is turned up to 11.

Compounding typical disagreement about schools is the rise of polarization across the social and political spheres of our country. Echo chambers reinforce singular perspectives, quash dissent, and make it nearly impossible to hear reason from an opposing viewpoint. Even worse, our attention-based media ecosystem prioritizes the loudest voices and the hottest takes. So, when you do hear the opposing side, you tend to get the version that gets the most clicks.

It all adds up to a sobering reality for schools. Polarization is distracting our schools from their most fundamental purpose: educating children.

A new series of interviews prepared by my organization, the Constructive Dialogue Institute (CDI), provides some insights into how educators see polarization affecting the work of schools. We conducted interviews with 14 public school teachers from diverse regions and grade levels, and they offer snapshots of classrooms, school board meetings, teacher interactions, and communications with parents.

One teacher, for example, noticed how the calculus behind a routine decision to choose a textbook has changed as America has become more politically divided. The first questions the district considered weren’t about student learning but rather about the politics of the decision. “How can this be viewed through the lens of polarization? How’s the community going to receive this? Who could potentially look at this textbook? What state did it come from?”

It’s not just textbook choices, either. We found that educators are increasingly experiencing a chilling effect on classroom dialogue. On the one hand, they feel a sense of increased scrutiny over their work that leads them to pull back from leading classroom discussions out of fear of reprisal. This can come from multiple sources—state legislators, community members, or parents—and from both the right and the left. On the other hand, when educators do engage in discussions, their attempts feel more and more likely to devolve into name-calling among students. “It just became safer to just avoid current events altogether, even if it was something major,” one educator reported.

Pulling back from discussion stings for educators. Another educator we spoke to expressed feelings of guilt for avoiding classroom dialogue. “I hate to admit this, but I’ve been starting to walk away from discussion in my classroom. I’ve been doing more and more ‘Watch the video, read the book, answer the questions, wait for the bell, leave my classroom.’” For the teachers, avoidance lowers the pressure. But if the alternative is disengagement, the cost is steep.

We need to ask ourselves: Is this the direction we want to go?

The bad news is that polarization is not going away anytime soon. It’s a complex problem that needs to be addressed at many levels. Educators will increasingly feel the pressure as we further sort, align, and consequently distance ourselves by ideology. Still, all is not lost. There are ways educators can address how polarization reaches into their schools and classrooms.

The trick is to tackle the part of the problem educators can control. Things like social media, political campaigns, and news media drive polarization at a scale no single educator can truly address. But in their classrooms, schools, and communities, educators can begin to repair fractured trust and develop understanding across differences. They don’t have to avoid discussion and miss out on opportunities to develop students’ critical-thinking skills. They can help their students develop the mindsets and skills they need to navigate differences of opinion and belief. One real way forward is for educators to teach students how to engage in constructive dialogue.

Later this week, in another letter, I’ll explain why constructive dialogue is a viable solution. I’m not going to claim that building practices of constructive dialogue in classrooms and schools will make all disagreements and conflicts related to polarization disappear, as there are real differences of opinion about schools that we aren’t going to resolve overnight. But we shouldn’t be afraid of those disagreements or avoid them. We can intentionally build capacity for discussion and disagreement and we can change how we navigate ideological tensions. Doing so will help us all get back to making the best educational decisions for all our children.

 

Reprinted with Permission from American Enterprise Institute – By Frederick M. Hess

Share this article:
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Philip Seth Hammersley
Philip Seth Hammersley
1 year ago

Any teacher who loves his students should quit the NEA and AFT IMMEDIATELY! These unions are pushing detrimental propaganda and supporting child porn and child mutilation!!

anna hubert
anna hubert
1 year ago

Right now the only one profiting from ed system is a teacher whose pocket is full while student head is empty except for indoctrinating garbage

Rik
Rik
1 year ago

All they want to teach is Communist Indoctrination and the stupid people are allowing them to. I fear that America is heading for more than verbal conflict! After all, doesn’t History Repeat Itself? Civil War Part Ii anyone?

Stephen Russell
Stephen Russell
1 year ago

Cant teach when one has Division & divide

Robert Zuccaro
Robert Zuccaro
1 year ago

They mostly treated us like dirt standing watch on gate security on a naval base, the teachers were the rudest and hardest to deal with when they had expired base passes/decals. Don’t imagine they were any nicer in the classroom!

Wiliam M Schane
Wiliam M Schane
1 year ago

It is increasingly popular to talk about constructive discussion in education. The problem is the ideology of the teachers’ unions is Marxist and it does not allow for discussion of opposing ideas. The choice of text books is critical because of the vast number of Marxist oriented books offered. How does one engage in a constructive dialogue with someone whe desires the destruction of the society and nation?

Join Now!

Money-Saving Benefits News, Podcasts, & Magazine A Strong Voice on Capitol Hill

All Membership Packages Include Your Spouse for FREE!

1 YEAR MEMBERSHIP

3 YEAR MEMBERSHIP

5 YEAR MEMBERSHIP

LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP

The Joy of Cooking with Grandchildren
Planning a Budget-Friendly Family Vacation
Tips to Donating Clothes
10 Classic Board Games All Baby Boomers Remember

Stay informed! Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter.

"*" indicates required fields

6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Subscribe to AMAC Daily News and Games