Vice President Kamala Harris’ weak response to President Joe Biden’s calling Donald Trump supporters “garbage” matches her hyperbolic, incendiary claims that Trump is a “fascist” who relies on the tactics of Adolf Hitler.
Meanwhile, Harris’ running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, compared Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally to a Nazi gathering.
Even high school debate coaches erect a key boundary: When you label your opponent a Nazi, you’ve lost.
StopAntisemitism, which describes itself as a grassroots watchdog organization, called foul, posting a statement on X that went viral:
As Harris struggles in polls to reach the necessary Electoral College tally of 270 votes, and also in the betting markets, the Democratic presidential nominee reeks of desperation while trying to shake her obvious association with the unpopular Biden-Harris administration.
Yet the vice president also conjures a certain familiarity. Numerous examples illustrate how Harris is poised to become Hillary Clinton 2.0. (Clinton, of course, lost to Trump in 2016 as the Democratic presidential nominee.)
Both women are nearly lifelong politicians who never faced the average U.S. voter (e.g. median political ideology vs. blue state extremism). As U.S. senators, both hailed from states that are safe and cushy for liberals.
Their core voters are disconnected from the rest of America—a key factor in an Electoral College-based, states-empowered republic.
The Cook Political Report’s Partisan Voting Index ranks Harris’ California as +13 Democrat margin compared to the nation as a whole; it ranks Clinton’s New York as +10 Democrat. This helps explain why both women have a tin ear about Middle American values.
Because of her last-minute party coronation after Democrats forced Biden out of the race, Harris didn’t earn one single vote in the 2024 Democratic primary season (nor did she as a candidate in 2020). This means she hasn’t faced the average nationwide Democrat voter, either.
Sure, Harris and Clinton both might have relatively middle-class or humble roots (as Harris desperately trots out in the most awkward fashion to any question she gets on the campaign trail, no matter how unrelated).
However, the two women truly have floated in economic and social “privilege” their whole adult lives.
And the fact that Harris was the child of two parents who worked for elite colleges—her mother for the University of California, Berkeley and her father for Stanford—gifted her a childhood of socioeconomic privilege that reverberated into adulthood.
Like Clinton, Harris is out of touch with average Americans. And while Harris at 60 is younger and perceived by some as more likable, Clinton is more articulate and better informed—so perhaps this cancels out.
Even though Clinton, now 77, comes off as more rigid and cold, Harris’ many verbal gaffes mean the vice president projects incompetence instead of endearment.
Tellingly, behind the scenes, Harris’ staff apparently doesn’t experience her as likable. Blistering levels of staff turnover beset the vice president’s office due to allegedly hostile work environments. Harris is ultimately the source of this breakneck turnover.
Whatever Harris enabled or did to cause this excessive turnover is something she can’t hide from voters or the camera. Like Clinton, Harris projects unlikability and doesn’t evoke the deep, fierce loyalty of Trump voters.
Like Clinton, Harris also projects inauthenticity, a sense that she loves celebrities more than everyday people.
Both women like power but don’t seem to care about the people in front of them. This is the opposite of Bill Clinton—numerous reports paint Hillary’s husband as a magnetic politician who makes each person feel like he or she is the only person in the room.
Both women, to compensate for their liberal elite bubbles, selected a balding, white-haired, supposedly inoffensive white man as their VP choice.
In both cases, it screams of pandering. And in both cases, it appears headed for failure.
Carrie Sheffield is a senior policy analyst at Independent Women’s Voice.
Reprinted with Permission from The Daily Signal – By Carrie Sheffield
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of AMAC or AMAC Action.
Either way, both ladies make me sick to my stomach. Where’s the Pepto-Bismol??
Hillary Clinton has a downright “bratty” quality, especially considering that her adult life is void of personal accomplishment. She is a selfish, dishonest “nobody”, who’s main claims to notoriety are her husband’s public infidelity, and her conspicuously unsuccessful presidential candidacy against Donald Trump in 2016.
Lest we forget, Hillary never lived in New York before she ran for office. I think she moved there because polling showed that a sufficient number ignorant democrats resided there that would probably vote for her.
WOW——–That is picture of the two most shameless, corrupt women on earth!
Tough to decide who is more vile? Hillary has probably killed more people.
these gals are leaders of the democrat “mean girls” club. weird marriages. rich and powerful and disliked!
Either one could not make it without lies, fabrications and pandering to whichever group they’d happen to speak to. Cold blooded , hard hearted, the grimace that is supposed to be a smile is as phony as they are. Dangerous and treacherous
If either one would ever become president all of us will be doomed to hell. Just 2 of the many vile human beings in this planet.
I just don’t understand these two folks. Why would you want to destroy American the Beautiful for all the generations to follow you. We the taxpayers should buy both of you 1 way ticket to Russia. It is time for you to go home, out of site and learn to bake cookies with the kids.
mean girls.
They are two of the same kind,AND THAT IS NOT MEANT TO BE A COMPLIMENT,because it is NOT.Just two of many democrat and a few Republican”grifters”.
Ugly Hillary, and skanky Kamala two liberal losers.
If not politics, they share the same chalkboard-scrapping laugh: i both women were to kackle at once, the fabric of space and time would tear and life on a universal scale would end. Just a shared chuckle would be an extinction event on earth!
I wonder if Kamala will pull a Hillary if she loses..go behind the scenes, have a tantrum and disappear, without conceding?
They must have been out together for Halloween!!
Both women climbed the political ladder on the coattails of a man. Hillary rode Bill’s coattails to become a senator and secretary of state. Kamala was married Willie Brown’s girlfriend. He appointed her to many well paying boards and commissions. He also helped her become SF DA and then California AG. Neither would have gotten anywhere by themselves. Both have spent more time with celebrities than everyday Americans. Neither know how to connect with other people….
And H Clinton’s thesis at college was Saul Alyinkys”Rules For Radicals”.Hillary was fired by one Lefty for being A Stalinist.
Two despicable individuals, out of touch is being overly kind because both are pure evil elitists who have nothing but disdain for America and her citizens.
“Thing 1 and Thing 2: The Alinsky Syndrome”
Having refused “democrat” leadership means that we’ve understood the issues, and displayed common sense by not stepping in filth… or being governed by it.
Sorry, you can’t “vanish” the evidence of Trump’s economic skills, especially after he saved our economy from Obama’s buffoonish restraints on commerce. What a useless, egotistical, phony, racist, and destructive narcissist Obama was as President. His “Performance” in office was abominable.
As soon as all liberals find a brain.
Right after you people concede the 2000, 2004, and 2016 one? Send that msg out with Stacy Abrams.
et is gay