Politics

Bernie Sanders’ ‘Jobs’ Program Would Undo Our Real Economic Progress

Bernie Sanders health care jobsSen. Bernie Sanders’ big-idea solution to everything is big government.

The independent senator from Vermont wants government-run, single-payer health care. Seeing efficiencies that nobody else can see, he wants to turn post offices into banks.

Now, he wants to leverage the notoriously inept federal job-training system (see hereherehereetc.) and a new set of regional bureaucracies to guarantee everybody a job.

In addition to not actually working, the program would require gobs of money. Of course, that is no problem for Sanders so long as at least one solvent corporation or rich person remains in America. We will tax them to pay for whatever is the big-spending plan of the day.

In this worldview, the economy is a big pile of money that simply needs to be distributed fairly. Incentives matter little. Tax cuts are thievery and not a means of stimulating job-creating investment.

However, reality is different. Incentives do matter, just as we have seen in the past year. The tax cuts passed in December have already led to pay raises, bonuses, and (more importantly) increased investment. It is this increased investment that will lead to continuing raises and bonuses.

The rhetoric of big-government jobs programs originated in the Great Depression, a time when the unemployment rate was 25 percent. But today’s unemployment rate is barely above 4 percent—a level widely viewed as representing full employment.

Of course, there are still people who want to work and can’t find a job—but the big picture is backward from what most people think. The problem is not so much with job availability as with finding workers who can show up and pass a drug test.

The issue is not just with marijuana. Seventy percent of firms in one survey blamed opioids for problems with absenteeism, reduced productivity, and safety issues. The track record of federal jobs programs gives little hope that yet another expensive jobs bill will solve what is more a mental health problem than a job shortage.

Wages grow when productivity grows. Stimulating investment, as the recent tax cuts are doing, will increase productivity. Bloated, costly, ineffective federal jobs programs will not. Pretending otherwise may stir up the crowds at rallies of the uninformed, but it won’t get them good jobs.

From - The Daily Signal - by David Kreutzer

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC News App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Sign Up Today
Read more articles by Outside Contributor
Subscribe
Notify of
10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ScarletDove
3 years ago

Nothing that comes out of this old communists mouth is worth anything…..Sanders is an embarrassment to my generation….truly a radical slacker who has made money off of his sleazy politics!

MamaBess
3 years ago

Just as a suggestion: Since this will be “government employees”, lets include our senators and representatives in the list. I am sure they would all go for a guaranteed $15 per hour!

SARGE
3 years ago

Hey Paul, your right. AMAC does this all the time. They’ll change a word or two to make the subject appear different. Hey, what the heck is collaborative correspondence? Are a lot of these articles computer generated? Just wondering, it seems if AMAC calls the article collaborative correspondence so they don’t have to pay i don’t know.

John Higgins
3 years ago
Reply to  SARGE

I dunno, What’s wrong with. “All the news that’s fit to Reprint”. Reader’s Digest did it well.
I’d rather see them spend their money getting members than hiring writers. Just my opinion.

PaulE
3 years ago
Reply to  SARGE

Hi Sarge,

It essentially seems to be AMAC’s way of saying they copy articles from various other sources and then just maybe add a one or two quotes from Mr. Weber to make it look like it originated at AMAC. Yet at the very bottom of these articles, they actually list which publication the article was copied from and who the original author was. I guess AMAC wants their membership to think they have a lot of journalists working for them, when in actuality it seems they have one or two that occasionally write a puff piece on one of AMAC’s various policies being lobbied before Congress. Yes, it would make more sense and be more honest to simply credit the original publication source and author at the top of the article instead of labeling everything collaborative correspondent.

As for running multiple versions of the same story, I think AMAC does that because sometime they don’t like the comments people have posted on the subject. So they just put a “new” version of the exact same article up, with just one or two words changed.

SARGE
3 years ago
Reply to  PaulE

Thanks Paul. I finally know what that means.

PaulE
3 years ago

Running out of topics to post? This topic was just covered in another article a few days ago. What’s wrong AMAC, don’t you like the replies that version generated? Bottom line: What Bernie and the other so-called members of the Democrat Party (actually should be re-named the Socialist Party at this point) are selling is pure, classic socialism. It has never worked anywhere it has ever been implemented and it never will. Socialism is based on a set of a fundamentally flawed economic and political principals, that cannot sustain themselves in the real-world and only lead to everyone, but the small leadership class, being reduced to abject poverty and misery.

Ivan Berry
3 years ago
Reply to  PaulE

Enough said, but they just keep on talking.

PaulE
3 years ago
Reply to  Ivan Berry

HI Ivan,

You have to wonder if AMAC really thinks that everyones’ attention spans and memories are so short, that AMAC literally believes most people can’t remember they essentially read the same article a day or two before. That says a lot about what AMAC must think of the average member’s mental capacity. Not very complimentary to say the least. Kind of like how AARP views their membership base. A distinction without a difference.

Ivan Berry
3 years ago
Reply to  PaulE

Maybe plainly stating, and in a nut shell, the Bernie principle would help: Bernie is always willing to put your money where his mouth is.

10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x