AMAC - The Conservative Alternative to AARP

Need more info? Call Us: 1-888-262-2006
Join Today
  • National Auto & Home Insurance Discounts
  • Health & Life Insurance
  • Medicare Supplement
  • Long-Term Care Insurance
  • National Travel Discounts

The Teachers’ Unions Are On The Ropes

bad teacherThey were marching in Madison. And they’ll be on a street in a state capitol near you in the coming weeks and months. The teachers’ unions are on the ropes, and they know it. They know that public opinion has shifted, and the public mood has shifted with it. And they know why.

The people now know all about the racket the teachers’ unions and other public employee unions have been running for the past twenty years. The public now knows that it is a bad idea to have union representatives and the politicians they elect sitting at a table negotiating pensions and health care benefits. Because there is no one at that table representing them. There is no one representing the taxpayer.

All of this started in New Jersey, of all places. Millions of residents started watching Governor Chris Christie challenge the teachers’ union on You Tube last year. Christie was armed with facts, figures and arguments the mainstream media never saw fit to report, and the union bosses he challenged had no real answers.

It was real news to the residents of New Jersey, how the teachers’ unions had rigged the system. Because for decades, the story went untold by the Newark Star Ledger and Bergen Record, the state’s two largest dailies. The editors either didn’t think the corrupt collective bargaining process was an issue worthy of a series, or didn’t have a problem with the process. I suspect that many of the editors liked being for what their ideological opponents were against. Because both of those papers are liberal by any objective standard, and those that challenged the teachers’ unions tended to be Republicans.

In the past, politicians who dared to challenge union power were portrayed by the unions and their supporters as the bad guys. As being against the children. As being against education. And the future.

Those days are over.

It ain’t easy being a Middle East dictator these days. Or a union boss. Or a newspaper editor or TV news producer.

But there is much more at stake than collective bargaining in this fight. The teachers unions themselves are on the ropes, as more Americans start to ask hard questions about how we spend our money educating our children. As we start to ask hard questions about tenure, about the hiring and firing of teachers, about merit pay, about charter schools, and about online learning.

The teachers’ unions are scurrying to protect their power, and are engaging in defensive maneuvers to protect their power. Because that has been the reality of public education for the last 30 years – the unions have been calling the shots on public education, while “We the People” paid the bills.

A New York Times headline on Thursday is Exhibit A of just how scared the unions are: “Leader of Teachers’ Union Urges Dismissal Overhaul.” Here is how that story began:

Responding to criticism that tenure gives even poor teachers a job for life, Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, announced a plan Thursday to overhaul how teachers are evaluated and dismissed. It would give tenured teachers who are rated unsatisfactory by their principals a maximum of one school year to improve. If they did not, they could be fired within 100 days.

You heard it right. The union boss admitted that tenure is a bad idea. That giving a person a lifetime job after only 3 years of work is a really, really bad idea. But this admission is 30 years too late. The unions want to continue to control the education system, but they will lose this battle. Because it doesn’t make any sense to have the teachers’ unions in control of hiring and firing teachers. Any more than it makes sense to have inmates running parole hearings.

In an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal last year, Joel Klein, New York City’s Superintendent of Schools for the past 8 years, wrote an editorial that eviscerated the unions. After chronicling some of the innovations he spearheaded, he wrote this about entrenched union power.

“Changing the system wasn’t easy. The people with the loudest and best-funded voices are committed to maintaining a status quo that protects their needs even if it doesn’t work for children. They want to keep their jobs by preserving a guaranteed customer base (a fixed number of students), regardless of performance. We have to rid the system of this self-serving approach.”

The teachers’ unions are on the ropes. Thanks to a nearly three decade rule over how we run our schools, and how we choose and reward our nation’s teachers, their power is being successfully challenged by politicians who have the truth on their side. And the interests of the tax payers. And the children

Sadly for the union bosses, there is not much they can do about it.

Comments (60)

  1. JRB says:

    I am a retired teacher in Texas, a right to work state, where teacher’s salaries are not negotiated by unions. After 26 years of service, my final salary for a 187 day contract was $56,000. I consider that a very nice salary for a second income. In my area, it would be difficult for a family of 4 or more to live on that amount without a second paycheck. Many districts in rural areas pay much less. Salaries pretty much reflect the cost of living in the area where one works. And in Texas, teachers’ jobs are just as affected by the economy as any other job. When the economy sinks, we get the pink slips too.

    Anyone who has never taught should probably not be making comments about the schedule of a teacher. Most teachers work seven days a week to keep up with the administrative duties, instructional technology, web page maintainance, data collection/analysis and everything else required of them to say nothing of their real job of lesson planning, preparation, grading and serving the students. If you add up the hours, I believe teachers’ work just as many (or more) than any other profession. Just because some of it is done at home doesn’t mean it is less pressure.

    I believe Texas is better off being a non-union state. That’s why we have so many excellent, dedicated, self-sacrificing teachers. They have to stay current, be totally up-to-speed, and produce good results or the process for their growth or removal begins.

  2. W Guertin says:

    I am a conservative from Massachusetts and a Christian. The rants I hear from the misguided bloggers on your site regarding unions is stunning. Let’s not forget corporate greed and in many cases the revolving door of personnel turnovers and why unions offer security and representation. I belong to the Professional Firefighters of Massachusetts and the International Association of Firefighters. The safety rules and regulations are what we fought for and bargained for. State Laws or Corporations just didn’t decide it would be nice to give them to us. I was interested in your services as opposed to AARP until I read about your lumping of all unionism into the same pot. And, by the way we contribute to our plan and don’t get full social security, no matter how many years we worked in the private sector. The anti-union ranters are quite ridiculous in their conclusions. If you don’t want to join a union, don’t. Go make it big incorporate America.

  3. Vern says:

    SOME THOUGHTS ON TEACHER SALARY NEGOTIATIONS

    With teacher salary negotiations annually adding to the financial hardships facing the Elmhurst
    schools, here are some thoughts for the Board of Education:
    (1) Concern for Dollars Raised for the Education Fund: There is a great concern that when the Education Fund of a school district is increased, the teachers’ union will immediately compute the amount of increased revenue generated and then ask for twice this amount in the negotiation process.
    Although union negotiators will continually insist that their concerns are for classroom needs, when it comes to a final settlement, it is always the amount of salary increase that settles negotiations.
    (2) The Myth of the Underpaid Teacher: The average citizen has no idea how much teachers make because the teachers’ union has done an excellent job of perpetuating the myth that teachers are underpaid. While this may be true in many other states and even in smaller cities and rural areas in Illinois, it is certainly not true in Suburban Cook or DuPage counties. A complete listing of salaries, along with the stipends for extra duties–which can be substantial–should be made available to the public.
    (3) What Do Teachers Get That Most Other Working People Do Not (and do teachers have any clue that they have these unusual benefits?):
    (A) Guaranteed Lifetime Employment: Can anyone even put a dollar value on this incredi- ble benefit? Let’s ask the people who have lost their jobs through downsizing, technology changes, or transfer of their jobs to foreign countries how much “lifetime” employment would be worth to them, especially as they reach ages 50 and above.
    Do teachers realize the value of guaranteed “lifetime” employment?
    (B) A Pension System that is Probably in the Top 5% of All Occupations: With many teachers reaching retirement in the $80,000 – $100,000 (or more) range, and with the retirement system providing 80% of the last several year average for long-term teachers, many teachers are now retiring at $64,000 – $80,000/year or more. In order to generate this type of income yearly, at an annual interest rate of 5%, an individuals would have to have accumulated a sum ranging from $1,300,000 – $1,600,000! (And the state increases the amount by 3% each year of retirement.)
    Do teachers realize the tremendous pension system they have and how much they would have had to save during their lifetime to get a pension like this? Do they consider this fac- tor when comparing themselves to other occupations?
    (C) An Outstanding, Primarily District-Funded Medical Program: With many of the U.S. population without health insurance and with many companies reducing benefits or demanding a greater share of the costs from employees, teachers have an outstanding health insurance benefit that is paid largely by the school district. Any attempt to get teachers to contribute a portion to offset this cost is met with a “no-way” attitude.
    Do teachers understand that their health benefit is better than most employed people have? Do they have any idea of the cost to the District? Do they realize that this tremendous benefit also carries to a great extent into their retirement?

    Some Thoughts on Teacher Salary Negotiations Page 2

    (D) A Salary Schedule That Has Yearly Step Increases for All Teachers Except Those at the Top of Their Ranges: Do teachers know that most companies do not provide automatic increases each year. It is incredible that teacher union negotiators do not view the “step increase” as a salary increase. Are there any other occupations where a per son gets more money this year than last year but claims it is not a raise? Teachers tradi tionally say, “We’re entitled to our step by simply being here–now how much is our raise going to be?”
    Do teachers realize that most people who receive more salary this year than last year would consider that they had been given a raise?
    (E) A Work Year that is Filled with Holidays and Extensive Time Off: With the teaching year approximately 175 days, and some of those days made up of “institute” or other non- teaching days, teachers have a work year that is the envy of all other working people who generally have a 260 day work year, with perhaps 6 holidays and 10 – 20 vacation days for a total of about 234 – 244 days or approximately 70 more working days or 14 5-day weeks more than teachers. Yes, many teachers have papers to grade and classes to prepare for but most other positions having the same salary ranges do not have 9 – 5 jobs, and many of these positions require extensive travel, “homework” and time away from home.
    Do teachers appreciate the extraordinary work year they have?
    (4) How Much Time is Really Required to “keep up to date” in their teaching fields? Is the amount of time to stay current in one’s teaching field any more than the type required to stay current in any other professional field? In fact, in a large number of subject areas, is any great expenditure of time needed? Yes, teaching is a stressful occupation, but so are most other occupations–especially if one is faced with loss of health insurance, pension rights or the job itself.
    (5) Will the District Lose Good Teachers if it is Not Among the Highest Paying in the Area? This “scare tactic” is typically part of a union strategy as it continually pits one district against another. However, the desirability of the area–and the salary schedules as they stand–are so far above many others in the country, that applicants for all but the most difficult to fill subject areas (of which there are very few), will make teaching openings in this area very attractive to outstanding teachers from other areas. Local, experienced individuals high on the salary schedule will find resistance to hire from other districts who generally do not want to add teachers high on the salary schedules.
    (5) A Negotiating Strategy that Always Works for Teacher Union Negotiators: At the beginning of negotiations, the union always presses the agreement that there will be no statements by either party until negotiations are concluded–and then the union constantly leaks information that is to their benefit while the school board honors its commitment for silence.
    To eliminate the above, which works only to the benefit of the union, I would urge the board not to agree to limiting statements but to let both sides be free to keep the public informed at all stages of the negotiations. Specifically, what is the union demanding and what is the school board’s response. “Negotiations” is technically a misnomer because to the union it means–of all the thing we are asking for, which ones will you give us? There is never any “give-backs” or “trades;” ie. We will give you “A” if you agree to pay an increased portion of the district’s increasing costs of health insurance.
    Conclusion: It is time for teachers to stop feeling sorry for themselves and recognize that they are among the privileged few in our society.

    • Deborah Moorin says:

      I am a mature american who, due to divorce and small children to raise, went back to school and earned an elementary teaching degree in Virginia where joining unions is not encouraged.

      Now I’ve been working 10 to 14 hours a day and more, often 6 days a week, for 8 years in Bedford County Virginia. I must say the many days off that you speak about are not what they appear for me as I end up working more than half of every “vacation” cleaning up, staying organized, planning and preparing to teach with integrity and excellence.

      Now, after all of this hard work I make only 35,000 a year which I am sure you know is well below what americans need to support a family of three in America no matter where you live and does not reflect what this kind of hard work for 8 years should garner.

      As a conservative american, I would prefer that teachers earn raises each year rather than expect automatic increases, which by the way, due the economy teachers in my county did not receive for the last 4 years. However, that means educators have to trust our governments to pay us not only enough to live but also fair salaries that reflect our level of dedication and service to our students, their families and the communities in which we work. Many of us have to work and live in places where this is not the case so maybe a more objective approach would better serve your cause.

      Clearly, there are no simple, one size fits all answers and as usual outrage on either side of the issue is unproductive at best.

  4. Vern says:

    I’ve voted for every educational tax increase for the past 40 years in my community–always at a sacrifice to my standard of living. Recently, the local teachers’ union was asked to forego the 3rd year small increase to help solve the high school’s budget problem. The response: “We can’t make this sacrifice.” Guess who won’t be voting for any more education tax increases.

  5. Indyvet says:

    As a Shop Steward and Area Strike Director years ago, I saw the inside operation of Unions. They served our middle class well for many years. Then the tried to destroy this country. They sent our jobs across the border. The corrupted the Education system. There are three generations of teachers in my family and each one has integrity and excellence in their careers…inspite of the union…not because of them!

  6. EQ4ALL says:

    I was seriously considering joining ya’ll until I read this Union bashing article.
    Since you are just another right wing group. I’ll just pass….
    You Union bashers need to remember where your 40 hour work week, healthcare benefits, retirement plans and Worker Safety programs come from. Every system has its flaws but the Unions are not your enemy. The Politicians have tried to make it so.

  7. cruzinbill says:

    I have seen what these unions represent commies, & far left loons.If thats what teachers want to represent them i feel sorry for them.I was a union member for 48 years and i never seen the unions this bad.I would never want any of these commie unions i see today represent me.Teachers of Wisconsin will do better without them.

  8. Appraiser Jim nPA says:

    Thank you Governors for the hard work your doing. It’s about time things are changing before these union guys break the bank.
    I was part of a union for 10 yrs in the private sector. I saw and knew first hand the corruption. I stepped out of the union into the company side after see so many unfair practices all for the dollar, all for the power over someone else.
    This year at Christmas someone mentioned the Govenors name at the table. My sister in-law and brother in-law, both teachers in NJ almost had their veins pump out of their necks & foreheads with pure hatred & disdane.
    Keep up the good work Gov. The liberals have to stop running the show here.
    Thank You

  9. JB, Sr says:

    If you own it, nobody has anything to say about it – -
    If it’s provided for you by others – you have nothing to say about it ! ! ! !

1 2 3

What's Your Opinion

We welcome your comments. Join the discussion and let your voice be heard. All fields are required.