Advocacy / Advocating for You / AMAC Action On Capitol Hill / AMAC Action's Response / National Debt / Small Business / Taxes

AMAC Joins Coalition Calling for Fix to Policy Mistakes in the American Rescue Plan

AmericanThis legislation appears to prohibit states from using federal funds to directly or indirectly reduce net state tax revenue through 2024. This means that any tax relief at the state level could be called into question by aggressive federal action and could harm state taxpayers.

March 17, 2021

Dear Members of Congress:

We, the undersigned organizations, representing millions of Americans and thousands of state and local officials, write to express our profound concerns with provisions in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. Elements of this recently adopted legislation fundamentally threaten the principles of federalism and fiscal responsibility.

The American Rescue Plan Act includes $350 billion in State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. This is despite early reports that show total state and local revenue actually increased in calendar year 2020, and many states currently have significant surpluses. These funds also are in addition to the hundreds of billions in federal assistance to state and local units of government through the CARES Act and other measures in 2020. Over the past year, our organizations raised concerns around the many public policy problems created by a federal bailout of state and local government budgets. Additionally, hundreds of state legislators voiced their numerous policy concerns.

Now that this bailout of state and local governments has been signed into law by President Biden, there is perhaps an even more troubling element than any of us could have anticipated. As the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal recently pointed out, states appear to be prohibited from using these new federal funds to directly or indirectly reduce net state tax revenue through 2024. With the fungible nature of budgeting, and absent any clarifications from the Department of Treasury, the incredibly ambiguous language involving indirect net revenue reductions means that any tax relief at the state level could potentially be called into question by aggressive federal action. This will undoubtedly harm state taxpayers and the future economic competitiveness of states.

To address this glaring policy mistake, U.S. Senator Mike Braun’s “Let States Cut Taxes Act” would allow states more flexibility in the way they can use federal funds, if they choose to take the money. We understand Congressman Dan Bishop plans to propose policy reforms as well. Absent reforms like these, states will be pressured into using federal funds to grow government and baseline spending totals. We watched this play out more than a decade ago with the Obama-era “American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009” (ARRA) and those infamous “shovel ready” projects. Growing state government bureaucracy with federal funds would create massive state budget challenges as the money disappears, but the federal requirements live on for years to come.

Using federal coercion to artificially elevate state tax burdens at a time when small businesses and hardworking American taxpayers need real tax relief is nonsensical. Our groups have spent decades working with state policymakers and watching them achieve more economically competitive business climates through pro-growth tax and economic reforms. Having the federal government use “the power of the purse” in an attempt to curtail the use of competitive federalism is incredibly damaging to our American system of government.

We will work to protect the fundamental principle of federalism and allow states to continue their progress in pursuing economic gains as the “laboratories of democracy.” Restricting states from providing pro-growth net tax relief tips the scales of federalism inexorably toward central planning and micromanagement by the federal government.

We applaud Senator Mike Braun and Congressman Dan Bishop for taking on this important fight to shield states and their hardworking taxpayers from burdensome federal overreach. We stand ready to assist you as you work to expose the numerous areas of harmful policy implemented by the American Rescue Plan Act.

Lisa B. Nelson
CEO, American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC)

Grover Norquist
President, Americans for Tax Reform

Steve Moore
Economist and Cofounder, Committee to Unleash Prosperity

Adam Brandon
President, FreedomWorks

David McIntosh
President, Club for Growth

Tom Schatz
President, Council for Citizens Against Government Waste

David Williams
President, Taxpayers Protection Alliance

Carrie Lukas
President, Independent Women’s Forum

Heather Higgins
CEO, Independent Women’s Voice

Kent Lassman
President & CEO, Competitive Enterprise Institute* (in his individual capacity)

Bob Carlstrom
President, Association of Mature American Citizens Action

Alfredo Ortiz
President and CEO, Job Creators Network

Phil Kerpen
President, American Commitment

Garrett Bess
Vice President of Government Relations and Communications, Heritage Action for America

Brandon Arnold
Executive Vice President, National Taxpayers Union

Brent Wm. Gardner
Chief Government Affairs Officer, Americans for Prosperity

Daniel Garza
President, The Libre Initiative

Mario H. Lopez
President, Hispanic Leadership Fund

Brian Garst
Vice President, Center for Freedom & Prosperity

Lori Roman
President, American Constitutional Rights Union Action

Saulius “Saul” Anuzis
President, 60 Plus Association

The Honorable Tim Jones
Frmr. Speaker, Missouri House of Representatives; Chairman of the Missouri Center-Right Coalition

Douglas Carswell
President & CEO, Mississippi Center for Public Policy

Carl Bearden
CEO, United for Missouri

Joseph G. Lehman
President, Mackinac Center for Public Policy

Chris Ingstad
President, Iowans for Tax Relief

Dave Trabert
Chief Executive Officer, Kansas Policy Institute

Jonathan Small
President, Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs

Print Opposition Letter

We hope you've enjoyed this article. While you're here, we have a small favor to ask...

Support AMAC Action. Our 501 (C)(4) advances initiatives on Capitol Hill, in the state legislatures, and at the local level to protect American values, free speech, the exercise of religion, equality of opportunity, sanctity of life, and the rule of law.

Donate Now

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter
and Download the AMAC App

Sign Up Today Download

If You Enjoy Articles Like This - Subscribe to the AMAC Daily Newsletter!

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
2 years ago

When former Pres. Obama came up with his stimulus bill, which included funds going to state and local treasuries, money ended up being spent on stupid and unnecessary projects just to use it up. Schools replaced sidewalks that didn’t need to be replaced (I saw this happen and asked why: “Gotta use the money.”). Government agencies begged those of us who were involved with agency/community partnerships to come up with ways to use the money (“C’mon guys, what do you want to do with it?”).

That’s what happens when so few in government know how hard it is to make a buck in the private sector and, therefore, why we fight to keep taxes low. They just don’t understand how the economy is supposed to work in a free society.

2 years ago
Reply to  Kim

Well Kim, you can expect to see many, many more examples real soon as to how to waste these tax dollars. Much of the $350 billion dollars will be funneled towards blue state public pension plans, that have been both grossly mismanaged and under-funded for decades. That item alone should be good for about $200 billion of the $350 billion. Pension reform in most of the blue states is a joke, with Democrat government officials just routinely giving the public service unions just about whatever they demand. Then there are all the duplicative social welfare programs that will see their budgets boosted to “use up the money”., along with creating a slew of new social welfare programs to burn through the cash. Government is very good at finding creative ways to “Gotta use the money.”.

Today alone, the city of Paterson here in New Jersey will be starting a pilot program for 400 families to field test UBI (Universal Basic Income). The city is one of several Democrat strongholds in the state and I’m sure these 400 families were hand selected by the local Democrat politicians for their loyalty to the party and willingness to say how wonderful the program is. Then the pilot program will be declared a resounding success and used a justification to both state-wide and nation-wide implementation of UBI.

2 years ago
Reply to  PaulE

Rather than a small step, this bill is just the first of probably a few “plans” we’ll see over the next few years that will throw this country toward socialism. It’s a sham and a shame, since a large portion of it will be invested by recipients in stocks and Bitcoin (survey quoted by Ric Edelman) and NOT spent on essentials or at stores to buttress the economy. Of the money going to the states, they can dole it out where they want, including, of course, to public schools AND to private schools. Just what our kids need–more liberal government influence.

2 years ago
Reply to  PaulE

What do they do when ubi runs out of money. Tax everyone ln the city 2 continue paying these lazy bums

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x